What's wrong with a free lunch?

Front Cover
Beacon Press, May 8, 2001 - Business & Economics - 137 pages
2 Reviews
Our politicians insist that we live in a time of unprecedented prosperity, yet more and more Americans are pointing out that the richest 1% of our society holds more wealth than the bottom 90% put together. In this timely book, economist Philippe Van Parijs has a simple plan for addressing not only poverty but other social ills: everyone would be paid a universal basic income (UBI) at a level sufficient for subsistence. Everyone, including "those who make no social contributionówho spend their mornings bickering with their partner, surf off Malibu in the afternoon, and smoke pot all night."

Van Parijs argues that a UBI would reduce unemployment, improve women's lives, and prevent the environmental damage caused by overproduction and fast growth. At the heart of his proposal is the intention to secure real freedom for all, because it offers the greatest possible opportunity to those with the least opportunities. He acknowledges that an idle surfer might not deserve a UBI, but that the surfer's good luck would be no different than the good fortune enjoyed by those who benefit from the current distribution of resources.

Responses to this controversial proposal vary: Some are in favor of a basic income, but only if it's tied to work. Others find the entire proposal unrealistic and unaffordable. Almost all agree, however, that it is time for us to talk about this issue.

NEW DEMOCRACY FORUM
A series of short paperback originals exploring creative solutions to our most urgent national concerns. The series editors (for Boston Review), Joshua Cohen and Joel Rogers, aim to foster politically engaged, intellectually honest, and morally serious debate about fundamental issuesóboth on and off the agenda of conventional politics.

From inside the book

What people are saying - Write a review

Review: What's Wrong With a Free Lunch?

User Review  - Otto Lehto - Goodreads

A concise debate, in the form of select essays and rebuttals, about the feasibility of basic income as an economic and moral policy. Although the issue has been given more breathing room elsewhere ... Read full review

Review: What's Wrong With a Free Lunch?

User Review  - kaity - Goodreads

Universal Basic Income: I'd vote for it. Read full review

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2001)

Cohen is Arthur and Ruth Sloan Professor of Political Science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and Editor in Chief of Boston Review.

Rogers is MacArthur Professor of Law, Political Science, and Sociology at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, and Director of the Center on Winconsin Strategy.