The Great War: Myth and MemoryThe First World War, with its mud and the slaughter of the trenches, is often taken as the ultimate example of the futility of war. Generals, safe in their headquarters behind the lines, sent millions of men to their deaths to gain a few hundred yards of ground. Writers, notably Siegfried Sassoon and Wilfred Owen, provided unforgettable images of the idiocy and tragedy of the war. Yet this vision of the war is at best a partial one, the war only achieving its status as the worst of wars in the last thirty years. At the time, the war aroused emotions of pride and patriotism. Not everyone involved remembered the war only for its miseries. The generals were often highly professional and indeed won the war in 1918. In this original and challenging book, Dan Todman shows views of the war have changed over the last ninety years and how a distorted image of it emerged and became dominant. |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accounts apparent army attitudes audience Battle became become beliefs Britain British Britons century Command commemoration context continued criticisms culture dead death early effect emotional encouraged example experience fact Field fighting forces fought German Haig hand Hart historians History horror important individual interest involvement killed less letters Liddell lives London look loss Lovely March mean meant Memory military myths nature never novels November officers Owen Oxford participation particular past play poems political popular position produced programme published reaction readers record remained remembrance representation represented result Review Second World seems seen social soldiers Somme story success suffered suggested television tion trench understanding veterans Victory wars wartime Western Front Whilst women writing wrote young