Page images
PDF
EPUB
[blocks in formation]

LONDON:
PUBLISHED AT THE OFFICE OF THE LAW TIMES,

WELLINGTON STREET, STRAND, W.C. .

1872.

LAW DEPARTMENT,
LELAND STANFORD, JR., UNIVERSITY

LIBRARY OF THE

59,220

LONDON : PRINTED AND PUBLISHED BY HORACE COX, AT THE “LAW TIMES" OFFICE, WELLINGTON-STREET, STRAND.

INDEX TO NOTES OF THE WEEK.

NAMES OF CASES.

65

Abbott v. The Bakers’ and Confectioners' Toa | Calisher v. Forbes, 98

| European Central Railway Company, re The ; Association (Limited), 61, 288 Calver v. Roberts, 65

parte Sykes, 211 Accidental Death Insurance Company, re The, | Cardigan v. Curzon-Howe, 80

Evans v. Summers, 65 ex parte Chappell, 114 Carter v. Earl of Ducie, 115

Evans' Trusts, re W., 406
Accidental Death Insurance Company, The, v. Carver v. Pinto Leite, 60

Farhall v. Farhall, 60
Walford, 60
Case v. MoClellan, 83

Fell v. Whittaker, 67
Ackford v. Barelli and another, 67
| Castle and others v. Playford, 291

Fernie v. Scott, 82
Ackland's Trusts, re, 346
Caudwell (app.) v. Hanson (resp.), 44

Fleet v. Murton and another, 44
Alexander v. Campbell, 479
Caulwell, ex parte; re Currie, î15

Ford (app.) v. Boon (resp), 65
Alexander v. Van der Zee, 83
Catt v. Tourle, 63

Ford v. Forter, 230
Allen v. Gott, 344

Chabord v. The New Russian Company (Limited), Foster, In the Goods of, 67 Allen v. Miller and others, 292

228

Foulger (app.) v. Steadman (resp.), 479
Allsop v. Wheatcroft, 63
Charlton v. Charlton, 135

Frith v. The Overseers of Widdecombe-on-the.
Amherst's Will, re Lady, 211
Chatfield v. Berchtoldt, 288

Mon, 66
Anderson v. Anderson, 249
Cheshire, Re, 42

Frost v. Knight, 292
Armitage v. Armitage, 229

Chew v. Watson, 364 Arrowsmith v. Chandler, 270 | Chorlton v. Overseers of Stretford, 82

Gabb v. Gabb and Marshall, 213 Askew v. TH ewer Aut

Ulverston and

| Chorlton (app.) v. The Overseers of Tonge (resps.), Gainsborough Union (apps.) v. Welch (resp.), the Ulverston Local Board, 425

61 Aston v. Meredith, 386

City of Moscow Gas Company (Limited) The, v. Gallow v. Metropolitan Board of Works, 296 Attorney, re An, 251

The International Financial Soqiety (Limited), Gardiner v. Jewers, 250 Attorney-General v. Akers, 310

157, 289

Garnier, re, 249 Attorney-General, The, v. Barker, 232

Clarke v. Bishop, 213

| Gaunt v. Fynney, 345 Attorney-General v. Campbell and others, 477 Clive v. Clive, 327

Gauntlet, The, 308
Attorney-General v. Clements, 115
Coates and another Collins, 88

Gee v. Metropolitan Railway Company, 212
Attorney-General and Colbeck and Marriot v. The Cohen, ex parte, re Sparke, 42

Gibbs v. Grady, 99 Mayor, Aldermen, and Burgesses of Batley, 347, Coles, In the Goods of, 135

Gibson, re, 80 387 Collins, ex parte, re Davies, 136

Gilchrist v. Herbert, 290 Attorney-General v. Fletcher, 115

Commissioners of Sewers of the City of London, Gill (app.) v. Bright" (resp.), 45 Attorney-General v. Stewart, 365

The, v. Glasse, 60, 384

Glover v. Ellison, 290 Attorney-General v. The Great Eastern Railway Contract Corporation (Limited) (Gooch's case), Godrich v. Godrich, 480 Company, 211, 309, 478

60, 134, 288

Gompertz v. Kensit, 230
Atty v. Etough, 328
Cockayne v. Harrison, 365

Gough v. Smith, 385
Austin v. Austin, 68
Cook v. Guerra, 45

Gray v. Siggers 405
Cooker, re, 82

Great Northern and the Midland, The, 311
Baile v. Baile, 310
Cooper v. Kynock, 210, 365

Great Oceanic Telegraph Company (Limited), re
Baker's Trust, re, 135
Coote v. Jecks, 386

The, Harward's case, 42
Ballina Mills Company (Limited), The, v. The Corcoran v. Witt, 62

Green v. Rooke, 328
Royal Insurance Company, 232
Core (app.) v. James (resp.), 45

Greene v. The West Cheshire Railway Company, 27
Barber, re, 212
Cornish v. Clark, 478

Greening and Company (Limited), re, ex parte
Barrett's Estate, re, 61
Cowles v. Gale, 42

Marsh, 43
Bateson v. Gosling, 45
Cox v. Sillen, 27

Grey v. Seckham, 250
Beak v. Beak, 386

Cramer and Co., re ; ex parte Sangster, 63 Griffith, In the Goods of, 387
Beattie v. Lord Ebury, 347
Cronshaw v. The Wigan Burial Board, 44

Guildford Union (apps.) v. St. Olave's Union Belfast Tramways Company (Limited), re The, Crossely, ex parte ; re Taylor, 329

(resps.), 212 212, 309 Crouch v. Tregonning, 269

Gumm v. Hallett, 366
Bendle v. Watson, 65

Cruikshank v. Duffin, 310
Betts v. Cleaver, 386
Curling v. Walters, 79

Hadley v. M‘Dougall, 309
Biggs v. Foster, 289

Haigh v. Kaye, 478
Biggs v. Upton, 248
Darnell v. Hunter, 79

Hamer, Mary, In the Goods of, 233, 347
Bignold's Settlement Trust, re, 288
Davies and Wife v. Solomon, 82

Hamilton v. Hector, 346
Birkenhead Benefit Building Society, re The, 366 Dawson v. Robinson, 27

Hanson v. The Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway
Bishop v. Wise, 364
Day v. Day, 311

Company, 212
Bloomer v. Spittle, 327
Deanes v. Kitchin, 290

Hardy v. The Metropolitan Land and Finance
Bolland ex parte ; re Cherry, 60
De Lancey v. The Queen, 292

Company (Limited), 309
Boyd v. Petrie, 345
Dent v. Nickalls, 212

Harrison v. T'he Bank of Australasia, 232
Boyle, ex parte; re Collett, 59
Dewhurst, ex parte ; re Vanlohe, 134

Haselfoot's Estate, re (Chauntler's claim), 249
Bradley v. Sylvester, 44
Dixon (app.) v. Cockett (resp.), 231

Hawkes, ex parte, re Keely, 249
Breton, Baillie, In the Goods of, 459
Dixon v. Enoch, 291

Hayes v. Oatley, 478
Briscoe's Trusts, 310
Dobson v. Dobson and Barber, 233

Haymen v. Gover, 231
British Columbia, and Vancouver Island Spar, Dudley Union (apps.) v. Wolverhampton Union Head v. Tattersall and another, 66
Lumber, and saw Mill Company (Limited),

Heasman v. Pearse, 157 (Stamp's Claim), 62

Dyte v. The St. Pancras Board of Guardians, Heinrich, The, 311 Britton v. The Great Western Cotton Company, 232

Hemming v. Maddick, 26, 364 269

Hemmingway, ex parte ; re Howard, 426 Bruff v. Cobbold, 248

East of England Bank, re The; ex parte Tillett, Hemsworth v. Mann, 405 Brutton, re, 212

309

Hercules Insurance Company (Limited), re The, Brutton v. The Parish of St. George, Hanover Easton (app.) v. Richmond Highway Board (resps.) Pugh's case; Sharman's case, 346 square, 43

64

Hewitt v. Jardine, 479
Broadwood's Settled Estates, re, 385
Earl of Elgin, The, and the Jesmond, 41

Hext v. Gill, 386
Brown, ex parte ; re Scrivener, 294
Edmonds, ex parte, 81

Heyman, ex parte ; re Heyman, 385
Buchanan, In the Goods of, 310
Ellis v. Barker, 98

Hicks v. Ross, 386
Buckhurst (app.) v. The Guardians of Chatham | Else v. Else, 210

Higgs v. Dorkis, 212 (resps.), 231 Emerson, ex parte; re Hawkins, 46

Hill v. Cock; Poltimore, Lord, v. Cock, 231 Buckley (app.) v. Weigley (resp.). 66 Empress, The, 233

Hinde v. Sheppard and others, 28 Burley o. Saint, 289

English Assurance Company, re, The (Holdich's Hobson v. Nicholson, 310 Burr v. Miller, 317

case), 458

Holmes v. Albright, 81
Burrell v. Maxwell, 135
European Assurance Society, re The, 479

Holmes v. Symons, 63
Burrows v. The March Gas and Coke Company European Assurance Society, re The ; ex pa te Honey, er parte ; re Jeffery, 114
(Limited), 291
Greenough ; ex parte Holt, 61

Huckle v. Piper, 82
Busby v. The Corporation of Leeds, 289
European Bank (Limited), re The, 228

Hudson v. Walker, 253
Buxton v. Rust, 45

| European Bank (Limited), re, (Masters's case), 61, Hunter v. Bullock, 346 Byrne v. Guano Consignment Company, 251 345

Hunter v. Walters, 79

re

« PreviousContinue »