International Atlas of Evaluation

Front Cover
 

Contents

A Diffusion Perspective on Global Developments in Evaluation
3
Evaluation in Danish Governance
29
Evaluation in Finland
49
Evaluation in France
65
Policy Evaluation in Germany Institutional Continuation and Sectoral Activation
79
Evaluation in The Netherlands 19902000 Consolidation and Expansion
95
Coordinated PluralismThe Swedish Case
117
Policy and Program Evaluation in the United Kingdom A Reflective State?
131
A TwoTiered Approach Evaluation Practice in the Republic of Ireland
263
Evaluation in Italy An Inverted Sequence from Performance Management to Program Evaluation?
275
Program Evaluation in Spain Taking Off at the Edge of the TwentyFirst Century?
293
Project and Program Monitoring and Evaluation in Zimbabwe
309
Fragmented Yet Widespread The Practice of Evaluation in Israel
325
The Art of Policy Evaluation in Japan
339
Evaluation in Switzerland Moving toward a Decentralized System
375
Evaluation of Developmental Assistance Its Start Progress and Current Challenges
393

The Australian Government Success with a Central Directive Approach
159
Evaluation in the TwentyFirst Century Two Perspectives on the Canadian Experience
177
Public Policy Evaluation in Korea In Search for New Direction
193
Norway Toward a ResultsOriented Government Administration?
211
The Rise and Fall and Rise Again? of the Evaluation Function in the US Government
227
Evaluation Capacity Building in the Peoples Republic of China Trends and Prospects
251
Evaluation in the European Union Addressing Complexity and Ambiguity
407
Evaluation in the World Bank Antecedents Methods and Instruments
425
Policy Evaluation in International Comparison
439
About the Authors
457
Index
465
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page 5 - study of auditing is actually unable to be precise about what it is talking about. However, and this is the point, it is precisely this fuzziness in the idea of auditing that enables its migration and importation into a wide variety of organizational contexts. The ambiguity of auditing is not a 'methodological' problem but a 'substantive' fact

Bibliographic information