Discipline and Practice: The (ir)resistibility of Theory

Front Cover
Stefan Herbrechter, Ivan Callus
Bucknell University Press, 2004 - Literary Collections - 269 pages
0 Reviews
Reviews aren't verified, but Google checks for and removes fake content when it's identified
Has theory become resistible? Has it betrayed its promise, and sold out on its practice? Should theory, after having become a discipline, still lay claims on the radical, or should it embrace its establishment within the university? What future(s) could theory have if there is (dis)agreement about its present(s) and its past(s), and what and how should it from now proceed to read?

What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.


The Case for Cultural Criticism
What is a False Interpretation?
Relevance and Disciplinary Resistance
French ThinkingThinking French In Translation
Giving Taking Leaving Belonging and the Remains of the University
Naive Modernism and the Politics of Embarrassment
From Althusser to Balibar
On the Nature of Language the Epistemology of Modern Science and the Relationship Between the Two Cultures
The Irresistibility of the Posthuman Questioning New Cultural Theory
Notes on Contributors

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page 50 - Derby Day, Henley Regatta, Cowes, the twelfth of August, a cup final, the dog races, the pin table, the dart board, Wensleydale cheese, boiled cabbage cut into sections, beetroot in vinegar, nineteenthcentury Gothic churches and the music of Elgar. 7
Page 49 - We can assert with some confidence that our own period is one of decline; that the standards of culture are lower than they were fifty years ago; and that the evidences of this decline are visible in every department of human activity. I see no reason why the decay of culture should not proceed much further, and why we may not even
Page 48 - the growth and for the survival of culture, If they conflict with any passionate faith of the reader—if, for instance, he finds it shocking that culture and equalitarianism should conflict, if it seems monstrous to him that anyone should have "advantages of birth"—I do not ask him to change his faith, I merely ask him to stop paying lip-service to culture,

Bibliographic information