In Government We Trust: Market-Failure and the Delusions of Privatisation
Pluto Press, Oct 15, 2009 - Business & Economics - 336 pages
Neoliberalism has had a huge impact on our lives over the past three decades, convincing governments in liberal democratic states to transform themselves and society according to the values and practices of the market.
In Government We Trust examines these promises within the context of market failures in services relinquished to the private sector by governments. Using prominent examples such as the collapse of Railtrack in the UK, the energy crisis in the US and the Sydney water treatment scandal in Australia, it exposes the level of risk which remains with government after privatisation, requiring them to resume responsibility when the private sector fails.
The authors show how these failures reveal the benefits of government intervention and the dangers of unfettered markets. They argue that these problems confirm that there are some things only governments can and should do.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
The benevolence of the butcher? selfinterest vs public interest
The proper ends of government
4 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
In Government We Trust: Market Failure and the Delusions of Privatisation
Warwick N. Funnell,Robert Jupe,Jane Andrew
No preview available - 2009
According accountability action activities allowed argued Australia authorities become belief benefits Britain British cent centre century citizens Committee Commons companies competition concern consequences Conservative consumers continued contract contractor Correctional costs created critical dependent deregulation Despite economic effective efficiency electricity Energy ensure especially example expected failed failure forced freedom further greater House important improve increased individuals industry infrastructure interest investment involved Labour less liberal limits lives major means ment million nature neoliberal operating performance political possible private prisons private sector privatisation problems profit protect public interest public sector public services rail Railtrack railway reduce reform regulation regulatory responsibility result risk role safety Select self-interest share significant Smith social society successful supply tion train Transport United utilities values