Page images
PDF
EPUB

all of which being moved for and read,

Mr. Jones rofe to speak, when the fpeaker informed him, that it would be on the queftion of his leaving the chair that he might make any obfervations or oppofition he thought proper.

The chancellor of the exchequer faid, as the prefent was a queftion which arofe out of a measure propofed by the houfe originally, and afterwards particularly recommended to his majesty, in which recommendation the house had exprefsly pledged themfelves, that if the propofitions fhould prove agreeable to the people and parliament of Ireland, they would then follow them up with fuch after proceedings as fhould be deemed neceffary for the fecuring, on the moft folid foundation, the happiness and profperity of the whole empire: he therefore hoped that the honourable gentleman would not think of making any oppofition to the fpeaker's leaving the chair. That was a motion made only for the purpose of the houfe refolving itfelf into a committee of the whole houfe, that each member might have an opportunity to deliver his fentiments upon the fubject.

Mr. Jones made a few obfervations in explanation; after which the queftion of the fpeaker's leaving the chair was put, and carried without a divifion.

The houfe then refolved itfelf into a committee of the whole houfe; Mr. Silvefter Douglas in the chair.

The chancellor of the exchequer rofe and faid, that the fentiments of both houses had been fo clearly and fo decifively expreffed in the vote which had been given on this important fubject, during the laft feffion of parliament, that he felt it unneceflary to renew the arguments advanced and acceded to with re

fpect to the advantage, expedience, and neceffity of the measure: he, therefore, fhould only trouble the committee fo far as to recall to their minds the magnitude of the question which was then fubmitted to their confideration, and to remind them, that it was not one partial confideration which claimed their attention, but a confideration in which the dearest and most effential interests of both countries were most intimately connected. The great object was to communicate to Ireland a fair participation in the resources and profperity of Great Britain, by transferring to it a fhare and just proportion of that capital and induftry which, he faid, had raised this nation to its prefent power and opulence.

He trufted the committee would feel no difficulty in agreeing with him, that it was not any feparate, detached, or limited arrangement to which they were bound to direct their attention, but to the aggregate and collective fyftem of incorporative union in all its branches and relations: he, therefore, would not trouble the committee any further, than by taking a fhort review of the propofitions refpecting the union which had been agreed to by the parliament of Ireland, and which were founded upon the refolutions that had already paffed both houses here. In the first article of the union which prefented itself, there was nothing new but the date and regulation of formal notice. the fecond, refpecting the fucceffion of the imperial crowns of both kingdoms, the terms, he faid, were precifely the fame as in the refolution which paffed that and the other houfe: and the third merely related to the united reprefentation of both countries, and the title which it was to take. The other arrangements

In

were

were unquestionably of a more important nature, and might be divided into five leading branches-the legiflature, the church, commercial regulations, contributions to the exigencies of the empire, and the courts of juftice. In looking at thefe various articles, he would requeft gentlemen to compare them with the refolutions to which they had already agreed. They would recollect they had agreed that the united kingdom fhould be reprefented in one and the fame parliament, and that the number of members reprefenting Iteland fhould be fixed by the parliament of that country. They were now, he faid, by his majefty's meffage, put in poffeffion of the difcuffion of the Irifh legiflature, and were required to give their opinion on the article relative to the fhare which Ireland was to have in the component parts of the parliament of the united kingdom. The firft queftion to which he would call their attention was, to inquire whether the refolution of the Irish parliament, on the article of reprefentation, was fuch as they ought to fanction. He admitted the difficulty of obtaining grounds fufficiently clear and conclufive to enable them to decide what the exact number ought to be. Yet as a number was to be abfolutely fixed, it followed, they must adopt fome principle as the bafis of their determination, and he knew of none fuperior to that which had been reforted to in the legislature of Ireland. The principle established by them was founded upon a comparative ftatement of the population of both kingdoms, as well as the revenue of both. The number of members fixed for the counties and two principal cities was fixty-eight, and thofe for the moft confiderable cities, towns, and boroughs, were regulated at thirty-one, who would be felected without partiality. Hav.

ing adverted to the article refpecting the number of reprefentatives for the commons of Ireland, on the ground that they could afford no caufe of fufpicion as to any increafe of the influence of the crown, he next adverted to the arrangements refpecting the house of peers and the members to be returned, and faid, as the members for the com'mons of Ireland were nearly double in number to thofe of Scotland, the fame rule would be observed with the peerage, which, therefore, was to confit of thirty-two members. It was alfo understood, that fuch peers of Ireland as might not be among the twenty-eight temporal peers thould be allowed to fit in the united parliament untilelected. Such a measure, in his opinion, could not be thought unconftitutional. With refpect to the article providing for the fecurity of the church, he flould only obferve, that no danger was likely to affail it, when incorporated with our own. With regard to trade and its alteration, when it could be done without giving a flock to exifting capital, it ought to be extended to all the empire.

The next article, and the only one confifting of minute details, related to apportioning the thares of the revenue of each country refpectively. He faid it was a circumstance much to be wifhed, that the finances of both countries were fo nearly alike, that the fyftem of both could be identified; but, as from the different proportions of debt, and the different ftages of civilization and commerce, and the different wealth of the countries, that defirable object was rendered impracticable, at least for fome time to come, it therefore became an important queftion, Would they defer the advantage of the union, because they could not at once carry it to the extent they could with? Or would they deler

it until, by the increase of the debt of England, through the means of the finking fund, the two countries had fo far approximated to each other that an identity of finance might be established in the first inftance? The next articles which remained were fuch, that he thought no objection could be made to them; they related merely to the purpofes of agriculture, and some charitable inftitutions. The only one which he thought neceffary to trouble the committee with related to the prefervation of the courts, civil, military, and maritime, except as they might hereafter be regulated by the imperial parliament. After fome general obfervations upon the whole, he concluded by propofing the articles voted by the Irifh parliament for the adoption of the

committee.

Mr. Grey faid, it was not his intention to follow the right honourable gentleman through the reafoning he had adduced in fupport of the meafure; he fhould chiefly confine himself to ftate what was neglected to be urged laft year, to object to the principle of the meafure, and the time in which it was brought forward. It was ftated in the meffage of the lord-lieutenant, that the only ground on which the meafure could pafs was a change in the opinion of the public. And it was afterwards ftated, in a fpeech of the lord-lieutenant to the Irish parliament, and more clearly and pofitively in the fpeech of the minifter, that five-fevenths of the country, and all the principal commercial towns, except Dublin, had petitioned in favour of the union. The way in which it was attempted to be made out that five-fevenths of the country had petitioned for the union, was by faying that nineteen counties had, and that thefe counties conftitute

five-fevenths of the furface of Ireland. That petitions were prefented from feveral different counties he would not deny; but by what means were they obtained, and by whom were they figned? The lord-lieutenant, who, befides being the chief civil magiftrate in the kingdom, is commander of a difciplined army of 170,000 men, who is able to proclaim martial-law when he pleases, and to establish the arbitrary trial of a court martial, in his progrefs through the kingdom procured thefe petitions, which he faid were figned by few names, and thofe by no means the most refpectable. Fortunately, faid Mr. Grey, there were many petitions on the other fide, which were not obtained by folicitation, and at illegal meetings, but at public affemblies, of which legal notice had been given. Twenty-feven counties had petitioned against the measure: the petition from the county of Down was figned by 17,000 refpectable independent men; and all others were in a fimilar proportion. Upon this Mr. Grey spoke at fome length, and begged the attention of the committee while he adverted to fome of the favourite arguments of the unionifts. Their grand fource of argument, he faid, was the experience of the benefits derived from the union with Scotland. He had attended to that point, and he could fay, after the moft mature deliberation, that he could fee no analogy between the circumftances of the Scotch union, and those which called for a union with Ireland, nor could he apprehend that the same confequences would follow from them. In the union between Scotland and England there was no phyfical impediment: the relative fituation of the two countries was fuch, that the king himself could administer the executive government in both;

Land

and there was no occafion for a separate establishment being kept up in each. The great difference, faid Mr. Grey, between Scotland and England, was not between people and people, but between parliament and parliament. The Scotch had prohibited the import ation of English goods into Scotland; they had established a trading company, which interfered with the colonial arrangements of England, and nearly embroiled her with Spain; they had refufed to limit the fucceffion of the crown; and had even enacted, that it fhould not defcend to the fame perfon with the crown of England. An act was about to have been brought into the English parliament to render all Scotsmen aliens, and another to fit out a fleet to attack all Scotch veffels they fhould fall in with. Here, Mr. Grey obferved, there was no alternative but union or war. The next obfervation Mr. Grey made was relative to the catholics of Ireland, he faid it were to be wifhed that the catholics should be diftinctly informed what advantages they were to expect. If the privileges held out to them were futhcient to conciliate their fupport to the measure, he did not fee the wisdom of infinuating to them vague hopes of future benefits. "Indeed," faid Mr. Grey, "we know that the keeper of the king's confcience in the fifter kingdom had given it as his opinion, that the claims of the catholics of Ireland could not be granted by his majesty, without a violation of his coronation oath." If the union fhould take place, notwithstanding the general difapprobation of the people, he wifhed that it might tend to ftrengthen the connexion between the two countries, as much as he believed in his confcience that it threatened the enly folid bond of connexion, that

of affection and kindnefs; and that it must prove injurious to the real power of the ftate. Mr. Grey concluded by moving, "That an hum"ble addrefs be prefented to his ma"jefty, that he would be graciously "pleafed to direct his minifters to "fufpend all proceedings on the "Irish union, till the fentiments of "the Irith people refpecting that "measure could be afcertained."

Mr. Johnston spoke in favour of the measure at fome length; and concluded by faying, that he cordially concurred in the vote that had been propofed by the right honourable gentleman.

Colonel Loftus wifhed to fet an honourable gentleman (Mr. Grey) right with refpect to his obfervation; viz. that many English officers were introduced into the Irish house of commons, without their having any connexion, either by property or otherwife, with Ireland.' He inftanced general Craddock, and other officers, as exceptions to that affertion.

Mr. Grey fpoke in explanation, and faid, when he obferved that a general and feveral officers of the ftaff had been introduced into the Irish parliament without its appearing that they had any connexion with that country, he confeffed that he alluded principally to general Lake.

Doctor Lawrence spoke against the measure.

Mr. Sheridan faid, that it appeared now to be fairly understood, that the chancellor of the exchequer had brought the queftion to this iffue, that the measure of the union fhould be perfifted in, because it was courted and fanctioned by the general and independent affent of the Irish people; and that, as this point was afcertained or difproved, the measure fhould be perfevered in or abandoned. But where was

the proof that the union had that general approbation, that independent affent of the Irish nation? A number of addrefles and declarations were mentioned as a proof; but where were thofe addreiles? The addreffes againft were eafy to be found. If the measure was to be carried thus, he had no hefitation in faying that it was an act of tyranny and oppreffion, and must become the fatal fource of new difcontents and future rebellions.

Mr. Dundas faid a few words in anfwer to what had been afferted; viz. that the meafure was contrary to the confent of the Irish people.' Mr. Tierney had no objection to the meafure, if it could be proved that it was the choice of the Irish people. But, from the information he had received, he had not the fmallest doubt but the fenfe of the people of Ireland was against the union. But it was alleged that the fenfe of the houfe of commons of Ireland was in favour of union. Now, what was the fact? Why, the last year there were but 105 against the project of union, whereas the minority amounted this year to 120 members. Was this a proof of the policy and juftice of an union? That in the houfe of commons in Ireland, 120 was against the meafure, a number bearing the fame proportion as 233 in the British parliament. Now, would not any man fay, that if he faw fuch a minority as 223 against the right honourable gentleman, the minifter was defeated?

Lord Carysfort confidered the meafure wife, politic, and advantageous to the two countries; and obferved, that there was a great balance of the whole property of the nation in favour of it. The property of the lords who voted for the union was as ten to one more than that of thofe who voted against

it. There was not 120, but 138 members for the union in the commons, including the two tellers and the fpeaker.

The chancellor of the exchequer obferved, that it had been faid last year, when the parliament was against the union, "reject it;" and they tell us, faid he, this night, appeal to the people. He never could confent to fuch doctrine. There might be occafions, but he hoped they would ever be few, when an appeal to the people was the juft mode of proceeding on important fubjects; but the prefent was not a fit moment to appeal to the people of Ireland. Befides, the people of Ireland had concurred in it.

Mr. Grey made a fhort reply, and faid it was entertaining to hear the minifter refufe to appeal to the people, though all the world knew the minifter did at one time appeal to the people. The early idol of his ambition was now alfo abandoned.

Lord Sheffield said a few words in corroboration of the facts adduced by lord Carysfort, after which the houfe divided on Mr. Grey's motion.-Ayes 30-Noes 236.

The three first propofitions were then moved and carried without a divifion.

The house being refumed, Mr. Douglas brought up the report of the committee, and the house adjourned till the next day,

Tuefday, April 22, when the houfe having refolved itself into a committee, the chancellor of the exchequer faid, in confequence of the arrangement made the preceding night, the difcuffion of the fourth article was to be deferred till Thurfday. The article, therefore, to which he would call their attention was that which refpected finance-that ftated the contribution which Ire

land

« PreviousContinue »