Page images
PDF
EPUB

Wraxall writes, after hearing Mr. Pitt's first speech:

Even his friends could not always induce | wrote to Lord Auckland that there were him to listen to reason and remonstrance," insurmountable objections" to marriage though they sometimes held him down in his on his part. A curious correspondence seat by the skirts of his coat, in order to pre- ensued. But Pitt still kept to the word vent the ebullition of his violence or indigna-insurmountable." What this meant notion. Gentle, mild, and amenable to argument in private society, of which he formed body can explain. It is singular that Pitt the delight and the ornament, he was often made the solemn speaker of the House intemperate and reprehensibly personal in of Commons his confidant in this affair, Parliament. Fox, however irritated, never surely as improper a person to impart a forgot that he was a chief; Burke, in his most love-tale to as Cato. sublime flights, was only a partisan. The countenance of the latter, full of intellect, but destitute of softness, and which rarely relaxed into a smile, did not invite approach or conciliation. His enmities and prejudices, though they originated in principle as well as in conviction, yet became tinged with the virulent spirit of party; and were eventually in many instances inveterate, unjust, and insurmountable. Infinitely more respectable than Fox, he was nevertheless far less amiable. Exempt from his defects and irregularities, Burke wanted the suavity of Fox's manner, his amenity, and his placability. The one procured more admirers, the other possessed more friends.

We now turn to Wraxall's portrayal of the character of Pitt, the greatest orator that ever enchanted the House of Commons. Lord Campbell relates that when he was reporting Pitt's speech on the Peace of Amiens, Pitt made quotation from his favorite Virgil, and delivered it with such wonderful pathos that Lord Campbell could not hold his pen to write down what he said. It must have been something extraordinary to shake the iron nerves of plain John Campbell.

Pitt was the greatest peace minister England ever possessed, with the exception perhaps of Sir Robert Walpole. Walpole at last was forced into the Span ish war by the clamor of the people, just as Pitt was thrust into the war with France. Pitt had not only been successful at home, but he had deprived France of her ascendancy in Holland, and de feated Spain in her attack on Nootka Sound, and these victories were gained by diplomatic means. He was not so successful in his attempt to make the empress Catherine restore Oczacow to the Turks. The empress stood to her guns, saying, "Dogs who bark, very seldom bite," and gained her end.

All then beheld in him at once a future Minister, and the Opposition, overjoyed at such an accession of strength, vied with each other in their encomiums, as well as in their predictions of his certain elevation. Burke exclaimed that, "he was not merely a chip of the old block, but the old block itself." Nor did Fox do less justice to the talents of this new competitor for power, popularity, and employment. Having carried him to Brookes's Club, a few days afterwards, Pitt was elected a member of that society; which then com. prehended almost all the men of rank and great talents throughout the kingdom, who were engaged in Parliamentary opposition to Ministers. It is a fact, that Pitt remained during several years a member of Brookes's ;" but he rarely if ever appeared there after he came into office. So nice was his tact, so deep his penetration, and in so different a mould was he cast from Fox, that even on his first reception in St. James's Street, though it was of the most flattering description, he was not dazzled nor won by it. Fox himself soon whom play had no attractions, and who beheld perceived the coldness of his new ally, for

a faro table without emotion; though neither
he nor Burke were probably aware of the pro-
found and regulated, but soaring ambition,
which animated him to aspire, without passing
through any intermediate stage, to occupy the
first employments of the State.

ambition. At the death of Lord Rock-
Pitt speedily gained the object of his
ingham the secession of Fox and his
friends left Lord Shelburne, the prime
minister appointed by the king, in a sit-
uation of great difficulty. The "school-
boy"
"Pitt was appointed chancellor of the
exchequer and leader of the House of
Commons. This took place in July, 1782.
When Parliament met in the winter, the
celebrated coalition was formed to drive
Lord Shelburne out of office. On the
first night of the great debate, when the
ministry was defeated by a majority of
sixteen, Pitt's speech was considered a
failure even by Mr. Pretyman, his former
tutor. But on the second night, when

Pitt, it is said, was wedded to his coun: try. Wraxall relates that it was reported he admired a daughter of Lord Auckland, but that he abandoned his intention of marriage. This is the fact. Miss Eleanor Eden was very beautiful, as those who have seen her portrait can testify. Pitt paid her great attention, but suddenly death.

Pitt was a member of Brookes's at the time of his

Lord John Cavendish moved a censure on
the government with respect to the terms
of peace, Pitt spoke, to use an expression
of Lord Townshend's on another occa-
sion, "like an angel." He retaliated on
Fox with the bitterest scorn.

Pitt spoke as follows:
:-

The triumphs of party, with which this selfappointed Minister seems so highly elate, shall never seduce me to any inconsistency which the busiest suspicion shall presume to glance at. I will never engage in political enmities without public cause. I will never forego such enmities without the public approbation; nor will be questioned and cast off in the face of this House by one virtuous and dissatisfied friend. If [he added] this baneful alliance is not already formed; if this ill-omened marriage is not already solemnized, I know a just and lawful impediment, and in the name of the public safety, I here forbid the banns. Wraxall writes:

[ocr errors]
[blocks in formation]

The following is a spirited translation by Sir Theodore Martin of this inspired quotation:

"Fortune, who with malicious glee

Her merciless vocation plies,
Benignly smiling now on me,

Now on another, bids him rise,
And in mere wantonness of whim
Her favors shifts from me to him.
I laud her, whilst by me she holds;
But if she spread her pinions swift
I wrap me in my virtue's folds,
And yielding back her every gift
Take refuge in the life so free
Of bare but honest poverty."

of oratorical acting is not to be found in antiquity. Even if we suppose the whole passage to have been studied and prepared, yet the delicacy of the omission is not less admirable.

To raise the

The ministry were defeated again and resigned. Mr. Pitt was offered the predismissal of the coalition from office, Mr. miership, but he wisely refused. On the Pitt was appointed prime minister. How he fought the good fight against overwhelming odds, dissolved Parliament, and scattered his opponents to the winds, is well known to our readers. He continued for years the most popular of ministers, until the calamities of the war with France raised great discontent against him. We believe Pitt disliked war. finances of England to their former prosperity, to cultivate the arts of peace, was the object of his life. We cannot but think that he was forced into the war with France by the united voice of the king and the people. Alas! all wars are popu lar at first. When he resigned office in 1801, it was partly that Addington might make peace which he could not. On his resuming office, everything went wrong on the Continent. The coalition which he had formed against France ended in failure, and the battle of Austerlitz undoubtedly broke his mighty heart.

Wilberforce says Pitt was the wittiest man he ever knew, yet how few of his sayings are recorded! Once when arriv ing late at dinner, he apologized for the lateness of his arrival on the ground that he had to wait to hear Addington finish his speech, and "you know," he said, "that the doctor always travels with his own horses." On another occasion he went to visit his friend Plumer Ward at his villa near Moulsey; Pitt found fault with the dreariness of the situation, and asked him how he could live there. "It is a mere question of money," said Plumer Ward. Well!" said Pitt, "and how much do they give you?”

Of his stately bearing the following anecdote is told.

Michael Angelo Taylor, walking with a friend, declared his intention of cutting Pitt. Just then Pitt came sailing down St. James's Street, nodded to Angelo Taylor's friend, but took no notice of little Michael. "There," said Michael Angelo, "you see I've cut him!" "I'm very glad you told me your intention," said his friend, 'else Í should have thought he cut you."

[ocr errors]

Wraxall writes of Sheridan:

[ocr errors]

He possessed a ductility and versatility of

talents, which no public man in our time has equalled; and these intellectual endowments were sustained by a suavity of temper that seemed to set at defiance all attempts to ruffle or discompose it. Playing with his irritable or angry antagonist, Sheridan exposed him by sallies of wit, or attacked him with classic ele gance of satire; performing this arduous task in the face of a crowded assembly, without losing for an instant either his presence of mind, his facility of expression, or his good humor. He wounded deepest, indeed, when he smiled; and convulsed his hearers with laughter while the object of his ridicule or animadversion was twisting under the lash.

Sheridan had various difficulties to struggle with, he was without distinguished birth, connections, or fortune, and it was by his unaided talent alone that he vanquished such obstacles.

shall be blessed or cursed with a large extension of suffrage, the "oftener if needs be" party will be masters of the

situation.

It is related by Lord Holland that there never was so amusing a scene in the House of Commons as the dispute between Sheridan and Dundas respecting the meaning of the word malheureux. Dundas and Sheridan were totally igno rant of the French language. Lord Auckland had presented a demand to the States-General of Holland, that ces malheureux, the regicides, should be given up to the sword of the law. Sheridan moved a vote of censure on Lord Auckland. Dundas defended Lord Auckland on the ground that " mollyroo" only meant an "unfortunate gentleman"! Erskine At this period of his life, when he was not when he went with a friend to France at also had no knowledge of French, and, more than thirty-three years of age, his coun tenance and features had in them something the peace of Amiens, he sent out letters peculiarly pleasing; indicative at once of in- of invitation for a dinner, nobody came. tellect, humor, and gaiety. All these charac-"This is your confounded French, Ersteristics played about his lips when speaking, and operated with inconceivable attraction; for they anticipated, as it were, to the eye the effect produced by his oratory on the ear; thus opening for him a sure way to the heart, or the understanding. Even the tones of his voice, which were singularly mellifluous, aided the general effect of his eloquence; nor was it accompanied by Burke's unpleasant Irish accent. Pitt's enunciation was unquestionably more imposing, dignified and sonorous. Fox displayed more argument, as well as vehemence; Burke possessed more fancy and enthusiasm; but Sheridan won his way by a sort of fascination. At thirty-three, it might be said of his aspect, as Milton does of the fallen angel's form,

kine," said his companion. "Not a bit of it," said Erskine. "Isn't Vendredi Wednesday?"

Pitt seems to have disliked and dreaded Sheridan more than any other of his op ponents. His sneers at him about his theatrical occupations had been answered by Sheridan with a crushing reply, comparing Pitt to the Angry Boy in Ben Jonson's "Alchymist." When Sheridan nobly came forward during the mutiny at the Nore to support the government, Pitt showed not the slightest signs of grati tude. Sheridan's career unfortunately closed in the darkest fashion. Drink and dissipation deprived him of his means of livelihood, and hurried him to his tomb.

His face had not yet lost All her original brightness. The witty sayings attributed to SheriThis extraordinary man [writes Wraxall] as dan are innumerable. Perhaps one of the he approached the confines of old age, sunk most amusing was, when rolling drunk in with each successive year in general estimathe gutter, his calling out to a passer-by, perfect, as I believe they did, they neverthe tion. Admitting that his faculties remained "Take me to Kensington; I am Mr. Wil-less became overcast from the effects of inberforce!" But there are two anecdotes toxication, licentiousness and habits of dissitold of him which are very suggestive at pation. How different, we must own, was the the present time. Sheridan, surveying a tenor of Fox's life after the period of his remeeting like one of those that now some- treat to St. Anne's Hill! Divided during times assemble in Trafalgar Square, said: many months of the year between rustic occu"I wonder what it is that these good peo-pations, elegant literature, and the company ple want. It can't be liberty; that they seem to have plenty of. I think it must be property; that they seem rather in want of." When asked what his principles were at an election, he invariably responded, "I am for universal suffrage, annual parliaments and oftener if needs time, disliked Sheridan, whom he tried You can't beat," said Sheridan, "an oftener if needs be man." When we

be." 64

of a few friends, Fox (a green apron frequently himself in pruning or nailing up his own fruitfastened round his waist) amused and employed trees. But Fox outlived his vices; those of Sheridan accompanied him to the tomb.

George Selwyn, the great wit of the

These wretches.

to prevent being elected a member of Brookes's; but his chief witticisms were directed against Fox. When asked whether he had been to Tyburn to witness the execution of one Charles Fox," "No," he answered, “I make a point of never attending rehearsals." He called Fox and Pitt the "idle and industrious apprentices." George Selwyn once had a dispute with Lord Weymouth, who maintained that "centrical" was the right word and not "central." Somebody came and told Selwyn that Fox had decided against him. Then, said Selwyn, “Carry him my compliments with the following authority from the Rape of the Lock:' Umbriel, a dusky, melancholy sprite, As ever sullied the fair face of light, Down to the central earth, his proper scene, Repaired to search the gloomy cave of Spleen!"

When Pitt was assaulted in St. James's Street on his return from a banquet in the city, Fox was said to have been rec: ognized amongst the rioters. Fox denied this, and said he had passed the night with Mrs. Armstead, who was ready to swear to it. Selwyn thought this defence most suspicious, as criminals at the Old Bailey always pleaded an alibi, and brought up their concubines in support. When the prince had married Mrs. Fitz. herbert and made Fox go down to the House of Commons to deny that such an occurrence had taken place, George Selwyn said he supposed the prince's instructions were conveyed in the language of Othello:

Villain, be sure you prove my love a w— e. Again when a subscription was raised for Fox, somebody said it was a delicate subject, and wondered how Fox would take

it.

“Why, quarterly, to be sure," said Selwyn. George Selwyn once went to confession at a Roman Catholic church, and revealed such revolting enormities that the horrified priest bolted out of his box into the street. Selwyn left the levée just as an ambitious gentleman from the country was about to be knighted. The king expressed his astonishment that he had not stayed to witness the ceremony, as it was so like an execution. George heard of the joke, writes a friend, but did not like it; he is on that subject still very

sore."

66

Lord Thurlow had been a prime mover in the overthrow of the coalition, when

Charles Fox had inherited the swarthy complexion

of his ancestor Charles II.

the "janissaries of the bedchamber," in conjunction with Scotch lords and bishops, were called upon to vote against the king's own ministers. Still he hated Pitt and thwarted him whenever he saw his oppor tunity. Like the Turk, Lord Thurlow could not bear a brother near the throne. Once a friend, wishing to give a religious turn to his mind, read to him "Paradise Lost," when travelling with him on a Sunday. When the friend came to Lucifer's speech,

Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven, Lord Thurlow exclaimed, "Dd fine fellow! I hope he'll win!" When a deputation of Dissenters waited upon him to ask for his support of their claims, Lord Thurlow said, "No, I support everything established, but if you get your d-d religion established, I will support that Council but in the House of Lords. On too." He not only opposed Pitt in the slave-trade, Lord Stanhope kept running one occasion during the debate on the to and fro, to get the orders of Pitt, who was standing under the throne. Lord Stanhope uttered some domineering expression; Lord Thurlow said that it reminded him of a passage in a pamphlet which stated that where the planter su perintended his negroes all went well, but when they were turned over to the ble lord once began his speech with, deputy slave-driver all went ill. A no"My lords, I ask myself this question." "Yes," muttered Thurlow, "and a d―d foolish answer you'll get." He had a violent quarrel with Mr. Pitt respecting the appointment of Pepper Arden, afterwards the first Lord Alvanley, to the mastership of the rolls. Pepper Arden was of a more Christian mind than Lord Thurlow, but quite as irascible. Once at family prayers, a servant had remained in his room and began a musical performance. Pepper started up and roared out, "Will nobody stop that fellow's d-d fiddling!"

In the autumn of 1788 the king went to Cheltenham on account of his health. He displayed some eccentricity of manner when staying there, as well as at Glouces ter, where he went on a visit to Bishop Hurd. At Cheltenham he asked Lady with her lover Mr. Latouche, whom she Charlotte Leeson how she was getting on afterwards married. The king received a severe rebuff. Pray," said Lady Charlotte, "what is that to you?" This and Other peculiarities of the king were much remarked upon, but nobody had the slight

66

est idea of the catastrophe which was approaching. The king returned to Windsor, and it was soon impossible to conceal from the nation that his mind had given way.

Parliament was called together, and a scene of party violence ensued unexam. pled in the history of England. Fox, advised by Lord Loughborough, proclaimed the right of the Prince of Wales to the regency during the eclipse of the king's mental life. Pitt in reply, denied the right, and went so far as to say that "the prince possessed no more right to assume the government than any other subject of

the nation.

I have heard [said Lord Loughborough] of a most extraordinary assertion, boldly, arrogantly and presumptuously advanced elsewhere. It is, that "the heir-apparent to the throne, though of full age, has no more right to assume the government, while His Majesty's malady incapacitates him from reigning, than any other individual subject." If this doctrine is founded in law, the regency must be elective, not hereditary. Does not the law describe the Prince of Wales the same with the King? Is it not as much high treason to compass the death of the former as the latter, and does that penalty attach to compassing the death of any other subject?

Lord Loughborough was a great orator. He had led for the Hamiltons in the

great Douglas case, and Fox thought his speech in the House of Lords on that subject the finest he ever heard. He was an admirable letter writer, and by many was thought to be Junius. He was

a daring pilot in extremity, Pleased with the danger when the waves ran high.

In the regency dispute he was unsuccessful, more on account of his client than his doctrine. The mass of the English people were not disposed to abandon the rule of the king for that of his profligate son; and they rallied round the throne and the great peace minister, "Billy Pitt," as they fondly called him, with wonderful unanimity.

The Prince of Wales, when freed from paternal rule, instantly fell into the society of panders and sycophants. Lord Malden, Viscount Leporello,” as Thackeray calls him, furthered the prince's intrigue with Perdita. The prince's mar riage with Mrs. Fitzherbert and his denial of it caused great scandal; but it was his court at Brighton which most shocked the public mind. Mr. Storer, George Selwyn's friend, describes the scene. He

found the town filled with the gayest and prettiest women in England of a certain class. Lord Brudenell, noted for his austerity of deportment, had evidently changed his character. Mr. Storer writes:

the climax of immorality, from the lowest to the first ranged round the boxes. But nothing was so singular here as to see our friend Lord Brudenell in so new a point of view. He was living with all these fair nymphs, in the easiest manner. How far his virtue was in danger I will not pretend to say, but if Cato could not trust himself at Baiæ, I should say his Lordship runs some risk at Brighthelmstone. He is now no longer called His Honor, but the familiar appellation of "Cockie" is substituted in its stead. It is said a great personage is prodigiously amused with this cognomen, which the keeper of his privy purse has acquired.

It was curious to observe at the play-house

"The prince is still at Brighton," writes the Duke of Dorset, "and is driving the whole world away." If the prince lived in these virtuous times, the world would probably run after rather than away from him. Mr. Hatsell lifts up his hands with holy horror when he hears that the prince is driving about with Jack Day and Travis the Jew. Jews are seldom mentioned in the old memoirs without being sneered at. Fox called the anteroom where he met his creditors "Jerusalem Chamber." When one of the Foleys escaped to Boulogne, George Selwyn said, "This is a Jews." Lord Alvanley, when asked to Passover that will not be relished by the go to a masquerade as Isaac of York," apologized for his refusal on the ground that he never could do a Jew. What an amusing but rather insolent letter there is given in the "Life of Lord Macaulay," describing a Goldsmid ball! Mr. Charles Greville at the same period seems to be rather astonished to meet old Rothschild and his dandy son at the Austrian ambassador's. Now all is happily changed, and the people of Israel are the chief ornaments of London society.

66

The prince, with his Roman Catholic wife, his mistresses, his jockeys, his prizefighters, his practical jokers, and his Jew, was profoundly distrusted even by his friends. His first care was to gain the support of the Duke of York, the favorite son of the king. This was easily accomplished.

Wraxall writes:

A promise of being placed at the head of • The prince.

« PreviousContinue »