Moral Inquiries on the Situation of Man and of Brutes
Inventor, feminist, humanitarian and founder of the RSPCA, Gompertz argued for a rational morality in our treatment of both humans and animals. He has been compared with Leonardo and Pythagoras in the range of his abilities and thinking. Inventor of the expanding chuck and of 37 other recorded devices, many designed to reduce animal suffering, he renounced flesh, eggs, milk, leather and silk, condemned vivisection and would not ride in a horse-drawn coach. Convinced of the similitude between man and other animals, his championing of those weaker than ourselves places him high in the history of the humane movement.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Foreword by Peter Singer
7 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
abstain absurd actions admit animal food animals for food appears assert attempt Axiom become benefit body British Museum carnivorous cauliflowers cause CENTAUR circumstances committed conceive consequence consider court-martial crime Cruelty to Animals death degree depend deprived destroy destruction disease effect encourage enjoyment equal evil exertion exist fault fecundity feelings flesh former frequently further give Gompertz guilty happiness horses human idea ill-treat improvement increase individual inflicting infre injury innocent insects instance judgement justice kill kind knowledge labour laws less lives magistrate mankind manner means mind misery Moral Inquiries mortification nature necessary necessity object observed offence opinion pain perform perhaps personal identity Peter Singer pleasure possess prevent produce proved punishment purpose qualities reason recollect render seems sensation share sheep skin slaughter spider strength substance suffer suppose tallow Theorem thing tion unslaughtered meat vegetables virtue whole species wolves wool wrong