Insanity : Murder, Madness, and the Law: Murder, Madness, and the Law
Charles Patrick Ewing Professor of Law and Adjunct Professor of Psychology State University of New York at Buffalo
Oxford University Press, Mar 1, 2008 - Psychology - 224 pages
The insanity defense is one of the oldest fixtures of the Anglo-American legal tradition. Though it is available to people charged with virtually any crime, and is often employed without controversy, homicide defendants who raise the insanity defense are often viewed by the public and even the legal system as trying to get away with murder. Often it seems that legal result of an insanity defense is unpredictable, and is determined not by the defendants mental state, but by their lawyers and psychologists influence. From the thousands of murder cases in which defendants have claimed insanity, Doctor Ewing has chosen ten of the most influential and widely varied. Some were successful in their insanity plea, while others were rejected. Some of the defendants remain household names years after the fact, like Jack Ruby, while others were never nationally publicized. Regardless of the circumstances, each case considered here was extremely controversial, hotly contested, and relied heavily on lengthy testimony by expert psychologists and psychiatrists. Several of them played a major role in shaping the criminal justice system as we know it today. In this book, Ewing skillfully conveys the psychological and legal drama of each case, while providing important and fresh professional insights. For the legal or psychological professional, as well as the interested reader, Insanity will take you into the minds of some of the most incomprehensible murderers of our age.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Andrea Yates appeals Arthur Shawcross asked behavior Belli Berkowitz Brief for Defendant-Appellant charged Clark competent to stand convicted crime criminal cross-examination defendant’s defense attorney Derrick diagnosis Dietz disease or defect disorder Eric Smith Eric’s evidence examined extreme emotional disturbance Fitzsimmons forensic forensic psychiatry Gacy Gacy’s Gibbs Goldstein guilty by reason Hegarty homicide hospital Ibid insanity defense Insanity Plea interview Jack Ruby John Wayne Gacy judge jurors Kendra Webdale killed knew Law & Order Lewis M’Naghten Mehl mens rea mental disease mental health experts mental illness murder opinion Panetti paranoid parole personality police officer prison prosecution prosecution’s prosecutor psychiatric psychiatrist psychological psychologist psychomotor psychotic question reason of insanity released response Robert Torsney Ruby’s schizophrenia seizure sentence sexual Shawcross shooting shot stand trial state’s suffered testified testimony Texas told the jury Torsney’s U.S. Supreme Court verdict wrong York