Ill Effects: The Media/violence DebateMartin Barker, Julian Petley How do the media really affect people? Can cinema, television and video be blamed for problems in society? Are young people as vulnerable to the influences of 'video nasties' and horror movies as is often claimed? Ill Effects is a radical re-examination of the whole 'media effects' debate. It questions not only whether the media are capable of directly influencing people but also whether the idea of 'effects' is the most useful way of conceptualising the relationship between the media and audiences. Ill Effects looks at the reasons why the media are routinely blamed for horrific events such as the murders of James Bulger and Suzanne Capper and the Hungerford massacre, as well as for perceived trends such as the alleged 'death of the family' and the rise of 'yob culture'. The authors' concern goes beyond individual cases: they discuss the development and current state of play of research into media effects, the remarkable power of 'common sense' notions of media effects and the way in which the effects issue has become embroiled in debates about censorship and freedom of expression. They suggest how audiences really respond to media texts, and argue that there is an urgent need for informed and interdisciplinary approaches to the study of the media. |
Contents
Introduction | 1 |
1 The Newson Report | 11 |
2 Electronic child abuse? | 28 |
3 Living for libido or Childs Play IV | 41 |
4 I was a teenage horror fan | 48 |
5 Reservoirs of dogma | 56 |
6 Us and them | 74 |
7 Television violence redux | 87 |
8 The dangerous psychologic of media effects | 106 |
9 On going public | 125 |
| 141 | |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
academic adult advertising aggressive American anti-social argued argument audience Barker BBFC become behaviour Behaviourist boys British broadcasting Buckingham campaigners Castle of Frankenstein causal cause censorship child Child's Play childhood Chucky cinema claims comics communication research concern crime critical dangerous David Alton debate evidence Evil Dead example Exorcist experience fact fear Film Censorship genre harmful hooliganism horror fan horror film imagery images impact industry influence interest interviews issues James Bulger James Bulger murder James Ferman journalists kinds London Mark Kermode mass media material meaning media effects media influence media violence messages moral murder of James narrative Newson newspapers NIMH on-screen parents particular penny dreadfuls political problem programme protect psychological question response screen violence seen sense simply society story studies Surgeon General’s television violence theory tradition underclass video nasties Video Violence Video Watchdog viewers viewing violent videos watch young offenders



