Arab Uprisings and Armed Forces: Between Openness and Resistance
Since late 2010, an unprecedented wave of protests has swept across much of the Arab world. The aim of this paper is to examine the role of the armed forces when confronted with anti-regime uprisings that demand greater political freedoms or even regime change. Drawing on the cases of Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, Bahrain, Yemen and Syria, it argues that the degree of institutionalization of the armed forces and their relationship to society at large can account for different responses to pro-reform uprisings.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
According anti-regime movement apparatus Arab Arab countries argued army army’s autocratic Bahrain called cent challenge characterised civil civil-military relations civilian close commanders compared conscription continued corruption countries country’s defections demands democratic demonstrations described developed Egypt Egyptian armed forces elements elite establishment estimated example explained fact factors February Following foreign former fracturing hand highly important institution institutionalisation International Crisis Group killed leader leadership least level of institutionalisation Libya limited March Middle East military Moreover Mubarak nature North Africa officers openness opposition particular patrimonial played political political system popular uprising population president Press pro-reform movements professional protesters Qaddafi reforms regime region regular relationship relatively remain Report reportedly response result role rule sectarian security forces sided society society at large soldiers strong success suppressed Syrian tribal tribes Tunisian ultimately units weak Yemen