Nuclear Entrapment: THORP and the Politics of Commitment |
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
Introduction | 1 |
the 1960s to the 1980s | 7 |
German Japan the | 40 |
THORP and BNFLs relations with domestic institutions | 58 |
Why was THORPs authorisation not routine? | 72 |
The Governments internal appraisal | 79 |
Why was public opposition to THORP so unsuccessful? | 99 |
Parliament the decision and the judicial | 107 |
1994 to 1999 | 116 |
Predicaments causes and remedies | 128 |
Where next with THORP? | 152 |
Glossary | 158 |
Common terms and phrases
accepted activities Agreement allowed analysis approved assessment authorisation became become benefits BNFL BNFL's Britain British carried civil commitments Committee Company concerns considered construction consultation contracts costs countries customers debate decision Department difficulties discussion disposal early economic effect electricity Energy Environment especially established facility foreign France future gain German given Government Government's Greenpeace House important industry inquiry institutions interest involved issues Japan Japanese Justice Magnox materials matters Ministers MOX fuel negotiated nuclear nuclear power Office operation option outcome Parliament parties plans plant plutonium political privatisation problems production programme proposals question Radioactive reactors reason regarded relations remain Report reprocessing responsibility risks safeguards Secretary Sellafield spent fuel storage stored strategy supply taken THORP transportation United utilities waste weapon Windscale