What's Wrong with a Free Lunch?
Philippe van Parijs, Joshua Cohen, Joel Rogers
Beacon Press, 2001 - Education - 137 pages
Our politicians insist that we live in a time of unprecedented prosperity, yet more and more Americans are pointing out that the richest 1% of our society holds more wealth than the bottom 90% put together. In this timely book, economist Philippe Van Parijs has a simple plan for addressing not only poverty but other social ills: everyone would be paid a universal basic income (UBI) at a level sufficient for subsistence. Everyone, including "those who make no social contributionówho spend their mornings bickering with their partner, surf off Malibu in the afternoon, and smoke pot all night."
Van Parijs argues that a UBI would reduce unemployment, improve women's lives, and prevent the environmental damage caused by overproduction and fast growth. At the heart of his proposal is the intention to secure real freedom for all, because it offers the greatest possible opportunity to those with the least opportunities. He acknowledges that an idle surfer might not deserve a UBI, but that the surfer's good luck would be no different than the good fortune enjoyed by those who benefit from the current distribution of resources.
Responses to this controversial proposal vary: Some are in favor of a basic income, but only if it's tied to work. Others find the entire proposal unrealistic and unaffordable. Almost all agree, however, that it is time for us to talk about this issue.
NEW DEMOCRACY FORUM
A series of short paperback originals exploring creative solutions to our most urgent national concerns. The series editors (for Boston Review), Joshua Cohen and Joel Rogers, aim to foster politically engaged, intellectually honest, and morally serious debate about fundamental issuesóboth on and off the agenda of conventional politics.
2 pages matching malibu surfer problem in this book
Results 1-2 of 2
What people are saying - Write a review
achieve Alperovitz Alstott American argue argument Barry believe benefits Brian Barry Bruce Ackerman citizens CLAUS OFFE Condorcet contribution cost countries debate Democracy Forum demogrant distribution earned income economic Edmund Phelps effects elderly employers equal Europe European feasibility full-time fund Galston Goodin growth guaranteed guaranteed minimum income household idea increase individuals inequality institutions labor market least left-libertarian less liberty lives means-tested ment minimum income moral negative income tax normative option Parijs's participation income payments percent person PETER EDELMAN Phelps Philippe Van Parijs political poor poverty poverty line principle problem programs proposal Rawls real freedom real libertarian recipients redistribution reduce requirements sense social justice social policy Social Security society standard strategy subsidies subsistence level surfer tax credit tion tional tive undeserved unemployment United universal basic income WADE RATHKE wage wealth welfare women workfare