The Field Guide to Understanding Human Error
When faced with a human error problem, you may be tempted to ask 'Why didn't they watch out better? How could they not have noticed?'. You think you can solve your human error problem by telling people to be more careful, by reprimanding the miscreants, by issuing a new rule or procedure. These are all expressions of 'The Bad Apple Theory', where you believe your system is basically safe if it were not for those few unreliable people in it. This old view of human error is increasingly outdated and will lead you nowhere. The new view, in contrast, understands that a human error problem is actually an organizational problem. Finding a 'human error' by any other name, or by any other human, is only the beginning of your journey, not a convenient conclusion. The new view recognizes that systems are inherent trade-offs between safety and other pressures (for example: production). People need to create safety through practice, at all levels of an organization. Breaking new ground beyond its successful predecessor, The Field Guide to Understanding Human Error guides you through the traps and misconceptions of the old view. It explains how to avoid the hindsight bias, to zoom out from the people closest in time and place to the mishap, and resist the temptation of counterfactual reasoning and judgmental language. But it also helps you look forward. It suggests how to apply the new view in building your safety department, handling questions about accountability, and constructing meaningful countermeasures. It even helps you in getting your organization to adopt the new view and improve its learning from failure.
What people are saying - Write a review
LibraryThing ReviewUser Review - MikePearce - LibraryThing
This book is an absolute must read for anyone "in charge of" or responsible for people. Superb view on "human error". Read full review
LibraryThing ReviewUser Review - librarymary09 - LibraryThing
Fascinating and very interesting! Read full review
The Bad Apple Theory
The New View of Human Error
The Hindsight Bias
Put Data in Context
They Should Have
Trade Indignation for Explanation
Sharp or Blunt End?
You Cant Count Errors
Leave a Trace
So What Went Wrong?
Look into the Organization
Abandon the Fallacy of a Quick Fix
What about People s Own Responsibility?
Making Your Safety Department Work
How to Adopt the New View
Other editions - View all
accident model actually Air Ontario air traffic control aircraft airline assessments and actions automation surprises aviation Bad Apple Theory basically safe behavior Chapter cognitive complacency complex Computers context conversation analysis counterfactual countermeasures create safety crew resource management decisions deeper effect evidence example explain Field Guide flight fuel goal conflicts happened hindsight hindsight bias human error problem human factors human performance incident inside interaction International Herald Tribune investigation knowledge label learning from failure look mishap mismatch monitoring Murphy's law Old View operators organization organizational outcome people's pilots practice practitioners procedures production pressures progress on safety reactions to failure recommendations responsibility risk runway safety culture safety department safety-critical sense sequence of events sharp end situation awareness story systemic accident talk tasks things timeline trade-offs trying typically understand human error want to understand windshear workload wrong