Reading Humanitarian Intervention: Human Rights and the Use of Force in International Law

Front Cover
Cambridge University Press, Jun 26, 2003 - Law
During the 1990s, humanitarian intervention seemed to promise a world in which democracy, self-determination and human rights would be privileged over national interests or imperial ambitions. Orford provides critical readings of the narratives that accompanied such interventions and shaped legal justifications for the use of force by the international community. Through a close reading of legal texts and institutional practice, she argues that a far more circumscribed, exploitative and conservative interpretation of the ends of intervention was adopted during this period. The book draws on a wide range of sources, including critical legal theory, feminist and postcolonial theory, psychoanalytic theory and critical geography, to develop ways of reading directed at thinking through the cultural and economic effects of militarized humanitarianism. The book concludes by asking what, if anything, has been lost in the move from the era of humanitarian intervention to an international relations dominated by wars on terror.
 

What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.

Contents

2 Misreading the texts of international law
38
the imaginative geography of humanitarian intervention
82
the international community and postconflict reconstruction
126
colonial stereotypes and humanitarian narratives
158
6 Dreams of human rights
186
Bibliography
220
Index
236
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2003)

Anne Orford is Senior Lecturer in the Law School at the University of Melbourne.

Bibliographic information