A Theory of the Good and the Right
What would any rational person believe to be worth wanting or working for? Viewed from the standpoint of ethics and empirical psychology, how would such a person define and explain the morally right and the just? And what system of morals would rational people select as the best for the society?
Essential to what is important in traditional philosophical inquiries, these questions and others are pursued in A Theory of the Good and the Right, Richard B. Brandt's now classic work, based on his Oxford lectures.
Using a contemporary psychological theory of action and of motivation, Brandt argues that rational people would choose a utilitarian moral code that the purpose of living should be to strive for the greatest good for the largest number of people. He discusses the concept of welfare, the prospects for the interpersonal comparison and measurement of utility, the implications of the relevant form of rule utilitarianism for the theory of distributive justice, and the possibilities of conflict between utilitarian moral codes and the dictates of self-interest.
Readers interested in moral philosophy, psychology, economics, and political theory will find much to ponder here.
What people are saying - Write a review
WANTING AND PLEASURE
THE COGNITIVE THEORY OF ACTION
18 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
action agent answer attitudes aversions basic behaviour beliefs benefit benevolence certain Chapter choice classical conditioning clear cognitive conception conditioning consider course criticism curve decision definition desires direct discussed effect enjoy enjoyment equal event evidence expectable experience explained fact feel fully rational person further future give given happiness idea ideal identify ignorance important income individual instance interest involved irrational justified kind learning least less matter maximize means moral code moral system morally right motivation normally normative object Obviously occur one's outcomes perform philosophers pleasant pleasure position possible preference present principle probably problem produce promise proposal question rational person reason reflection relevant response result rules seems sense simply situation social society suggested Suppose tend theory thing thought types unpleasant valence welfare wrong