Democracy and Equality: The Enduring Constitutional Vision of the Warren CourtFrom 1953 to 1969, the Supreme Court under Chief Justice Earl Warren brought about many of the proudest achievements of American constitutional law. The Warren declared racial segregation and laws forbidding interracial marriage to be unconstitutional; it expanded the right of citizens to criticize public officials; it held school prayer unconstitutional; and it ruled that people accused of a crime must be given a lawyer even if they can't afford one. Yet, despite those and other achievements, conservative critics have fiercely accused the justices of the Warren Court of abusing their authority by supposedly imposing their own opinions on the nation. As the eminent legal scholars Geoffrey R. Stone and David A. Strauss demonstrate in Democracy and Equality, the Warren Court's approach to the Constitution was consistent with the most basic values of our Constitution and with the most fundamental responsibilities of our judiciary. Stone and Strauss describe the Warren Court's extraordinary achievements by reviewing its jurisprudence across a range of issues addressing our nation's commitment to the values of democracy and equality. In each chapter, they tell the story of a critical decision, exploring the historical and legal context of each case, the Court's reasoning, and how the justices of the Warren Court fulfilled the Court's most important responsibilities. This powerfully argued evaluation of the Warren Court's legacy, in commemoration of the 50th anniversary of the end of the Warren Court, both celebrates and defends the Warren Court's achievements against almost sixty-five years of unrelenting and unwarranted attacks by conservatives. It demonstrates not only why the Warren Court's approach to constitutional interpretation was correct and admirable, but also why the approach of the Warren Court was far superior to that of the increasingly conservative justices who have dominated the Supreme Court over the past half-century. |
Contents
| 1 | |
1 Brown v Board of Education 1954 | 13 |
2 Mapp v Ohio 1961 | 27 |
3 Engel v Vitale 1962 | 40 |
4 Gideon v Wainwright 1963 | 52 |
5 New York Times v Sullivan 1964 | 63 |
6 Reynolds v Sims 1964 | 76 |
7 Griswold v Connecticut 1965 | 89 |
8 Miranda v Arizona 1966 | 101 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action adopted African American Alabama American apply appointed approach Black Board Brennan Brown Burger century Chief Justice civil Clause concluded conservative Constitution constitutionally contraception convicted counsel course Court decisions Court held criminal critics decided decision defendant dissenting district Douglas effect elected Equal Protection established evidence example explained fact federal Fourteenth Amendment Fourth Amendment freedom fundamental Gideon guarantees Harlan Ibid important individual interest involved issue joined judges judicial Justice Katz later lawyer limited Loving majority Marshall meaning Michigan Miranda obtained officials opinion originalism person police political practice prayer Press principle problem Professor public schools question quoting race racial reasonable religious remains residency result Review Reynolds Roberts role rule segregation separate speech statements statute Sullivan supra note Supreme Court suspect tion trial unconstitutional United University violated Virginia vote Warren Court York