Misbehaving Science: Controversy and the Development of Behavior Genetics
Behavior genetics has always been a breeding ground for controversies. From the “criminal chromosome” to the “gay gene,” claims about the influence of genes like these have led to often vitriolic national debates about race, class, and inequality. Many behavior geneticists have encountered accusations of racism and have had their scientific authority and credibility questioned, ruining reputations, and threatening their access to coveted resources.
In Misbehaving Science, Aaron Panofsky traces the field of behavior genetics back to its origins in the 1950s, telling the story through close looks at five major controversies. In the process, Panofsky argues that persistent, ungovernable controversy in behavior genetics is due to the broken hierarchies within the field. All authority and scientific norms are questioned, while the absence of unanimously accepted methods and theories leaves a foundationless field, where disorder is ongoing. Critics charge behavior geneticists with political motivations; champions say they merely follow the data where they lead. But Panofsky shows how pragmatic coping with repeated controversies drives their scientific actions. Ironically, behavior geneticists’ struggles for scientific authority and efforts to deal with the threats to their legitimacy and autonomy have made controversy inevitable—and in some ways essential—to the study of behavior genetics.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Chapter 1 Studying Misbehaving Science
Chapter 2 Founding the Field to Avoid Controversy
The Race and IQ Controversy
Chapter 4 Animals or Humans to Study Behavior? Conflict over the Shape of the Field
Valorizing Controversial Science
Chapter 6 From Behavior Genetics to Genomics
animal behavior geneticists animal researchers anomie argued argument Arthur Jensen Association became behav behavior genetics Behavior Genetics Association Bell Curve biological Bourdieu chapter cists claims conflict critics critique crucial cultural debate disciplinary Dobzhansky efforts ence engage environment environmental eugenics example field field’s focused funding genes genetic determinism genome havior hereditarian heritability estimates Herrnstein human behavior human researchers icists ideas implications individual institutions intellectual intelligence interest Interviewee 35 ior geneticists ior genetics IQ controversy Jensen Kamin Leon Kamin Lewontin Lindzey linked Loehlin ment mental misbehaving science molecular geneticists molecular genetics nature versus nurture Nelkin neoliberalism neticists netics neuroscience norms participants Plomin political population practices problems produce provocative psychiatric Psychological behavior psychologists race differences racial differences racist responsibility Richard Lewontin Robert Plomin Rushton Sandra Scarr Scarr scientific capital scientific racism scientists Shockley social sociologist Spuhler structure studies Tabery tion traits twins