Irreconcilable Differences?: Intellectual Stalemate in the Gay Rights Debate
Greenwood Publishing Group, Jan 1, 2002 - Language Arts & Disciplines - 237 pages
In recent year, pro-gay and anti-gay rights activists have engaged in a struggle to sway public opinion in their favor through the use of ideologically charged rhetoric in an effort to win support from an undecided public. The author contends, however, that the debate is stalemated precisely because each side stereotypes and pathologizes the other's perspective, thereby becoming "perfect enemies" divided on every issue and with such intensity that consensus seems nearly impossible. Providing a panoramic view of both perspectives, this unique book traces the contested issues to fundamental conceptual differences within the field of religious, scientific, and political studies. Caramagno carefully examines the centuries of thought behind the questions involved and encourages readers to consider the arguments in order to draw their own conclusions. This book is not about the wrongs or rights of the gay-rights debate. Nor is it a condemnation of the sides involved in the debate. Instead, it shows how the two sides have engaged in the battle and how they have marshaled evidence from a variety of sources (often the same ones) to muster public support but without addressing the conceptual changes needed to conduct a more profitable dialog. Treating both sides of the debate respectfully and objectively, Irreconcilable Differences? opens the discussion up so that all ideas and arguments can be understood as having something valuable to bring to the table. In this way, readers are challenged to consider the ways arguments are formed, how culture disseminates ideas, and how a debate can be shaped so that consensus-building is a real, not an imagined, outcome.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
The New Cold War
Group Affiliations and PostConsensus Politics
Religious and Sexual Diversity
Religious Views Past and Present
Biblical Scholarship Texts Errors and Methods
Textual Ambiguities and the Scriptures
The Theological Meaning of Sex
Science and Uncertainty
Diversity within Diversity Postmodern Sexual Identities
Define IIlness Rival Theories of Pathology and ExGay Ministries
Politics and Sexual Diversity
Demonizing the Enemy
Gay Bashing and Social Control
Pluralism versus Dogma Public Spaces and Private Beliefs
The Etiology of Homosexuality Biology andor Culture?
acts African American American anal sex ancient anti-gay groups argues argument believe Bible biblical binary biological bisexual Boswell boys brain butch Catholic century Christian Coalition Church claims condemned conservative cultural define desire erosexual evidence ex-gay experience Falwell father feel female femme Gagnon gay bashing gay rights gay rights debate gays and lesbians gender genes genetic God's Greek Greenberg Hebrew Helminiak heterosexual homo homophobia homosexual human individuals intercourse interpretations issue Jesus Jews lesbian Leviticus LGBTs liberal male marriage masculine meaning moral nature Online posting orthodox Christians partners Pat Robertson Paul person political pro-gay protect psychoanalysts psychological queer Ralph Reed reasons relationships religion religious reported Sambian same-sex sexual scholars Scripture sexual behavior sexual diversity sexual identity sexual orientation sexual relations social society sodomy laws spiritual studies survey texts theology theory tion toevah transgendered translation transsexuals two-spirit unclean University values woman women word