and of the melancholy life of the fad hiftorian of this rural defolation.' • Sweet was the found when oft at evening's close, That feebly bends befide the plashy spring; Near yonder copfe, where once the garden fimil'd, Nor ere had changed, nor wifh'd to change his place; Wept o'er his wounds, or tales of forrow done, • Thus to relieve the wretched was his pride, He watched and wept, he prayed and felt, for all. Befide the bed where parting life was layed, • At church, with meek and unaffected grace, And plucked his gown to fhare the good man's fmile. Their welfare pleased him, and their cares diftreft; Swells from the vale, and midway leaves the ftorm, We rarely fee a poem in which there are fewer inftances of improper fentiment, or expreffion, than in this. Two lines, however, we must beg leave to animadvert upon. The fad hiftorian of the penfive plain.' Penfive is too bold an epithet, even in poetry; as it attributes too much of foul to inanimate matter.-Dryden, indeed, is guilty of a like impropriety in his noble imitation of the beginning of the first book of Lucretius: addreffing himself to Venus, he fays, of Mars, Ff4 'Who Who oft retires from fighting fields, to prove The pleafing pains of thy eternal love." Dryden here afcribes too much action to the Fields, as Dr. Goldsmith has infpired his Plain with too reflecting a melancholy. Dryden has attributed to his Fields too strong a characteristic of the impetuous warriour; and Dr. Goldsmith has given to his Plain too much of the fenfibility and contemplation of the poet we should emulate the natural and great fublime of Dryden, but we fhould avoid his negligence and excess. His pity gave ere charity began.' This line violates the perfpicuity of poetry. And the thought it contains is but a quaint one; more worthy of Seneca, or of the worst poetry of Dr. Young, than of the author of the Deferted Village. In giving the following lines to the fentimental reader, we need not defire him principally to mark the unhappy fituation of the ruined country-girl: a home reproof to obdurate men ; and a strong warning to unguarded innocence. Where then, ah, where fhall poverty refide, If to the city fped-What waits him there? Here, while the courtier glitters in brocade, Here, while the proud their long drawn pomps display, Sure these denote one univerfal joy! Are these thy ferious thoughts-Ah, turn thine eyes She once, perhaps, in village plenty bleft, Her Her modest looks the cottage might adorn, And pinch'd with cold, and fhrinking from the shower, She left her wheel and robes of country brown.' The close of the poem is beautiful, but mere imagination and romance. In his enthufiaftic vifion, Commerce and Luxury drive the rural virtues from the land. Unfortunate Poetry too is tranfported; and the author takes a most pathetic leave of her. And thou sweet Poetry, thou lovelieft maid, Thou fource of all my blifs, and all my woe, poetry as the Poetry is of if she was ba the the poet requests her to embellish in her exile, for the good of mankind. We differ fo far from Dr. Goldsmith's theory, that we think the country diftinguished from all others for its extenfive commerce, its refined luxury, and its generous plan of freedom, the most favourable region to the muses. There the poet will find the amplest field for his imagination; the best judges, and the highest rewards of his merit. London, therefore, is the place to which a fon of Apollo fhould direct his views; and by no means to the cliffs of Torno, or to the fide of Pambamarca. In London, he will have the richest fund of thought, and the warmest incentives to write: and without thefe advantages in perfection, a great genius can never be perfectly displayed.--Here, it must be confeffed, a poet often treads on dangerous ground; and the greater his talents are, his ruin is the more probable; for his fenfibilty is the more quick, and his virtuous condu&t the more difficult. But if his abuse of external objects will lead him to deftruation, his proper application of them will procure him, at least, a competent fubfiftence, and high reputation., Why do we excel the ancients in writing, (for that we do excel them, blind prejudice only and ftupidity will deny) because the improvement of literature hath kept pace with all other improvements; because a justnefs, a delicacy of thinking, the true fublime, are the confequences of polished life; because genius is now furnished with the greatest variety of ideas, and ftimulated by the most powerful incitements to excel. Do the ancients excel us in poeetry Certainly not, upon the whole. It is true, they preceded us; and therefore have tranfmitted many noble fentiments, which we can only repeat. They are likewife more fortunate than we are in another circumftance; they gave the fire of genius its immediate and full play; but we are apt to refrain and fubdue it too much by art. They are often too negligent; we are fometimes too elaborate. But none of them are fo fublime as our divine Shakespeare and Milton; in none of them is to be found fo much vigour and correctness united as in Pope. Are the ancient hiftorians preferable to our beft hiftorians as writers? By no means. They dwell upon trifies; they tell us a ftring of barbarous tales, which now would only be pardonable from the mouth of an old woman in a chimney-corner. Indeed they exhibit giants of virtue and patriotism to our view, of whom we have no living fimilitudes. Let us discriminate before we pronounce; and not mistake old characters, which we owe to the government, and manners of their country, for the excellence of old authors. The reader, we hope, will not be difpleafed with this digreffion, which is not much out of the way, when we are animadverting |