TO THE HISTORY OF LORD SEATON'S REGIMENT ( THE 52ND LIGHT INFANTRY,) AT THE BATTLE OF WATERLOO, BY THE REV. WILLIAM LEEKE, M.A., (OF QUEEN'S COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE,) INCUMBENT OF HOLBROOKE, DERBYSHIRE, AND RURAL DEAN, WHO CARRIED THE 52ND REGIMENTAL COLOUR AT WATERLOO. THE AUTHOR CLAIMS FOR LORD SEATON AND THE 52ND THE HONOUR OF HAVING DEFEATED, SINGLE-HANDED, WITHOUT THE PORTION OF THE IMPERIAL GUARD OF FRANCE, ABOUT 10,000 POSITION, WHICH DEFEAT WAS IMMEDIATELY THE SUPPLEMENT CONTAINS MR. LEEKE'S REPLIES TO THE CRITICISMS OF THE RELATING TO THE CRISIS AND CLOSE OF THE ACTION. LONDON: HATCHARDS, 187, PICCADILLY ; MDCCCLXXI. THREE LETTERS reprinted from the Army and Navy Gazette of 1867, being Mr. Leeke's replies to the criticisms of Officers of the Guards and others on his “ History of the 52nd Light Infantry at Waterloo. Colonel Chesney's strong expressions about the 52nd, and Sir Misquotation by Colonel Chesney Captain Siborne's difficulties and mistakes. His remarkable expressions with regard to the Mixed Skirmishers 47 The French General Foy fixes the time of the Defeat of the Corrected positions of the Guards and Light Brigade on the Regimental Rank of the Guards and Line All the Line Regiments to be Light Regiments Red the proper Uniform for the British Army. Explosive Bullets, and Lancers Concentration of the Charges of Canister and Grape. Guns of the Old Guard driven off by the Right Section of the 52nd 58 The unfounded claim of Prussia to the Victory Testimony of Lieut. Pattison, of the 33rd. The Pall Mall, on the Duke and the 52nd at Waterloo Lord Seaton's Letter after the Battle Lord Seaton's feelings on the omission of all mention of the 52nd ERRATA. read 66 reverse.'' " |