The Anti-slavery ReporterThe Society, 1861 - Slavery New ser., v. 3-8 (1855-1860) include the 16th-21st annual reports of the British and Foreign Anti-slavery Society; v. 9-11 (1861-1863) include the 22nd-24th annual reports. |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
abolished abolition alleged American Anderson Anti-Slavery Reporter Anti-Slavery Society authority believe Britain British and Foreign Canada captured carried Chamerovzow chiefs Coast of Africa colonies coloured committed Committee Confederated Congress constitution Consul Coolies cotton cruisers Cuba declared despatch Digges duty East Coast emancipation England fact favour Federal flag force Foreign Anti-Slavery Society Forster French friends fugitive slave habeas corpus honour House immigration important island issue John Anderson justice King of Dahomey labour Lagos land liberty Lord Brougham Lord John Russell Lordship Majesty's Government ment Missouri Mozambique native negroes North object officers opinion party person port Porto Novo Portuguese present President prisoner Queen's Bench question resolution San Domingo secession sent shew ship slave-trade slaveholders Slavery South Southern Spain Spanish Government suppression Surinam taken territory thing tion trade traffic treaty Union United vessels W. E. FORSTER
Popular passages
Page 102 - I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so.
Page 116 - If thou forbear to deliver them that are drawn unto death, and those that are ready to be slain; If thou sayest, Behold, we knew it not; doth not he that pondereth the heart consider it? and he that keepeth thy soul, doth not he know it? and shall not he render to every man according to his works?
Page 104 - At the same time, the candid citizen must confess that if the policy of the Government upon vital questions affecting the whole people is to be irrevocably fixed by decisions of the Supreme Court, the instant they are made in ordinary litigation between parties in personal actions the people will have ceased to be their own rulers...
Page 5 - That no will shall be valid unless it shall be in writing and executed in manner hereinafter mentioned ; (that is to say), it shall be signed at the foot or end thereof by the testator, or by some other person in his presence and by his direction ; and such signature shall be made or acknowledged by the testator in the presence of two or more witnesses present at the same time, and such witnesses shall attest and shall subscribe the will in the presence of the testator, but no form of attestation...
Page 45 - Provided, that this shall only be done upon such evidence of criminality as, according to the laws of the place where the fugitive or person so charged shall be found, would justify his apprehension and commitment for trial if the crime or offence had there been committed...
Page 103 - The Union is much older than the Constitution. It was formed, in fact, by the Articles of Association in 1774. It was matured and continued by the Declaration of Independence in 1776. It was further matured, and the faith of all the then thirteen States expressly plighted and engaged that it should be perpetual, by the Articles of Confederation in 1778. And, finally, in 1787, one of the declared...
Page 105 - This country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they shall grow weary of the existing Government, they can exercise their constitutional right of amending it, or their revolutionary right to dismember or overthrow it.
Page 104 - All profess to be content in the Union if all constitutional rights can be maintained. Is it true, then, that any right, plainly written in the Constitution, has been denied? I think not. Happily the human mind is so constituted that no party can reach to the audacity of doing this. Think, if you can, of a single instance in which a plainly written provision of the Constitution has ever been denied.
Page 103 - It is safe to assert that no government proper ever had a provision in its organic law for its own termination.
Page 104 - Plainly, the central idea of secession is the essence of anarchy. A majority held in restraint by constitutional checks and limitations, and always changing easily with deliberate changes of popular opinions and sentiments, is the only true sovereign of a free people.