A Comparison of Two Methods Used to Estimate Groundwater Recharge in Dane County, Wisconsin |
Contents
MAPPING THE DISTRIBUTION OF VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL | 13 |
Geomorphic Settings | 22 |
E Results | 36 |
8 other sections not shown
Common terms and phrases
actual addition amount applied aquifer assigned assumed average bedrock elevation bedrock surface calculated capacity Chapter clay deposits cm/s Dane County Dane County Regional defined determine developed discharge areas distribution of recharge Estimates of Hydraulic evapotranspiration exist Figure Formation Geological and Natural geomorphic settings glacial gravel deposits grid groundwater flow model groundwater recharge hydraulic conductivity hydrogeologic units identified inches input lake layer materials maximum Measured Mickelson monthly Natural History Survey net percolation node Paleozoic bedrock units parameters percolation rates Pleistocene potential recharge preparation presented range rates of recharge recharge and discharge recharge areas recharge model recharge rates regional relative representative runoff coefficient sand and gravel sandstone sandy diamicton showing silt and clay soil map units soil moisture storage soil water-balance method specified taken takes place thickness unlithified surficial valleys values water table Wisconsin Geological