Highbrow/Lowbrow: The Emergence of Cultural Hierarchy in AmericaIn this unusually wide-ranging study, spanning more than a century and covering such diverse forms of expressive culture as Shakespeare, Central Park, symphonies, jazz, art museums, the Marx Brothers, opera, and vaudeville, a leading cultural historian demonstrates how variable and dynamic cultural boundaries have been and how fragile and recent the cultural categories we have learned to accept as natural and eternal are. For most of the nineteenth century, a wide variety of expressive forms—Shakespearean drama, opera, orchestral music, painting and sculpture, as well as the writings of such authors as Dickens and Longfellow—enjoyed both high cultural status and mass popularity. In the nineteenth century Americans (in addition to whatever specific ethnic, class, and regional cultures they were part of) shared a public culture less hierarchically organized, less fragmented into relatively rigid adjectival groupings than their descendants were to experience. By the twentieth century this cultural eclecticism and openness became increasingly rare. Cultural space was more sharply defined and less flexible than it had been. The theater, once a microcosm of America—housing both the entire spectrum of the population and the complete range of entertainment from tragedy to farce, juggling to ballet, opera to minstrelsy—now fragmented into discrete spaces catering to distinct audiences and separate genres of expressive culture. The same transition occurred in concert halls, opera houses, and museums. A growing chasm between “serious” and “popular,” between “high” and “low” culture came to dominate America’s expressive arts. “If there is a tragedy in this development,” Lawrence Levine comments, “it is not only that millions of Americans were now separated from exposure to such creators as Shakespeare, Beethoven, and Verdi, whom they had enjoyed in various formats for much of the nineteenth century, but also that the rigid cultural categories, once they were in place, made it so difficult for so long for so many to understand the value and importance of the popular art forms that were all around them. Too many of those who considered themselves educated and cultured lost for a significant period—and many have still not regained—their ability to discriminate independently, to sort things out for themselves and understand that simply because a form of expressive culture was widely accessible and highly popular it was not therefore necessarily devoid of any redeeming value or artistic merit.” In this innovative historical exploration, Levine not only traces the emergence of such familiar categories as highbrow and lowbrow at the turn of the century, but helps us to understand more clearly both the process of cultural change and the nature of culture in American society. |
What people are saying - Write a review
Reviews aren't verified, but Google checks for and removes fake content when it's identified
LibraryThing Review
User Review - DarthDeverell - LibraryThingIn Highbrow/Lowbrow: The Emergence of Cultural Hierarchy in America, Lawrence W. Levine writes, “The idea that Americans, long after they declared their political independence, retained a colonial ... Read full review
Highbrow/lowbrow: the emergence of cultural hierarchy in America
User Review - Not Available - Book VerdictLevine contends that early 19th-century America was characterized by no rigid cultural divisions between elite and mass culture. By the later part of the century, however, a clear line had been drawn ... Read full review
Other editions - View all
Highbrow/Lowbrow: The Emergence of Cultural Hierarchy in America Lawrence Levine Limited preview - 1990 |
Highbrow/Lowbrow: The Emergence of Cultural Hierarchy in America Lawrence W. LEVINE Limited preview - 2009 |
Common terms and phrases
actor American appeared artist attempted audience became become Boston called Central changes chap Charles Chicago City Civil classical close common composers concerts concluded conductor continued created critic culture drama Dwight early English established expressive fact feel final followed force forms gallery George groups half Hall Hamlet helped Henry Higginson History important insisted institutions Italian James January John Journal language late less Library living Magazine March masses means mind Monthly Museum musicians nature never nineteenth century noted observed Opera House Orleans Park performance person Philadelphia play popular presented productions quoted reported Richard scenes sense Shake Shakespeare shared social society soprano Sousa stage streets Strong Symphony Orchestra taste theater Theodore Thomas things Thomas turn understand United University wrote York young