This book examines the concept of intersectional discrimination and why it has been difficult for jurisdictions around the world to redress it in discrimination law. 'Intersectionality' was coined by Kimberle Crenshaw in 1989. Thirty years since its conception, the term has become a buzzword in sociology, anthropology, feminist studies, psychology, literature, and politics. But it remains marginal in the discourse of discrimination law, where it was first conceived. Traversing its long and rich history of development, the book explains what intersectionality is as a theory and as a category of discrimination. It then explains what it takes for discrimination law to be reimagined from the perspective of intersectionality in reference to comparative laws in the US, UK, South Africa, Canada, India, and the jurisprudence of the European Courts (CJEU and ECtHR) and international human rights treaty bodies.
Other editions - View all
actually analogous analysis applied appreciation approach argued associated ation basis Black women burden Canada Canadian caste cause chapter claim claimant combination Committee comparator complex conceptual considered Constitution context crimination Dalit Dalit women defined developed direct disability discrim discrimination based discrimination law distinct effect employment Equality establishing evidence example exclusion experiences explained fact feminism Feminist forms framework gender group disadvantage hereafter Human Rights Ibid identities impact India indirect individual inter interpreted intersectional claims intersectional discrimination intersectionality justification limited marriages matter means multiple grounds Muslim nature particular patterns of group persons political position possibility practice protected Quebec Attorney race race and sex reason recognized reference relation religion remedies respect Review sexual sexual orientation similar single single-axis social South African specific status structures substantive suffered Supreme Court theory thinking transformative treatment understanding United whole woman wrong