When Cooperation Fails: The International Law and Politics of Genetically Modified Foods
The transatlantic dispute over genetically modified organisms (GMOs) has brought into conflict the United States and the European Union, two long-time allies and economically interdependent democracies with a long record of successful cooperation. Yet the dispute - pitting a largely acceptant US against an EU deeply suspicious of GMOs - has developed into one of the most bitter and intractable transatlantic and global conflicts, resisting efforts at negotiated resolution andresulting in a bitterly contested legal battle before the World Trade Organization.Professors Pollack and Shaffer investigate the obstacles to reconciling regulatory differences among nations through international cooperation, using the lens of the GMO dispute. The book addresses the dynamic interactions of domestic law and politics, transnational networks, international regimes, and global markets, through a theoretically grounded and empirically comprehensive analysis of the governance of GM foods and crops. They demonstrate that the deeply politicized, entrenched andpath-dependent nature of the regulation of GMOs in the US and the EU has fundamentally shaped negotiations and decision-making at the international level, limiting the prospects for deliberation and providing incentives for both sides to engage in hard bargaining and to "shop" for favorable internationalforums. They then assess the impacts, and the limits, of international pressures on domestic US and European law, politics and business practice, which have remained strikingly resistant to change.International cooperation in areas like GMO regulation, the authors conclude, must overcome multiple obstacles, legal and political, domestic and international. Any effective response to this persistent dispute, they argue, must recognize both the obstacles to successful cooperation, and the options that remain for each side when cooperation fails.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Biotechnology Risk Regulation and the Failure of Cooperation
Why the US and EU Biotech Regulatory Regimes Differ
3 The Promise and Failure of Transatlantic Regulatory Cooperation through Networks
4 Deliberation or Bargaining? Distributive Conflict and the Fragmented International Regime Complex
Change Continuity and Lack of Convergence
Other editions - View all
actors adopted agencies agricultural biotech agricultural biotechnology animals APHIS Appellate Body approach approval argue authority bans bilateral Biosafety Protocol biotech challenge Chapter Codex Alimentarius Commission comitology Commission’s committee constitute consumer Council decision decision-making deliberation deliberative developing countries dispute-settlement domestic effects EFSA environment environmental EU’s European Commission European Report export farmers food safety foods and crops genetically engineered genetically modified global GM crops GM foods GM products GM varieties GMO regulation GMOs groups impact Inside US Trade institutional international law international regimes IPPC issues labeling legislation maize member-state Monsanto moratorium multilateral regimes negotiations networks OECD officials Organization Pew Initiative plant political potential precautionary principle procedures regime complex regulatory framework regulatory system requirements risk assessment risk management risk regulation role rules Shaffer interview soft law SPS Agreement SPS measures standards substantive tion transatlantic USDA WTO judicial WTO panel