The Rejection of Continental Drift: Theory and Method in American Earth Science

Front Cover
Oxford University Press, Apr 1, 1999 - Science - 432 pages
1 Review
In the early twentieth century, American earth scientists were united in their opposition to the new--and highly radical--notion of continental drift, even going so far as to label the theory "unscientific." Some fifty years later, however, continental drift was heralded as a major scientific breakthrough and today it is accepted as scientific fact. Why did American geologists reject so adamantly an idea that is now considered a cornerstone of the discipline? And why were their European colleagues receptive to it so much earlier? This book, based on extensive archival research on three continents, provides important new answers while giving the first detailed account of the American geological community in the first half of the century. Challenging previous historical work on this episode, Naomi Oreskes shows that continental drift was not rejected for the lack of a causal mechanism, but because it seemed to conflict with the basic standards of practice in American geology. This account provides a compelling look at how scientific ideas are made and unmade.

What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.


The Instability of Scientific Truth
Not the Mechanism
Theory and Method
A Revolution in Acceptance
Utility and Truth

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page 13 - The effects must themselves teach us the nature and intensity of the causes which have operated ; and we are in danger of error, if we seek for slow and shun violent agencies further than the facts naturally direct us, no less than if we were parsimonious of time and prodigal of violence.

References to this book

All Book Search results »

Bibliographic information