Law and Politics in China's Foreign TradeUpdated papers of a conference held at the Contemporary China Institute, School of Oriental and African Studies, London, 1971, and sponsored by the Subcommittee on Contemporary China of the Social Science Research Council and the American Council of Learned Societies, and Southern Illinois University at Edwardsville, with the cooperation of the Contemporary China Institute. |
Contents
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 21 | |
Arthur A Stahnke | 121 |
Trade with Denmark | 142 |
Trade with Italy | 169 |
Some Aspects of Maritime Law and Practice | 249 |
Ways of Payment in Foreign Trade | 270 |
The Foreign Trade Apparatus | 308 |
State Control of Foreign Trade after Liberation | 330 |
The Old Canton System of Foreign Trade | 360 |
270 | 375 |
Trade and Payments Agreement between the Govern | 381 |
MT Contract Form for Japan Import Dan F Henderson | 416 |
Purchase Contract Alan H Smith | 427 |
| 450 | |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accounts American arbitration Article Asahi shimbun attaché authorities Bank of China bōeki Bureau businessmen buyer Canton Fair CCPIT China trade China's Foreign Trade Chinese exports claim clause COCOM commercial counselor commodities Communist concerning contracts Cultural Revolution currency customs Danish deal diplomatic relations disputes documents economic enterprises established European example exchange favorable FLHP foreign trade organizations friendly firm trade German Hong Kong hong merchants HTFLHP important industrial inspection interest Italian Japan JETRO letters of credit million Ministry of Foreign Moscow MT trade negotiations Nitchū overseas Chinese parties payment Peking People's Bank People's Republic percent period political port practice PRC's problems purchase regulations Renminbi Republic of China rubles seller Sino-Japanese trade Sino-Soviet trade socialist countries Soviet Union standard Taiwan TCCT tion trade agreement transactions treaty United vessels West Germany Western yüan
Popular passages
Page vii - was sponsored by the Subcommittee on Chinese Law of the Joint Committee on Contemporary China of the Social Science Research Council and the American Council of Learned Societies, and by the University of