And thereupon an Affidavit of Robert Young, Writer Ordered, That the Petitioner be at Liberty to with. Appeal in Edinburgh, of the due Service of the said Order, draw the laid Appeal, as desired.

withdrawn. being read

ORDERED, That the said Respondents do put in their A Petition of James Stewart, Appellant in a Cause Stewart Answer to the said Appca!, peremptorily, in a Week. depending in this House, to which Francis Farquharson againit Far

and James Ferguson, Esquires, are Respondents ; fetting Terguson. Henderson & The House being informed, “ That Sir John Malcolm forth, “ That no Answer has been put in to this Appeal; Brownagainst « of Balbedie, Baronet, Respondent to the Appeal of “ and the Petitioner being desirous to withdraw the Sir J. Mal. colm,

George Henderson and Patrick Brown Esquire, had not same, humbly prays, Their Lordships will be pleased

put in his answer to the faid Appeal, though duly “ to order, that Leave be given to withdraw the said
« served with the Order of this House for that Pur “ Appeal :"
pose;"

It is ORDERED, That the Petitioner be at Librty to Appeal
And thereupon an Affidavit of John Orr, Writer in withdraw the faid Appeal, as desired.

withdrawn.
Edinburgh, of the due Service of the faid "Order being
read :

Upon reading the Petition of David Souter, Appellant D. Souter
ORDERED, That the said. Respondent do put in his in a "Cause depending in this House, to which Francis against Fara
Answer to the faid Appeal, peremptorily, in a Week.
Farquharson and James Ferguson, Esquires, are Re- quharson and

Ferguson ;
Wight againīt
A Petition of Archibald Wight, Appellant in a Cause pondents ; fetting forth, “ That

no Answer has been put

“ in to this Appeal; and the Petitioner being desirous to Hotchkis & depending in this House, to which Messieurs Hotchkis Johnston:

“ withdraw the same, humbly prays, That their Lordand Johnston are Respondents, which stands appointed

ships will be pleased to order, that Leave be given to for hearing, was presented and read ; setting forth, “ withdraw the said Appeal :” “ Thát the Appellant is desirous, and the Respondents “ consent, that this Appeal may be withdrawn; and It is Ordered, That the Petitioner be at Liberty to Appeal

withdrawn. " therefore praying their Lordships, That he may have withdraw the said Appeal, as desired. “ Leave to withdraw his faid Appeal.” And thereupon the Agents on both sides were called

Upon reading the Petition of John Harden Appellant Harden in, and heard at the Bar:

in a Cause depending in this House, to which Francis against FarFarquharson and James Ferguson, Esquires, are Rel- quharson and

Ferguson : And being withdrawn;

pondents; setting forth, “ That no Answer has been Appeal ORDERED, That the Petitioner be at Liberty to with

“ put in to this Appeal; and the Petitioner being desirous withdrawn. draw his faid Appeal, as desired.

" to withdraw the same, humbly prays, That their

“ Lordships will be pleased to order, that Leave be Strang against A Petition of James Strang, Appellant in a Cause

given to withdraw the said Appeal :" Strang and

depending in this House, to which David Strang and another :

It is ORDERED, That the Petitioner be at Liberty to Appeal another are Respondents, was presented and read; withdraw the said Appeal, as desired.

withdrawn. setting forth, “ That the Subject Matter of this Appeal, “ which has been set down for hearing ex parte, having “ been fetiled, the Appellant is desirous that he may lant in a Caufe depending in this House, to which againt Far

Upon reading the Petition of Stewart Souter, Appel. S. Souter « have Leave to withdraw the fame; and therefore Francis Farquharson and James Ferguson, Esquires, are “ praying their Lordships, That he may have Leave to

Ferguson : “ withdraw his faid Appeal

, the Respondents having put Respondents ; setting forth, “ That no Answer has been « in no Answer thereto."

“ put in to this Appeal ; and the Petitioner being

“ defirous to withdraw the fame, humbly prays, That
And thereupon the Agent for the Appellant was called “ their Lordships will be pleased to order, that Leave
in, and heard at the Bar :

“ be given to withdraw the said Appeal :"
And being withdrawn;
Appeal
ORDERED, That the Petitioner be at Liberty to withe withdraw the said Appeal, as desired.

It is ORDERED, That the Petitioner be at Liberty to Appeal

withdrawn, withdrawn. draw his said Appeal as desired. 7th and 8th The House being informed, “ That Colonel Drink.

A Petition of Francis Charteris, now Earl of 1 cmyss, D. QueensReports of

water, One of the Commissioners of Military Enquiry, Refpondent in a Cause depending in this House, to berry against Commillion.

E. Wemyss. “ attended ;"

which William Duke of Queensberry is Appellant, was ers of Military Enquiry delivered. He was called in, and delivered at the Bar, pursuant presented and read; setting forth, That in the last

“ Session of Parliament the Appellant brought liis to the Directions of an Act of Parliament ;

Appeal before their Lordihips, against certain Inter“ The Seventh Report of the Commissioners of

6 locutors of the Court of Session in Scotland, calling, Military Enquiry."

as Respondents thereto, Francis Charteris late Earl of

Wemyss deceased, and the Petitioner his Grandfon,
And also, “ The Eighth Report of the Commissioners

" then the Honourable Francis Charteris; that this
“ of Military Enquiry.”

Appeal was answered, and set down on the List for
And then he withdrew.

“ Hearing by both the Respondents; but Francis Charteris
And the Titles thereof, being read by the Clerk ;

“ late Earl of Wemyss, having since departed this

“ Life, as to him the Appeal is abated; that the Ordered, That the faid Reports do lie on the Table,

“ Petitioner, who has since succeeded his Grandfather ORDERED, That the said Reports be printed.

“ in his Titles and Estates, is now the fole surviving

“ Respondent in this Appeal, and being vested with Hamilton A Petition of IVilliam Hamilton, Appellant in a Cause

« all the Rights in relation thereto, which were comagainst Bore depending in this House, to which Janet Boreland and petent to his said late Grandfather ; the Petitioner laud et Ux: Husband are Respondents, was presented and read ;

" therefore prays, That the Appeal may stand revived
setting forth, “ That no Answer has been put in to this

against hiin as fole Respondent thereto, the Agent for
Appeal ; and the Petitioner being desirous to with “ the Appellant having signed the said Petition, as con-
“ draw the same, humbly prays, That their Lordships senting thereto:”
“ will be pleased that Leave be given to withdraw the
“ faid Appeal.”

And thereupon the Agents on both sides were called

in ; and being withdrawn,
And thereupon the Agent for the Appellant was
called in, and heard at the Bar:

ORDERED, That the faid Appeal do fand revived

against the Petitioner, as fole Rcfpondent thereto, as And being withdrawn;

desired. Vol. XLVII.

Upon

с

Ld. Advocate Upon reading the Petition and Appeal of His Majesty's upon the said Respondent, or upon any one of his Pro-
fir Scotland Advocate for Scotland, on Behalf of His Majesty, com curators or Agents in the Court of Seslion in Scotland,
kenzie et Ux. plaining of an Interlocutor of the Lords of Session in shall be deemed good Service.

Scotland of the 23d of May 1797 ; and TwoʻInterlocu-
tors of the said Lords of the 13th of June 1797, another The House being moved, “ That John Richardson of Richardson
Interlocutor of the said Lords of the 26th of January Fludyer Street, Westminster, Gentleman, may be per- to enter into
1803, and also of Three Interlocutors of the Lord Or. “ mitted to enter into a Recognizance for Mrs. Mary zance on it.
dinary there of the 6th of July 1803, the 12th of May “ Belch and Foseph Lindsay, on account of their Appeal
1804. and the 12th of June 1805 ; also of Five In depending in this House, they living in Scotland :"
terlocutors of the Lords of Session in Scotland of the
20th of November and 15th of December 1806, the zoth enter into a Recognizance for the said Appellants, as

It is Ordered, That the said John Richardson may
of June 1807, the 23d of February, and the 19th of May desired.
1808 ; and praying, “ That the same may be reversed,
“ varied, or altered, in so far as the same are prejudicial

Upon reading the Petition and Appeal of the Honour. Erskine et al.
to the Rights and Interests of His Majesty, or that the
“ Appellant may have such other Relief in the Premises, able Henry Erskine, Sir William Miller Baronet, and againft Blane.

Thomas Kennedy, David Cathcart, and John Hunter
as to this House, in their Lordships great Wisdom,
“ fhall seem meet; and that the Honourable Mrs. Esquire, Trustees appointed by David late Earl of Caflillis
“ Maria Hay Mackenzie of Cromarty

, and Edward Hay deceased, and of Archibald now Earl of Caffillis ; com-
« Mackenzie Esquire, of Newhall, her Husband, for his plaining of an Interlocutor of the Lords of Session in

Scotland of the Toth of February 1807, in as far as was « Interest, may be required to answer the said Appeal :'

complained of in the said Appeal ; and also of another It is Ordered, That the said Mrs. Maria Hay Mac- Interlocutor of the said Lords of Session of the 24th of kenzie, and Edward Hay Mackenzie her Husband, may November 1807, so far as it refuses the Desire of the have a Copy of the said Appeal, and do put in their reclaiming Petition, put in for the said Archibald Earl of Answer or respective Answers thereunto, in Writing, on Cafilis; and praying, “ That the same may be reversed, or before Friday the 17th Day of February next; and “ varied, or amended, or that the Appellants may have Service of this Order upon the said Respondents, or upon

o such other Relief in the Premises, as to this House, in any of their Counsel or Agents in the Court of Session “ their Lordships great Wisdom, shall seem meet ; and in Scotland, shall be deemed good Service.

“ that Andrew Blane Writer to the Signet, Trustee for

“ Sir Andrew Cathcart Baronet, may be required to anHone against Upon reading the Petition and Appeal of Nathaniel

“ swer the said Appeal :”
Davis et al:
Hone of the City of Dublin, Esquire, in that Part of the

It is ORDERED, That the faid Andrew Blane may
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland called have a copy of the said Appeal, and do put in his An.
England, complaining of Three Decrees of the Court of swer thereunto, in Writing, on or before Friday the 17th
Chancery in Ireland of the ist of February and 6th of Day of February next; and Service of this Order upon
July 1805, and 4th of February 1807, made in a certain the said Respondent, or upon any of his Procurators or
Cause wherein Sarah Davis, Widow and Administratrix Agents in the Court of Session in Scotland, shall be
of James Moore Davis, deceased,

John Trumble and Sarah deemed good Service.
his Wife, Joseph Doyle, John Doyle, James Doyle, and
Thomas Booth, were Plaintiffs, and Nathaniel Hone

Upon reading the Petition and Appeal of the Magif- Magistrates,
Esquire, was Defendant ; and praying, “ That the same

trates and Town Council of Aberdeen, complaining of &c. of Aber may be reversed, or that the Appellant may have such

deen against Two Interlocutors of the Lords of Session in Scotland of

Burnett : “ Relief in the Premises, as to this House, in their Lord- the 21st of May 1807, and 17th of June 1808; and « ships great Wisdom, shall seem meet; and that the praying, “ That the same may be reversed, varied, or al“ said Sarah Davis Widow, Jahn Trumble and Sarah his

“ tered, or that the Appellants may have such other Re“ Wife, Josepis Doyle, John Doyle, James Doyle, and Thomas

“ lief in the Premises, as to this House in their Lordships “ Booth, may be required to answer the laid Appeal :"

great Wisdom, shall seem meet; and that John Burnett of It is ORDERED, That the said Sarah Davis, and the Counteswells may be required to answer the said Appeal:” faid several other Persons last named, may have a Copy

It is Ordered, That the said John Burnett may have of the said Appeal, and do put in their Answer or re

a Copy of the said Appeal, and do put in his Answer fpective Answers thereunto, in Writing, on or before Fri- thereunto, in Writing, on or before Friday the 17th Day day the 24th Day of February next.

of February next; and Service of this Order upon the

said Respondent, or upon any one of his Procurators or Bedford to The House being moved, “ That George Bedford, of Agents in the Court of Session in Scotland, hall be enter into

“ Bedford Row, in the County of Middlesex, Gentle deemed good Service. Recogni

man, may be permitted to enter into a Recognizance for zance on it.

“ Nathaniel Hone Esquire, on account of his Appeal de The House being moved, “That James Chalmer, of Chalmer to “ pending in this House, he residing in Ireland.” « Abingdon Street, Westminster, Gentleman, may

be enter into Re per

cognizance It is ORDERED, That the said George Bedford may

“ mitted to enter into a Recognizance for the Magistrates on it. enter into a Recognizance for the said Appellant, as de

" and Town Council of Aberdeen, on account of their Gired.

Appeal depending in this House, they residing in Scot

6 land :" Belch and Upon reading the Petition and Appeal of Mrs. Mary It is ORDERED, That the said James Chalmer may Lindsay

Belch, Wife of Joseph Lindsay, Merchant in Ayr, and the enter into a Recognizance for the said Appellants, as
against Dun. faid Foseph Lindsay, for his Interest; complaining of
das :

desired.
Two Interlocutors of the Lord Ordinary in Scotland, of
the 3d of March and 12th of May 1807; and also of Two The House being moved,

“ That a Day may

be
ap-

Hunter & Co.
Interlocutors of the Lords of Sessions there, of the 6th
“ pointed for hearing the Cause wherein Messieurs againft

Birsland.
and 24th of December 1808 ; and praying,“ That the same “ Hunter, Rainy, and Company, Merchants in Glasgow,
“ may be reversed, varied, or altered, or that the Appel- “ are Appellants, and John Bissland, Merchant, in Glas-
“ lants may have such other Relief in the Premises, as to

gow, is Respondent :"
" this House in their Lordships great Wisdom, shall seem
meet ; and that James Dundas, Accountant in Edina

It is ORDERED, That this House will hear the said

Cause, by Counsel at the Bar, on the first vacant Day for burgh, may be required to answer the said Appeal:”

Causes, after those already appointed. It is ORDERED, That the said James Dundas may have a Copy of the said Appeal, and do put in his The House being moved, “ That a Day may be ap- Hamilton Answer thereunto, in Writing, on or before Friday the pointed for hearing the Cause wherein Anne Hamilton et al. against 17th Day of February next ; and Service of this Order

“ Widow, and others are Appellants, and Adam Nixon Nixon. 4

or is

4.

“ is Respondent ex parte, the Respondent not having “ the Leith Walk Iron Foundery may be required to
put in his Answer thereto, though peremptorily or.

“ answer the faid Appeal :”
“ dered so to do :"

It is ORDERED, That the said John Anderson may It is ORDERED, That this House will hear the said have a copy of the said Appeal, and do put in his AnCause ex parte, by Counsel at the Bar, on the first swer thereunto, in Writing, on or before Friday the vacant Day for Causes after those already appointed, 17th Day of February next ; and Service of this Order unless the Respondent puts in his Answer thereto in the upon any of the Counsel or Agents of the said Refpon. mean Time.

dent, in the Court of Session in Scotland, shall be deemed

good Service. F. and J. Upon reading the Petition and Appeal of Francis Marsh against Marsh and Jeremy Marsh Esquires, complaining of a The Earl of Liverpool (by His Majesty's Command) Papers re

specting the Duigan et al. Decree of the Court of Chancery in Ireland, of the 9th laid before the House:

Negociation of May 1808, made in Three certain Causes, in the No. 1. " Letter from Count Nicolas de Romanzoff to with Ruflia First of which, Francis Marsh and Jeremy Marsh Esquires “ Mr. Secretary Canning, dated Erfurth, 30th Sept. 1808; and France were Plaintiffs, and Catherine Duigan (since deceased), « received October 21st; with Translation.” Also, Widow and Administratrix of Michael Duigan Esquire,

“ Letter from His Majesty the Emperor of all the
John Ryan, James Duigan, and Francis Biddulph Esquire "

Russas and Buonaparté, to His Majesty, dated Erfurth,
(since deceased), were Defendants ; in the Second, the. « 12th OEtober 1868; received Ołtober 21st; with
faid Francis Marsh and Jeremy Marsh were Plaintiffs, 66 Translation." Also,
and the said Catherine Duigan Widow, and John Ryan,

3. “ Letter from M. de Champagny to Mr. Secre-
James Duigan, and Francis Harrison Biddulph, only Son

tary Canning, dated Erfurth, 12th October 1808; recei-
and Heir of said Francis Biddulph, deceased, were De 6 ved October 21st ; with Translation.” Also,
fendants; and in the last, the said Francis Marsh and

“ Letter from Buonaparté and His Majesty the
Jeremy Marsi
) were Plaintiffs, and Thomas Duigan Ad-

“ Emperor of all the Russias to His Majesty, dated
ministrator with the Will annexed of said Catherine

Erfurth, 12th Očlober 1808 ; received October 2ift;
Duigan, and also Administrator de bonis non of said Mi-

" with Translation. Alfo, ,
chael Duigan, deceased, and said John Ryan, James Dui-

5. “ Letter from Mr. Secretary Canning to the Russian
gan, and Francis Harrison Biddulph, were Defendants;

“ Ambassador at Paris, dated Foreign Office, 22d Očlober
“ That the same may be reversed or varied, “ 1808; with Translation.” Also,
« in so far as complained of, or that the Appellants may 6..66 Letter from Mr. Secretary Canning to M. de
66 have such other Relief in the Premises as to this

« Champagny, dated Foreign Office, 22d October 1808;
“ House, in their Lordships great Wisdom, shall seem

“ with Translation.” Also,
“ meet; and that the said Thomas Duigan, John Ryan,

7. “ Letter from Mr. Secretary Canning to the
" and Francis Harrison Biddulph, may be required to an-
“ swer the faid Appeal :"

“ Rufian Ambassador at Paris, dated Foreign Office
“ 28th October 18.8; with Translation."

Also,
It is ORDERED, That the said Thomas Duigan, John

8. 6 Letter from Mr. Secretary Canning to M. de
Ryan, and Francis Harrison Biddulph, may have a Copy

“ Champagny, dated Foreign Office, 28th October 1808."
of the said Appeal, and do put in their Answer or re. Also,
spective Answers thereunto, in Writing, on or before

9. " Official Note.” Also,
Friday the 24th Day of February next.

10. “ Letter from Count Nicolas de Romanzoff to

Mr. Secretary Canning, dated Paris, 31st Očtober Sir W. Eliott Upon reading the Petition and Appeal of Sir William

“ 1808; received November 4th ; with Translation.” against Oliver. Eliott of Stobs, Baronet, complaining of Two Interlo

Also, cutors of the Lord Ordinary in Scotland of the 11th of

11. “ Letter from M. de Champagny to Mr. Secretary
July 1807, and the 16th of February 1808; and Four“ Canning, dated Paris, 31st October 1808 ; received

“ November 4th ; with Translation.” Also,
Interlocutors pronounced by the said Lord Ordinary, re-
fusing Representations against the last mentioned İnter-

12.“ Letter from Count Nicolas de Romanzoff to Mr.
locutor ; and Four other Interlocutors of the said Lord “ Secretary Canning, dated Paris, November 1808;
Ordinary of the 13th of May, the 2d, gth, and 25th of “ received December 6th; with Translation.” Allo,
June 1808 ; and also of an Interlocutor of the First Di-

13.

“ Note with Translation.” Also,
vision of the Lords of Session there, of the 19th of No. 14. “ Letter from M. de Champagny to Mr. Secre-
vember 1808; and praying, " That the same may be tary Canning, dated Paris, 28th November 1808; re-
“ reversed, varied, or altered, or that the Appellant “ ceived December 6th ; with Translation.” Also,
may have such other Relief in the Premises, as to 15.

Note; with Translation.” Also,
“ this House, in their Lordships great Wisdom, shall 16. “ Letter from Secretary Canning to Count Nico-
“ feem meet; and that Andrew Oliver, Mafon in “ las de Romanzoff, dated Foreign Office, 7th December
“ Kirkton, may be required to answer the said “ 1808 ; with Translation.” Also,
“ Appeal :”

17. “ Official Note, dated Foreign Office, 9th Decem

ber 1808." Allo, It is ORDERED, That the said Andrew Oliver may

18. “ Letter from Mr. Secretary Canning to M. have a Copy of the said Appeal, and do put in his An

“ de Champagny, dated Foreign Office, 7th December swer thereunto, in Writing, on or before Friday the

“ 1808.” Also, 17th Day of February next; and Service of this Order

19. “ Official Note, dated Foreign Office, gth Decemupon the faid Respondent, or upon any one of his Pro

" ber 1808." Also, curators or Agents in the Court of Sellion in Scotland,

20. “ Letter from Count Nicolas de Romanzoff to 1hall be deemed good Service.

“ Mr.Secretary Canning, dated Paris, December 1808; Gardner Upon reading the Petition and Appealof George Gardner

“ received December 17th ; with Translation.” Allo, against of Pentonville, in the County of Middlesex, and George An

“ Letter from M. de Champagny to Mr. Secretary Anderson. drew, Writer in Edinburgh, his Factor and Attorney,

“ Canning, dated Paris, 13th December 1803; receivedcomplaining of Four Interlocutors of the Lords Ordinary

“ December 17th ; with Translation.” And also, in Scotland of the 11th of July 1805, the 18th of June, the

22. “ Declaration, dated Westminster, December 15th 4th ef July, and 3d of December 1806; and also of Two

1808, together with a List thereof."
Interlocutors of the Lords of Session there, of the 17th

Which List, being read by the Clerk;
of February, and 24th of December 1808 ; and praying,
“ That the fame may be reversed, varied; or amended, ORDERED, That the said Papers do lie on the Table.
" or that the Appellants may have such other Relief in
“ the Premises, as to this House, in their Lordships great the Service of the House on Monday next.

ORDERED, That all the Lords be fummoned to attend Lords sum.

moned. “ Wisdom, shall seem meet; and that John Anderson of

16th
28th

21.

ORDERED,

D

ORDERED, That all the Lords be summoned to attend PRAYERS. the Service of the House on Thursday next.

The House being informed, " That Mr. Poyle, from E. Clancarty Pemberton A Petition of Charles Oakes and Thomas Willington, “ the Deputy Clerk of the Crown in Ireland,' attended returned a et al. against Defendants in a Writ of Error depending in this House,

“ with the Writs and Returns for ele&ing a Temporal Peranfiger Oakes and

wherein Mary Pemberton and others are Plaintiffs, was “ Peer of Ireland in the Room of John Thomas Earl of
Willington,
Petition for a presented and read; setting forth, “ That the said Plaintiffs “ Clanricarde deceased, with the Certificate of the Clerk
Non-Pros : “ have not afligned Errors within the Time limited by “ of the Crown in Ireland annexed to thein :"

“ their Lordships Order, and therefore praying, That He was called in, and being sworn and examined,
“ the said Writ of Error may be Non-pros'd, with such acquainted their Lordships “ That he received the same
“ Costs as to their Lordships shall seem meet :"

“ from the faid Deputy Clerk of the Crown, and that

they were now in the fame Condition as when he reAnd thereupon the Agents on both Sides were

“ received them ;” and then delivering the same ealled in, and heard at the Bar :

at the Bar ;
And being withdrawn;

He was directed to withdraw.
ORDERED, That the said Petition do lie on the
Table.

Which Certificate was read, and is as follows;
Agents to Orderen, That the Agents in the said Writ of Error (videlicet)
attend. do attend this House on Monday next.

« In pursuance of an Act passed in the Fortieth Year of

“ His Majesty's Reign. intituled, “ An Act to regulate Adjourn. Dominus Cancellarius declaravit præfens Parliamen " the Mode by which the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, tum continuandum effe, usque ad et in diem Lunæ

“ and the Commons, to serve in the Parliament of the vicesimum tertium diem instantis Januarii, horà undecimâ

“ United Kingdom on the Part of Ireland, shall be Aurora, Dominis fic decernentibus.

“ summoned and returned to the said Parliament :"

“ I do hereby certify, that the several Writs hereunto “ annexed, for electing a Temporal Peer of Ireland, in “ the Room of John Thomas Earl of Clanricarde de. “ ceased, did iffue from this Office to the Peers therein

“ severally named, and that the said Peers did severally IE Lunæ, 23° Januarii 180g.

“ make the Returns thereto, which to the said Writs

“ are respectively annexed; and I further certify, that Domini tam Spirituales quam Temporales præsentes

“ it appears from the said Writs and Returns, that the fuerunt:

“ Right Honourable Richard Earl of Clancarty has been

“ chosen by a Majority of Votes to be the Peer to sit and Archiep. Cantuar. Dux CƯMBERLAND. Ds. Hastings.

vote on the Part of Ireland, in the House of Lords of Archiep. Ebor. Dux CAMBRIDGE. Ds. Clifton.

“ the United Kingdom, in the Room of the said John Dux GLOUCESTER. Ds. Sinclair.

“ Thomas Earl of Clanricarde ; all which I attest, this Epus. Hereford.

Ds. Napier.

“ Sixteenth Day of December One thousand eight hun. Epus. Bangor. Ds. Eldon, Cancella

Ds. Ponsonby.

“ dred and eight. Epus. Exon.

rius.
Ds. Boston.

“ Westmeath,
Epus. Fernen, &c.
Comes Camden, Ds. Harrowby.

« Clerk of the Crown in Ireland.” Epus. Cloynen.

Præses.
Ds. Walsingham.

« To the Clerk of the Parliament
Comes Westmorland,
Ds. Heathfield.

or of the United Kingdom of

“ Great Britain and Ireland."
C. P. S.

Ds. Amherst.
March. Stafford. Ds. Douglas of Loch Upon reading the Petition of the Persons confined for King's Bench

Prison and
March. Cornwallis. leven.
Debt in the King's Bench Prison ;

Surrey Debo
Comes Aylesford,
Ds. Auckland.

And also, Upon reading the Petition of the Prisoners torsPetitions.
Senescallus.

Ds. Mulgrave. confined for Debt in His Majesty's County Gaol of Surrey,

Ds. Stewart of Gar.
Comes Dartmouth,

severally complaining of their Distress, and praying
lies.

Relief :
Camerarius.
Ds. Rolle.

It is ORDERED, That the said Petitions do lie on
Comes Winchilfea & Ds. Wellesley.
Ds. Bayning

the Table :
Nottingham.
Comes Sandwich. Ds. Bolton.
Comes Essex.
Ds. Wodehouse.

Ordered, That this House will not receive any Private Bills,
Comes Dalhousie.
Ds, Lilford.

Petition for a Private Bill after IVednesday the First Day of Limitation uk

March next.
Comes Aberdeen.
Ds. St. Helens.

Judges Re-
Comes Oxford &
Ds. Arden.

ports.
ORDERED, That this House will not receive any
Mortimer.
Ds. Erskine.

Report from the Judges upon Petitions presented to
Comes Pomfret.
Ds. Ailfa.

this House for Private Bills after Thursday the Thirtieth
Comes Graham.

Day of March next.
Comes Buckingham-

ORDERED, That the said Orders be printed and pub-
Shire.

lished, and affixed on the Doors of this House and
Comes Bathurst.

Westminster Hall.
Comes Graham.
Comes Mount Edg-
The Order of the Day being read for the Attendance Pemberton et

al against
cumbe.
of the Agents in the Writ of Error wherein Mary Pem-

Oakes and Comes Digby.

berton and others are Plaintiffs, and Charles Oakes and Willington, Comes Liverpool. Thomas Willington are Defendants ;

in Error,
Comes Charlemont.
Comes Glandore.

The Agent was called in ;
Comes Enriskıilen.

And the Agent for the Defendants in Error under-
Comes Erne.

taking to rejoin immediately;
Comes Rosslyn.

The Agents were directed to withdraw.
Comes Limerick.
Comes Normanton.

ORDERED, That the said Errors be argued, by Counsel

at the Bar, on Thursday next.
Viscount Wentworth.
Viscount Sidmouth.

ORDERED, That the Writ of Error wherein William Thompson
Thompson is Plaintiff, and John Bcale is Defendant, be against Beale,

in Error,

Ds. Kenyon.

I

argued

zance on it:

Bill pre•

argued, by Counsel at the Bar, on Monday next; and "varied, or altered, or that the Appellant may have such
that the Judges do then attend.

66 other Relief in the Premises as to this House, in their

Lordships great Wisdom, shall seem meet; and that
Campbell for A Petition of Peter Campbell Junior Esquire, praying “ Patrick Henderson, some time Clerk and Manager of
a Divorce Leave to bring in a Bill to diffolve his Marriage with " the Company of Proprietors of the Aberdeenshire
Bill:

Elizabeth Lewis Woollery his now Wife, and to enable “ Canal Navigation, may be required to answer the said
him to marry again, being offered to be presented to the “ Appeal :"
House ;

It is Ordered, That the said Patrick Henderson may
The House was informed, “ That Mr. Moore was have a copy of the said Appeal, and do put in his
“ attending :"

Answer thereunto, in Writing, on or before Monday the
He was ordered to be called in.

20th Day of February next; and Service of this Order

upon the said Respondent, or upon any one of his Pro-
And being called in accordingly, and sworn at the Bar, curators or Agents in the Court of Session in Scotland,
delivered a Copy of the Proceedings for a Divorce a shall be deemed good Service.
Menfá et Thoro, and the Definitive Sentence in the Con-
fistory Court of the Bishop of London, intituled, “ Campbell

The Answer of the Honourable Mrs. Maria Hay Ld. Advocate against Campbell;” which, he said, he had examined with Mackenzie, and Edward Hey Mackenzie, of Newhall, for Scotland the Original, and that the same was a true Copy. Esquire, her Husband, for his Interest, to the Appeal of againt Mac

et , And then he withdrew.

His Majesty's Advocate for Scotland, on Behalf of His

Majesty, was this Day brought in.
ORDERED, That the said Proceedings and Sentence
do lie on the Table.

The House being moved, “ That Alexander Mundell Mundell to
Then the said Petition was presented and read.
“ of Parliament Street, IVestminster, Gentleman, may be enter into

Recogni“ permitted to enter into a Recognizance for His MaORDERED, That Leave be given to bring in a Bill,“ jesty's Advocate for Scotland, on Behalf of His Maaccording to the Prayer of the said Petition.

“ jesty, on account of his Appeal depending in this

« House;"
Accordingly, The Lord Walsingham presented to the
sented : House a Bill, intituled, “ An Act to diffolve the Marriage It is ORDERED, That the said Alexander Mundell may

“ of Peter Campbell Junior Esquire, with Elizabeth Lewis enter into a Recognizance for the said Appellant, as
“ Woollery his now Wife, and to enable him to marry

desired.
« again ; and for other Purposes therein mentioned.”

The House being moved, “ That a Day may be ap- Hearing The faid Bill was read the First Time.

pointed for hearing the Cause wherein His Majesty's appointed.

“ Advocate for Scotland is Appellant, and the Honour-
ORDERED, That the said Bill be read a Second Time

“ able Mrs. Maria Hay Mackenzie, and Edward Hay
on Thursday the gth Day of February next, and that “ Mackenzie, her Husband, are Respondents :"
Notice thereof be affixed on the Doors of this House,
and the Lords summoned; and that the said Peter Campbell

It is ORDERED, That this House will hear the said
Junior maybe heard by his Counsel at the said Second Rea. Cause, by Counsel at the Bar, on the first vacant Day for
ding to make out the Truth of the Allegations of the Bill ;

Causes after those already appointed. and that the said Elizabeth Lewis Woollery may

have a Copy of the said Bill, and that Notice be given her of the The House being moved, “ That Alexander Mundell, Mundell to faid Second Reading; and that she be at Liberty to be “ of Parliament Street, Westminster, Gentleman, may be enter into Reheard by her Counsel, what she may have to offer against "permitted to enter into a Recognizance for Sir William cognizance on the said Bill at the same Time,

“ Eliott Baronet, on account of his Appeal depending Appeal.

“ in this House, he residing in Scotland :”
Campbell to ORDERED, That Peter Campbell Junior Esquire do It is ORDERED, That the said Alexander Mundell may
attend. attend this House on Thursday the 9th Day of February enter into a Recognizance for the faid Appellant, as

next, in order to his being examined upon the Second desired.
Reading of the Bill, intituled, “ An Ad to diffolve the
“ Marriage of Peter Campbell Junior Esquire with Eliza The House being moved, “ That James Chalmer, of Chalmer to
« beth Lewis Woollery, his now Wife, and to enable him

“ Abingdon Street, Westminster, Gentleman, may be per- enter into Re“ to marry again, and for other Purposes therein men

“ mitted to enter into a Recognizance for the Honour communizance on « tioned," if the House shall think fit, whether there has, “ able Edward Erskine and others, on account of their al. Appeal. or has not been any Collusion, directly or indirectly, on

“ Appeal depending in this House :"
his Part relative to any Act of Adultery that may have
been committed by his Wife; or whether there be any

It is ORDERED, That the said James Chalmer may
Collufion, directly or indire&ly, between him and his Wife,

enter into a Recognizance for the faid Appellants, as

desired.
or any other Person or Persons, touching the said Bill of
Divorce, or touching any Proceedings or Sentence of
Divorce had in the Ecclesiastical Court at his Suit, or

ORDERED, That Mary Stockwell, Ann Boxall, and Ld. Boring

don's Divorce touching any action at Law which may have been brought of Pebruary next, in order to their being examined as

George Tenant, do attend this House on Monday the 6th
by him against any Person for criminal Conversation with
his the said Peter Campbell Junior's Wife ; and also

Witnesses upon the Second Reading of the Bill, intituled,
whether, at the Time of the Adultery of which he com-

“ An Act to dissolve the Marriage of the Right Hoplains, his Wife was by Deed or otherwise by his Consent

“ nourable John Lord Boringdon with the Right Holiving separate and apart from him, and released by him

“ nourable Augusta Lady Boring don, his now Wite, and as far as in him lies from her conjugal Duty; or whether

to enable him to marry again; and for other Purposes

" therein nuentioned.”
she was at the Time of such Adultery cohabiting with
him, and under the Protection and Authority of him as
her Husband.

The House being moved, “ That a Day may be ap. Dempsters “ pointed for hearing the Cause wherein Charles and and Begbie « Cathcart Dempsters, and James Begbie are Appellants; horn et al.

againtt ClegShand against Upon reading the Petition and Appeal of Alexander Henderson, Shand of Tanfield, Advocate in Aberdeen, complaining

“ and Hugh Cleghorn Esquire, and others, are Re-
of Two Interlocutors of the Lords of Session in Scot-

“ spondents :"
land, the first dated the 15th, and signed the 16th of It is ORDERED, That this House will hear the said
November 1808, and the other dated the 8th of December Cause, by Counsel at the Bar, on the first vacant Day
1808; and praying, “ That the same

“ That the same may be reversed; for Causes, after those already appointed.
VOL. XLVII.

The

Bil.