The Coevolutionary Process

Front Cover
University of Chicago Press, Apr 24, 2009 - Science - 383 pages
Traditional ecological approaches to species evolution have frequently studied too few species, relatively small areas, and relatively short time spans. In The Coevolutionary Process, John N. Thompson advances a new conceptual approach to the evolution of species interactions—the geographic mosaic theory of coevolution. Thompson demonstrates how an integrated study of life histories, genetics, and the geographic structure of populations yields a broader understanding of coevolution, or the development of reciprocal adaptations and specializations in interdependent species.

Using examples of species interactions from an enormous range of taxa, Thompson examines how and when extreme specialization evolves in interdependent species and how geographic differences in specialization, adaptation, and the outcomes of interactions shape coevolution. Through the geographic mosaic theory, Thompson bridges the gap between the study of specialization and coevolution in local communities and the study of broader patterns seen in comparisons of the phylogenies of interacting species.
 

Contents

Overview
1
Part I The Entangled Bank
5
Part II The Evolution of Specialization
57
Part III Natural Selection and the Geographic Structure of Specialization
119
Part IV Specialization and Coevolution
201
The Geographic Mosaic in Evolving Interactions
288
Specialization Coevolution and Conservation
292
Literature Cited
296
Index
345
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page 7 - It is interesting to contemplate an entangled bank, clothed with many plants of many kinds, with birds singing on the bushes, with various insects flitting about, and with worms crawling through the damp earth, and to reflect that these elaborately constructed forms, so different from each other, and dependent on each other in so complex a manner, have all been produced by laws acting around us.
Page 7 - It is good thus to try in imagination to give to any one species an advantage over another. Probably in no single instance should we know what to do. This ought to convince us of our ignorance on the mutual relations of all organic beings, a conviction as necessary as it is difficult to acquire.

Bibliographic information