The Transfiguring Sword: The Just War of the Women's Social and Political UnionProvides a new understanding of the recurrent rhetorical need to employ conservative rhetoric in support of a radical cause The Women’s Social and Political Union, the militant branch of the English women’s suffrage movement, turned to arson, bombing, and widespread property destruction as a strategy to achieve suffrage for women. Because of its comparative rarity, terrorist violence by reform (as opposed to revolutionary) movements is underexplored, as is the discursive rhetoric that accompanies this violence. Largely because of the moral stance that drives such movements, the need to justify violence is greater for the reformist than for the revolutionary terrorist. The burden of rhetorical justification falls even more heavily on women utilizing violence, an option generally perceived as open only to men.The militant suffragettes justified their turn to limited terrorism by arguing that their violence was part of a “just war.” Appropriating the rhetoric of a just war in defense of reformist violence allowed the suffragettes to exercise a traditional rhetorical vision for the sake of radical action. The concept of a just war allowed a spinning out of a fantasy of heroes, of a gallant band fighting against the odds. It challenged the imagination of the public to extend to women a heroic vision usually reserved for men and to accept the new expectations inherent in that vision. By incorporating the concept of a just war into their rhetoric, the WSPU leaders took the most conventional justification that Western tradition provides for the use of violence and adapted it to meet their unique circumstance as women using violence for political reform. This study challenges the common view that the suffragettes’ use of military metaphors, their vilification of the government, and their violent attacks on property were signs of hysteria and self-destruction. Instead, what emerges is a picture of a deliberate, if controversial, strategy of violence supported by a rhetorical defense of unusual power and consistency. |
Contents
A Rhetorical Path to Terrorism | 14 |
The Strategy of Forcing the Crisis | 29 |
The Defensive Response to a Culpable Opponent | 56 |
Copyright | |
3 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
According action acts actual appeared argued argument army attacks audience became believe Bill break bring British called cause Christabel Pankhurst claimed Communication concern considered continued crisis December defensive described early effective Emmeline Pankhurst Emmeline Pethick-Lawrence evil example faced feeding fight Figure final fire force franchise future George give guerrilla hand House human issue justified letter Liberal Lloyd London male March means ment methods militancy ministers moral move movement nature Paul peace physical political presented Press prison problem protest question reform reformist response revolutionary rhetoric Social speak speech Story strategy strike suffering suffrage suffragettes tactics terrorism terrorist thing Tickner tion took tradition turned union members union rhetors violence Votes for Women woman WSPU York