Changing Minds or Changing Channels?: Partisan News in an Age of ChoiceWe live in an age of media saturation, where with a few clicks of the remote—or mouse—we can tune in to programming where the facts fit our ideological predispositions. But what are the political consequences of this vast landscape of media choice? Partisan news has been roundly castigated for reinforcing prior beliefs and contributing to the highly polarized political environment we have today, but there is little evidence to support this claim, and much of what we know about the impact of news media come from studies that were conducted at a time when viewers chose from among six channels rather than scores. Through a series of innovative experiments, Kevin Arceneaux and Martin Johnson show that such criticism is unfounded. Americans who watch cable news are already polarized, and their exposure to partisan programming of their choice has little influence on their political positions. In fact, the opposite is true: viewers become more polarized when forced to watch programming that opposes their beliefs. A much more troubling consequence of the ever-expanding media environment, the authors show, is that it has allowed people to tune out the news: the four top-rated partisan news programs draw a mere three percent of the total number of people watching television. Overturning much of the conventional wisdom, Changing Minds or Changing Channels? demonstrate that the strong effects of media exposure found in past research are simply not applicable in today’s more saturated media landscape. |
Contents
1 | |
Changes in Media Technology and Content | 16 |
Selective Exposure and Media Effects | 40 |
Partisan News and Mass Polarization | 70 |
Hearing the Other Side and Standing Firm | 91 |
The Salience and Framing of Issues | 106 |
Bias and Incivility in Partisan Media | 125 |
Media Effects in the Age of Choice | 147 |
Appendices | 169 |
Notes | 201 |
211 | |
229 | |
Common terms and phrases
agenda setting American assigned attenuation Barack Obama broadcast cable television channels chapter choice condition clip coefficients are given control group counterattitudinal shows definitions discussed Dog Whisperer effects of partisan entertainment seekers errors are given evaluations exposed exposure to counterattitudinal exposure to proattitudinal fall figure find findings first forced exposure Fox News Channel given in cells Hannity Hardball health care reform hostile media perceptions hosts ideological important problem individuals influence issues Iyengar Keith Olbermann mainstream mass media media effects media environment media influence ment moderates motivated MSNBC Mutz need for cognition networks O’Reilly Factor Obama one-tailed opinion opposing arguments partisan media partisan news media partisan news shows party people’s polarization President Obama’s proattitudinal proattitudinal show resistance to opposing salience scholars Sean Hannity seekers and entertainment segments specific standard errors stimuli strongly studies talk shows tion Travel Channel treatment group two-tailed watch partisan