Divine Hiddenness and Human ReasonIn this clearly written and tightly argued book, J. L. Schellenberg addresses a fundamental yet neglected religious problem. If there is a God, he asks, why is his existence not more obvious? Traditionally, theists have claimed that God is hidden in order to account for the fact that the evidence of his existence is as weak as it is. Schellenberg maintains that, given the understanding of God's moral character to which theists are committed, this claim runs into serious difficulty. There are grounds, the author writes, for thinking that the perfectly loving God of theism would not be hidden, that such a God would put the fact of his existence beyond reasonable nonbelief. Since reasonable nonbelief occurs, Schellenberg argues, it follows that there is here an argument of considerable force for atheism. In developing his claim, Schellenberg carefully examines the relevant views of such theists as Pascal, Butler, Kierkegaard, Hick, and others. He clarifies their suggestions concerning Divine hiddenness and shows how they fall short of providing a rebuttal for the argument he presents. That argument, he concludes, poses a serious challenge to theism, to which contemporary theists must seek to respond. The first full-length treatment of its topic, Divine Hiddenness and Human Reason will be of interest to anyone who has sought to reach a conclusion as to God's existence, and especially to theologians and philosophers of religion. |
Contents
Introduction I | 4 |
Some Epistemic Implications of Divine Love | 17 |
Is a Strong Epistemic Situation in Relation to Theism | 44 |
The Reasonableness of Nonbelief | 58 |
A Summation of the Case | 83 |
S Moral Freedom and Its Requirements | 95 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accept actions actual affairs allow apparently argue argument assume aware belief bring Chapter choice Christian claim clear clearly cognitive concerned conclusion condition consider considerations course described desire discussion Divine doubt epistemic evidence evil example expect fact fail Faith feel follows force freedom give given God's existence grounds Hence Hick hiddenness human important inclined inculpable individuals intellectual interpretation involves justified knowledge latter least less ment moral nature necessary noted notion objection occur particular Pascal passage perfectly loving perhaps personal relationship plausible position possible present Press probable probation problem proposition question reason to suppose reasonable nonbelief reference reject relation relevant religion religious experience remain respect response revealed seek seems seen sense situation sort strong sufficient suggest suppose surely Swinburne temptation theism theistic things tion true truth understanding University wish writes