Page images
PDF
EPUB

which, he said, he had examined with the Original, and “ to enable him to marry again, and for other Purposes
that the same was a true Copy.

" therein mentioned.”
And then he withdrew.

The said Bill was read the first Time.
ORDERED, That the faid Proceedings and Sentence Ordered, That the faid Bill be read a Second Time
do lie on the Title.

on Monday the 13th Day of February next, and that No-
Then the said Petition was presented and read.

tice be affixed on the Doors of this House, and the

Lords summoned ; and that the said Jille Gregson may Ordered, That Leave be given to bring in a Bill, be heard by his Counsel at the said Second Reading, to according to the Prayer of the said Petition.

make out the Truth of the Allegations of the Bill; and

that the said Grace Gregfon may have a copy of the Bill pre Accordingly, The Lord Walsingham presented to the Bill, and that Notice be given her of the said Second sented : House, a Bill, intituled, “ An Ačt to diffolve the Mar. Reading ; and that she be at Liberty to be heard by her

“ riage of Richard Campbell Bazett with Margaret Ann Counsel what she may have to offer against the said Bill
Bazett his now Wife, and to enable him to marry at the same Time.
“ again, and for other Purposes therein mentioned.”
The said Bill was read the first Time:

Ordered, That Jesse Greg son do attend this House Gregson to
ORDERED, That the said Bill be read a Second Time his being examined upon the Second Reading of the

on Monday the 13th Day of February next, in order to attend. •
on Friday the 10th Day of February next, and that Bill, intituled, “ An Act to diffolve the Marriage of
Notice be affixed on the Doors of this House, and the
Lords summoned ; and that the said Richard Campbell “ and to enable him to marry again, and for other Pur.

Jelle Greg fon Esquire, with Grace Close his now Wife,
Bazett may be heard by his Counsel at the said Second

“poses therein mentioned,” if the House shall think
Reading, to make out the Truth of the Allegations of fit, whether there has or has not been any Collusion
the Bill, and that the said Margaret Ann Bazett may dire&ly or indirectly on his Part, relative to any Act of
have a Copy of the Bill, and that Notice be given her Adultery that may have been committed by his Wife,
of the said Second Reading ; and that she be at Liberty or whether there be any Collusion directly or indirectly
to be heard by her Counfel what she may have to offer between him and his wife, or any other Person or Per-
against the said Bill at the same Time:

fons touching the said Bill of Divorce, or touching any Bazett to Ordered, That Richard Campbell Bazett do attend Proceedings or Sentence of Divorce had in the Eccleattend.

this House on Friday the roth Day of February next, fiastical Court at his Suit, or touching any Action at Law
in order to his being examined upon the Second Reading which may have been brought by him against any Person
of the Bill, intituled, “ An Act to diffolve the Marriage for Criminal Conversation with his the said Jesse Gregson's
“ of Richard Campbell Bazett with Margaret Ann Wife ; and also whether at the Time of the Adultery of
Bazett his now Wife, and to enable him to marry which he complains his Wife was, by Deed or otherwise
“ again, and for other Purposes therein mentioned,” if by his Consent, living separate and apart from him, and
the House shall think fit, whether there has or has not released by him, as far as in him lies, from her conjugal
been any Collusion directly or indirectly on his Part Duty; or whether she was at the Time of such Adultery
relative to any Act of Adultery that may have been cohabiting with him, and under the Protection and
committed by his Wife; or whether there be any Col. Authority of him as her Husband;
lusion directly or indirectly between him and his wife,
or any other Person or Persons touching the said Bill The Order of the Day being read for the Lords to be Address re-
of Divorce, or touching any Proceedings or Sentence summoned,

specting the

Negotiations of Divorce had in the Ecclesiastical Court at his Suit,

It was moved to resolve, " That an humble Address with Russia or touching any Action at Law, which may have been brought by him against any Person for Criminal Con

“ be presented to His Majesty, to return His Majesty and France.

" the Thanks of this House for His Majesty's most versation with his the said Richard Cumpbell Bazett's

gra

56 cious Communication of the Proposals for opening a
Wife; and also whether, at the Time of the Adultery
of which he complains, his Wife, was by Deed or

Negociation for Peace, which were received by His

Majesty from the Governments of Russia and of otherwise by his Consent, living separate and apart from

France, and of the Correspondence relating thereto : him, and released by him, as far as in him lies, from her

“ To assure His Majesty, that whilst this House has seen conjugal Duty; or whether she was at the Time of such

“ with the liveliest Satisfaction and Gratitude the renewed Adultery cohabiting with him, and under the Protection

“ Assurances of His Majesty's Readiness and Desire to and Authority of him as her Husband.

“ enter into Negociations for a general Peace, on Terms

66 consistent with the Honour of His Majesty's Crown, Gregion for a A Petition of Jeffe Gregson Esquire, praying Leave to Divorce Bill: bring in a Bill to diffolve his Marriage with Grace his

“ with Fidelity to His Engagements, and with the pernow Wife, and to enable him to marry again, being“ fame Time acknowledge the Wisdom and Justice of

“ manent Repose and Security of Europe, they at the offered to be presented to the House;

“ the Demand made by His Majesty, that the Govern-
The House was informed, “ That Mr. John Rickett ment of Spain, acting in the Name of his Catholic
“ junior, was attending ;"

Majesty Ferdinand VII., should be admitted as a Party
He was ordered to be called in.

“ to the Negociations in which His Majesty was invited

“ to engage, and His Majesty's Magnanimity in declinAnd being called in accordingly, and sworn at the Bar,

ing to coinmence the Negociation when that Demand
delivered a Copy of the Proceedings a Mensá et Thoro, “ had been explicitly and peremptorily refused: To assure
and the Definitive Sentence in the Consistory Court of the “ His Majesty, that His Majesty may rely upon their De-
Bishop of London, intituled “ Gregson against Gregson,"

“ termination to continue to His Majesty their firm and
which, he said, he had examined with the Original, and
that the same was a true Copy.

“ affectionate Support in the great Cause in which His

Majesty is engaged ; and to enable His Majesty, by.
And then he withdrew.

66 the effectual Prosecution of the War, to conduct it

“ to a Termination compatible with Justice and with
ORDERED, That the said Proceedings and Sentence
do lie on the Table.

“ Honour."
Then the said Petition was presented and read.

Which being objected to,

After Debate,
ORDERED, That Leave be given to bring in a Bill,
according to the Prayer of the said Petition.

The Question was put thereupon ?

It was resolved in the Affirmative.
Accordingly, The Lord Walsingham presented to the
sented : House a Bill, intituled, “An Act to diffolve the Marriage of ORDERED, That the said Address be presented to His
Jelle Gregson Esquire with Grace Close his now Wife, and Majesty by the Lords with White Staves.

Dominus

Bill pro

Adjourn.

Dominus Cancellarius declaravit præsens Parliamen- spective Answers thereunto, in Writing, on or before tum continuandum esse usque ad et in diem Veneris, Friday the 24th Day of February next; and Service of this vicesimum septimum diem instantis Januarii

, horâ unde. Order upon the said Respondents, or upon any of their
cimâ Auroræ, Dominis fic decernentibus.

Procurators or Agents in the Court of Session in Scotland,
shall be deemed good Service.

DIE

in Error.

The House being moved, “ That Charles Vicars Hunter to en

Hunter of Lincoln's Inn, in the County of Middlesex, ter into a ReI E Veneris, 27° Januarii 1809. “ Gentleman, may be permitted to enter into a Re- cognizance

on it. “ cognizance for Robert Duff Esquire, on account of Domini tam Spirituales quam Temporales præsentes

“ his Appeal depending in this House, he residing in

« Scotland :"
fuerunt:
Archiep. Cantuar. Ds. Eldon, Cancella- Ds. Napier.

It is ORDERED, That the said Charles Vicars Hunter
rius.
Ds. Walsingham.

may enter into a Recognizance for the said Appellant, as Epus. Carliol.

desired.
Ds. Hood of Cather-
Comes Suffolk &
Berkshire.
ington.

Upon reading the Petition and Appeal of Christopher Tyler and

Tyler and William Pincheon, complaining of a Decree of Pincheon PRAYERS.

the Court of Exchequer, of the 28th Day of February Morgan. Pemberton et The Order of the Day being read for hearing Counsel 1807, made

in a certain Cause, wherein John Morgan al. against further to argue the Errors afligned upon the Writ of Brockes, fince deceased, and William Pincheon, were De

Gentleman was Plaintiff, and Christopher Tyler, William
Oakes and
Willington,

Error, wherein Mary Pemberton and others are Plain. fendants ; and praying, “ That the same may be reversed,
tiffs, and Charles Oakes and Thomas Willington are De-

16 and the Bill dismissed, or that the same may be
fendants;

“ varied, as to this House in their Lordships great Counsel were accordingly called in:

“ Wisdom shall seem meet; and that John Morgan

may be required to answer the said Appeal :"
And the Second Counsel for the Defendants having
been fully heard ; as also One Counsel for the Plaintiffs, It is Ordered, That the said John Morgan may have
by way of Reply;

a Copy of the faid Appeal, and do put in his Answer

thereunto, in Writing, on or before Friday the joth Day The Counsel were directed to withdraw:

of February next; and Service of this Order upon the ORDERED, That the further Consideration of the Clerk in Court of the said Respondent, in the said Court faid Cause be put off to Tuesday next.

of Exchequer, shall be deemed good Service. Smith and After hearing Counsel in Part, in the Cause wherein Dominus Cancellarius declaravit præsens Parliamen- Adjourn. Robertson

the Reverend Doctor John Smith and the Reverend tum continuandum esse usque ad et in diem Lunæ, tricesi. againft Mac- Doctor George Robertson are Appellants, and Major mum diem instantis Januarii, horâ decima Auroræ, Hector Macneil is Respondent :

Dominis fic decernentibus.
It is ORDERED, That the further hearing of the said
Cause be put off to Tuesday the 14th Day of February

next :

Bp. Carlisle

D'

ORDERED, That the Lord Bishop of Carlife be, I E Lunæ, 30° Januarii 1809. to preach on and he is hereby desired to preach before this House, the Faft Day. on Wednesday the 8th of February next, in the Abbey Domini tam Spirituales quam Temporales præsentes Church Westminster, being the Day appointed by His

fuerunt. Majesty's Royal Proclamation for a General Fast.

Archiep. Cantuar.

Ds. Eldon, Cancella- Ds. Walsingham. rius.

Ds. Bolton. Duff et al.

Upon reading the Petition of John Duff Esquire and Archiep. Ebor. against

others, Appellants in a Cause depending in this House, Epus. Carliol. Comes Glandore. Angus:

to which the Reverend Alexander Angus is Respondent; Epus. Bangor.
setting forth, “ That on the 7th of March 1806 the Epus. Exon.
“ Petitioners presented their Appeal to their Lordships, Epus. Sarum.
“ from several Interlocutors of the Court of Session, Epus. Fernen, &c.
“ and the Cause stands appointed for hearing; that the
“ Petitioners being advised to withdraw their faid PRAYERS.
is Appeal, humbly pray, That they may have Leave to
“ withdraw the said Appeal (the Respondent by his The Answer of Dame Margaret Jobnstone and others, E. Hopetour
Agents consenting) without Costs :"
to the Appeal of James Earl of Hopetoun, was this Day against John-)

ftone et al. Appeal with It is ORDERED, That the Petitioners be at Liberty to

brought in. drawn. withdraw their faid Appeal without Costs, as desired.

Then, in order to solemnize this Day, being appointed King

by Act of Parliament to be observed as a Day of Fasting Charles's Duff againit Upon reading the Petition and Appeal of Robert Duff and Humiliation for the Martyrdom of King Charles the Marvedom Magistrates of Muirtown, Esquire, complaining of an Interlocutor of Inverness;

First,
of the Lords of Session in Scotland, in the Second Divi-
fion, of the 16th and signed the 17th of November 1808; Dominus Cancellarius declaravit præsens Parliamen- Adjourn.
also of an' Interlocutor of the said Lords of the 6th and

tum continuandum esse usque ad et in diem Martis,
figned the 8th of December 1808 ; and also of another tricesimum primum diem instantis Januarii, horâ unde.
Interlocutor of the said Lords of the 23d of December cimâ Auroræ, Dominis fic decernentibus,
1808 ; and praying, " That the same may be reversed,
“ varied, or altered, or that the Appellant may have such
" other Relief in the Premises, as to this House in their

Lordships great Wisdom shall seem meet ; and that
“ the Magistrates and Town Council of the Burgh of

Inverness may be required to answer the said Appeal :"

It is ORDERED, That the said Magistrates and Town Council of the Burgh of Inverness may have a Copy of the faid Appeal, and do put in their Answer, or re

D'

I E Martis, 31° Januarii 1809.

niker, and John Minet Henniker, Esquires, other Exe

cutors named in the said Will of the said Edward Earl Domini tam Spirituales quam Temporales præsentes of Aldborough, were Defendants; and praying, “ That fuerunt.

“ the same may be reversed or varied, and such further

“ Order made in the Premises as to this House, in their Archiep. Cantuar. Ds. Eldon, Cancella- Ds. Napier.

“ Lordships' great Wisdom, shall seem meet; and that rius.

Ds. Walsingham. Epus. Dunelm.

John Wing field Stratford may be required to answer Epus. Carliol.

Ds. Douglas of Loch-
Dux Norfolk, Mares-

“ the said Appeal :"

leven. Epus. Ciceftrien. callus.

It is ORDERED, That the said John Wing field Stratford
Comes Suffolk fr

may have a Copy of the said Appeal, and do put in his
Berkshire.

Answer thereunto in Writing, on or before Tuesday the
Comes Fitzwilliam.

7th Day of March next; and Service of this Order upon
Comes Digby.

the Clerk in Court of the said Respondent, in the said

Court of Chancery in Ireland, shall be deemed good
PRAYERS.

Service.
Rothwell Upon reading the Petition of Prisoners confined for
Debtors Debt in His Majesty's Gaol at Rothwell, in the County

The House being moved, “ That John Stanley Smart, Smart to ene Petition. of York, complaining of their Distress, and praying

“ of Red Lion Square, in the County of Middlesex, ter into Reo

cognizance Relief :

“ Gentleman, may be permitted to enter into a Recog; on it. “ nizance for George Powell

, on account of his Appeal It is ORDERED, That the faid Petition do lie on the

“ depending in this House, he residing in Ireland :"
Table.

It is ORDERED, That the said John Stanley Smart
Sir David The Lord Chancellor acquainted the House, “ That may enter into a Recognizance for the faid Appellant,
Baird's An. 6 in pursuance of the Order of this House on Wednesday as desired.
Swer to Vote
of Thanks.

“ last, he had transmitted their Lordships' Resolution of
" that Day, giving the Thanks of this House to Lieute-

The House being moved, “ That a Day, may be ap- E. Hopetour
nant General Sir David Baird, and others, for their
“ distinguished Conduct and exemplary Valour displayed

“ pointed for hearing the Cross Appeal, wherein James againft John" in the Battle of Corunna, whereby the complete Re

" Earl of Hopetoun is Appellant, and Dame Margaret ftone et al. “ pulse and signal Defeat of the Enemy on every Point

Johnstone and others are Respondents :"
“ of Attack was effected, and the safe and unmolested It is ORDERED, That this House will hear the faid
“ Embarkation of the Army secured, in the Presence of Cross Appeal, by Counsel at the Bar, at the same Time
a French Army of superior Force; and that he had with the Original Appeal, wherein Dame Margaret
" received a Letter from the faid Lieutenant General Sir Johnstone and others are Appellants, and James Earl of
David Baird, dated Portsmouth, 29th January 1809, Hopetoun is Respondent.
“ in which he returns an Answer to the faid Refo-
«lution.”

Upon reading the Petition of William Abbot, Deputy Chandos
The said Letter was read by the Clerk; and is as
Registrar of the Consistory and Archdeaconry Courts of Peerage, Pe.

tition for Rea follows; viz.

Canterbury; setting forth, “ That in the Prosecution of

delivery of " the Claim to the Barony of Chandos (on Behalf of the Documents. « My Lord, Portsmouth, 29th January 1809• “

“ Crown), several original Wills, Books of Wills and " I have the Honour to acknowledge the Receipt of “ Administrations, and Registers, were produced in Evi

your Lordship’s Letter, together with the gratifying “ dence to the Lords Committees for Privileges, in « Enclosures it contained, which I have haltened to “ pursuance of their special Order, which it is necessary u communicate.

“ should be returned to the Petitioner, in order to their
“ Allow me, through the Medium of your Lordship, being replaced in the feveral Offices from which the
to return to the highest Assembly of this Nation my “ same were taken ;" and therefore praying, “That

own personal Thanks, as well as those of the Army “ their Lordships will be pleased to order that the faid
“ in general, for the very honourable and flattering original Wills, and the Books of Wills and Admi-
“ Marks of Approbation, which that House has con “ nistrations and Registers, may be re-delivered to the
“ ferred upon our late Conduct; an Honour of which « Petitioner :"
“ no one can be more fully sensible than myself, having
“ had the good Fortune to be deemed worthy of this

It is ORDERED, That the said original Wills, and the
“ eminent Distinction on Four several Occasions; and Books of Wills and Administrations, and Registers, be
“ I trust that God will still spare me to devote to my re-delivered to the Petitioner, as desired.
“ King and Country the Remnant of that Life hitherto
“ spent in their Service.

Upon reading the Petition and Appeal of John Reid Reid et al.
“ I beg Leave to offer to your Lordship, individually, and Company, David Sim, and Robert Brown Junior, againft Slack

my belt Thanks, for the Trouble you have taken in Merchants in Glasgow, complaining of Two Interlocu. “ communicating this satisfactory Intelligence, and for tors of the Lord Ordinary in Scotland, of the 17th of

your own Congratulations upon the Occasion. February, and 12th of November 1807; and also of Two

“ I have the Honour to be, my Lord, with the utmost Interlocutors of the Lords of Session there, of the 15th « Respect and Gratitude,

of January, and oth of June 1808; and praying, “ Your Lordship's most devoted,

“ That the same may be reversed, varied, or amended, " And very obedient humble Servant, “ or that the Appellants may have such other Relief in

« D. Baird. “ the Premises as to this House in their Lordships great

« Lieutenant General." “ Wisdom thall seem ineet; and that Meffieurs Robert « The Rt. Hon. the Lord Chancellor,

Slack and Company, Merchants in Lisbon, and Allan 66 &c. &c. &c."

« Brown, Merchant in Glasgow, their Agent, may be

6 required to answer the said Appeal :"
Powell Upon reading the Petition and Appeal of George Powell,
against complaining of a Decree of the Court of Chancery in It is ORDERED, That the said Mellieurs Robert Slack
Stratford :

Ireland, of the. 3d Day of February 1808, made in a and Company and Allan Brown may have a Copy of
certain Cause, wherein the Honourable John Wing field the said Appeal, and do put in their Answer or respec-
Stratford, Administrator of Edward Earl of Aldborough, tive Answers thereunto, in writing, on or before Tues
deceased, was Plaintiff ; and George Powell Esquire, day the 28th Day of February next; and Service of this
Charles Bowen Esquire, Devisee and Executor named in order upon any of the Counsel or Agents of the said
the last Will of the said Edward Earl of Aldborough, Respondents in the Court of Selion in Scotland, shall be
Hugh Aldborough Bowen, eldest Son of the said Charles deemed good Service,
Bowen, John Lord Henniker, Brydges Trecotbieck Hen.
VOL. XLVII.

F

Upon

Baseley et Upon reading the Petition and Appeal of Thomas Leith, complaining of Five Interlocutors of the Lords
Ux. against Bafelsy and Sarah his wife, and Charles Henry Bafeley, of Council and Session in Scotland, of the 22d of No-
Huguenin

Sophia Ann Susan Bafeley, and Walter James Baseley, vember 1894, the 28th of May 1805, Two of the 15th et Ux.

Infants, by the said Thomas Bafeley their Father, and of June and the 24th of June 1808; and also of Four
next Friend, complaining of a Decree of the Court of Interlocutors of the Lord Ordinary there, of the 25th
Chancery of the 230 Day of November 1807, made in of January and the uth of July 1807, the 19th of Fe-
a certain Cause wherein Henry Huguenin and Ann his bruary and the 4th of March 1808; and praying,
Wife, late Ann Hill Widow, were plaintiffs, and Thumas “ That the same may be reversed, varied, or altered,
Baseley and Sarah his Wife, and Charles Henry Baseley, “ or that the Appellants may have such other Relief in
Sophia Ann Susan Bafeley, and Walter James Bafeley “ the Premises, as to this House, in their Lordships great
Infants, by the said Thomas Baseley their Father, and “ Wisdom, shall seem meet : And that Thomas Booth
next Friend, James Buck, George Buck, and William “ and Company, Merchants in Liverpool ; William
Taylor, were Defendants; and praying, " That the Jeffray and Company, Merchants in Glasgow; Jabella
“ same may be reversed, and the Complainants Bill Colquhoun and Walter Logan Esquire, for himself and
« dismissed, or such other Order made in the Premises “ as representing the Forth and Clyde Canal Company
“ as to this House, in their Lordships great Wisdom, may be required to answer the said Appeal :"
“ shall seem meet; and that Henry Huguenin and Ann
“ his Wife, late Ann Hill Widow, may be required to

It is ORDERED, That the said Thomas Booth and Com.
“ answer the the Appeal :"

pany,

and the said several other Persons last named,

may have a copy of the said Appeal, and do put in their It is Ordered, That the said Henry Huguenin and Answer or respective Answers thereunto, in Writing, on Ann his Wife, may have a copy of the said Appeal, and or before Tuesday the 28th Day of February next; and do put in their Answer or respective Answers thereunto, Service of this Order upon the said Respondents, in Writing, on or before Tuesday the 14th Day of Fe or upon any of their Procurators or Agents in the bruary next.

Court of Session in Scotland, shall be deemed good Ser

vice. Allan against Upon reading the Petition and Appeal of James Allan Cleghorns: Esquire, late of Mincing Lane, London, now of Clifton

ORDERED, That the further Consideration of the Pemberton et near Bristol, complaining of Seven Interlocutors of the Writ of Error, wherein Mary Pemberton Widow, and al. against Lord Ordinary in Scotland, of the 28th of January 1802, others are plaintiffs, and Charles Oakes and Thomas Willington, the 16th of May and 27th of November 1805, the 12th Willington are Defendants, which stands appointed for in Error. and 15th of November and the 13th and 20th of De this Day, be put off to Friday next : cember 1006; and also of Three Interlocutors of the Lords of Session there, of the 7th (and signed the 8th) wherein the Reverend Doctor John Smith, and the Re- Robertson,

ORDERED, That the further hearing of the Cause Smith and of July, the 9th of July, and the 23d (and signed the verend Doctor George Robinson, are Appellants, and

against Mac 24th) of December 1808; and praying, “That the same Major Hector Macneil is Respondent, which stands ap

neil. may be reversed, varied, or amended, or that the Ap pointed for this Day, be put off to Friday next : “ pellant may have such other Relief in the Premises,

as to this House in their Lordships great Wisdom “ shall seem meet; and that Doctor Robert Cleghorn

ORDERED, That the Thanks of this House be, and Thanksto Bp. “ Physician in Glasgow, and Miss Helen Cleghorn; Sermon by him preached before this Houfe Yesterday,

are hereby given to the Lord Bishop of Oxford, for the Oxford for Pursuers, may be required to answer the faid Appeal" Sermon by him preached before this Houfe Yesterday, his Sermon.

in the Abbey Church Westminster ; and he is hereby It is ORDERED, That the faid Doctor Robert Cleg- desired to cause the same to be forthwith printed and born and Helen Cleghorn may have a copy of the said published. Appeal, and do put in their Answer or respeclive Answers thereunto, in Writing, on or before Tuesday the Dominus Cancellarius declaravit præsens Parliamen- Adjourn. 28th Day of February next; and Service of this Order tum continuandum effe usque ad et in diem Mercurii, upon the said Respondents, or upon any of their known primum diem Februarii, jam prox. sequen. horå undecima Counsel or Agents in the Court of Session in Scotland, Auroræ, Dominis fic decernentibus. shall be deemed good Service.

Drace to en The House being moved, " That Charles Druce of ter into Re

Billeter Square, in the City of London, Gentleman, cognizance

may be permitted to enter into a Recognizance for I E Mercurii, 1° Februarii 1809. on it.

James Allan Esquire, on account of his Appeal de-
pending in this House, he residing in the Country:”

Domini tam Spirituales quam Temporales præsentes
It is ORDERED, That the said Charles Druce may be

fuerunt:
permitted to enter into a Recognizance for the said

Epus. Carliol.

Dux CUMBERLAND. Ds. Hastings.
Appellant, as desired.

Ds. Napier.
Ds. Eldon, Cancella-

Ds. Walsingham. Roxburghe

rius. It was moved, “ That the Order made on Wednesday

Ds. Amherst. Peerage “ last, “ That the Committee for Privileges, to who

Dux Norfolk, Mares. Ds. Auckland. deferred. “ referred the several Petitions claiming the Titles,

callus.

Ds. Bolton. “ Honours, and Dignities of Duke and Earl of Roxa

March. Cornwallis.

Ds. St. Helen's. burghe, do meet to consider further of the said Claim

Ds. Redesdale. “ on Thursday the 2d Day of February next ; and that

Comes Suffolk & Ds. Ellenborough. “ Notice thereof be given to His Majesty's Attorney

Berkshire.

Ds. Arden. “ General, and the Lord Advocate for Scotland," be now

Comes Essex. Ds, Erskine.
6 read :"

Comes Buckingham-
The same was accordingly read by the Clerk.

Shire.
ORDERED, That the said Order be discharged.

Comes Bathurs.

Comes Grosvenor.
ORDERED, That the Committee for Privileges do

Comes Liverpool.
meet to consider further of the said Claim on Tuesday

Comes Glandore. the 7th of February next; and that Notice thereof be

Comes Rosslyn.
given to His Majesty's Attorney General, and the Lord

Comes Normanton.
Advocate for Scotland.

Comes Charleville.
Stewart

Viscount Melville. Upon reading the Petition and Appeal of Richard againit Booth

Viscount Sidmouth. et al. Stewart, late Master and Owner of the Sloop Hunter of

PRAYERS.

PRAYERS.

Copy of the said Appeal, and do put in their Answer Thompson The Order of the Day being read for hearing Counsel Wednesday the First Day of March next; and Service

or respective Answers thereunto in Writing, on or before against Beale,

to argue the Errors assigned upon the Writ of Error, of this Order upon the faid Respondents, or upon in Error.

wherein William Thompson is Plaintiff, and John Beale is
Defendant ; and for the Judges to attend.

their known Counsel or Agents in the Court of Session

in Scotland, shall be deemed good Service.
Counsel were accordingly called in ;
And the First Counsel for the Plaintiff being heard ;

The House being moved, “ That James Campbell of Campbell to

" Duke Street Westminster, Gentleman, may be permitted enter into ReThe Counsel were directed to withdraw. “ to enter into a Recognizance for Benjamin Moore, on Moore's ApORDERED, That the further hearing of the said Cause

account of his Appeal depending in this House, he peal. be put off to Monday next; and that the Judges do then

residing in Scotland :" attend.

It is ORDERED, That the said James Campbell may Writs of

enter into a Recognizance for the said Appellant, as The Lord Ellenborough, Lord Chief Justice of the

desired. Error deli.

Court of King's Bench, in the usual Manner, delivered
vered:
in at the Table, Nine Writs of Error.

Upon reading the Petition and Appeal of David Kinlochs
In the First of whịch,
Kinloch, only Son of Sir Alexander Kinloch of Gilmerton

against

Rocheid. Goulburn Edward Goulburn is Plaintiff,

Baronet, and of Mary Anne Kinloch and Harriet Kinloch, against Raine:

and

Daughters of the said Sir Alexander Kinloch, all Infants,
Philip Raine Defendant.

and of the said Sir Alexander Kinloch Baronet, as Guardian

and Administrator in Law of his said Infant Children, and In the Second,

on their Behalf, complaining of Five Interlocutors of the Gibsone John Gibsone is Plaintiff,

Lords of Session in Scotland of the 17th and 18th of against Sir M.

and Ridley et al.

December 1799, the 27th of May 1800, the 27th of
Sir Matthew White Ridley Baronet, Matthew January 18c7, and the First of March 1808; and

Bell and Thomas Gibson, are Defendants. praying, “ That the same may be reversed, varied, or
In the Third,

“ amended, in so far as they sustain the Defences of Geddes and

Alexander Geddes and Thomas Milliken are “ Prescription to any Extent or Effect; or that the
Milliken
Plaintiffs,

Appellants may have such other Relief in the Preagainst De

and

“ mises, as to this House, in their Lordships great WisTafet : Fermin Je Tastet is Defendant.

“ dom, shall seem meet; and that James Rocheid of In

verleith Esquire, may be required to answer the faid In the Fourth,

" Appeal :" Johnson

James Johnson is Plaintiff, against

and

It is Ordered, That the said James Rocheid may
Hillier :
Robert Hillier is Defendant.

have a Copy of the said Appeal, and do put in his Answer
In the Fifth,

thereunto in Writing, on or before Wednesday the First

Day of March next : and Service of this Order upon Parry against

John Parry is Plaintiff, Younge :

the said Respondent, or upon any One of his known
and

Counsel or Agents in the Court of Session in Scotland,
Edward Younge, Defendant.

shall be deemed good Service.
In the Sixth,
Milliken and

Thomas Milliken and Alexander Geddes are Upon reading the Petition and Appeal of Houston Wallace et al. Geddes Plaintiffs,

Wallace Esquire, Lieutenant in the 14th Regiment of against Walo against

and Philipps:

Light Dragoons, one of the Three surviving Children of lace et al. : John Philipps the elder, and John Philipps the the deceased Alexander Wallace Banker in Edinburgh, and younger, Defendants.

of John Dundas Esquire, One of the Clerks to His Ma

jesty's Signet, Captain Ninian Louis of Auchen Cowie, In the Seventh,

and David Falconer Esquire, of Carlourie, Curators of Milliken Thomas Milliken is Plaintiff,

Alexander and Anne Wallace, the other surviving Children against Marth

and et al.

of the said deceased Alexander Wallace; complaining of William Marsh and others are Defendants.

an Interlocutor of the Lords of Session in Scotland, of In the Eighth,

the 28th, and signed the 29th of January 1807; and also John Mills'is Plaintiff,

of another Interlocutor of the said Lords of the 24th of Nicholson

and

February 1807 ; and praying, “ That the fame may be and Wolff: Frederick Nicholson and George Wolf are

“ reversed, varied, or amended, or that the Appellants Defendants.

may have such other Relief in the Premises, as to this

“ House, in their Lordship great Wisdom, fhall seem And in the last,

meet; and that Robert Alexander Wallace, only Child Lewin and

Robert Lewin and Gregory Watkins are Plaintiffs, Watkins

“ of the late Major Robert Wallace, and Vans Hathorn

and against

“ Writer to the Signet, his Tutor, and the Trustees of Wilshere et al. William Wilfbere and others Defendants.

“ the deceased Alexander Houstoun, may be required to

“ answer the faid Appeal :" Grieve against Upon reading the Petition and Appeal of Adam Grieve and

Grieve, eldest son and Heir of Line of the deceased It is ORDERED, That the said Robert Alexander Wal.
Cunningham

William Grieve, Original Lessee of the Lands of Bar. lace, and the several other Persons last named, may have
laugh, and others, presently residing in Edinburgh; a Copy of the said Appeal, and do put in their Answer
complaining of Two Interlocutors of the Lords of or respective Answers thereunto in Writing on or before
Session in Scotland, the First dated the 18th and signed Wednesday the First Day of March next; and Service
the 25th of February 1806; and the Second dated the of this Order upon the said Respondents, or upon any
10th and signed the 11th of March 1807; and praying, of their known Counsel or Agents in the Court of Seslion
“ That the same may be reversed, varied, or altered, in Scotland, shall be deemed good Service.
“ fo far as appealed from, or that the Appellant may The House being moved, “ That John Richardsone of Richardsone
“ have such other Relief in the Premises, as to this House

Fludyer Street Westminster, Gentleman, may be permit- to enter into “ in their Lordships great Wisdom shall seem meet; and

Recogni“ ted to enter into a Recognizance for Houston Wallace " that William Grieve and Lieutenant Colonel Francis

Esquire, and others, on account of their Appeal de-
Cunningham may be required to answer the faid Ap- “ pending in this House, they living in Scotland :"

It is ORDERED, That the said John Richardsone may
It is ORDERED, That the said William Grieve and enter into a Recognizance for the faid Appellants, as
Lieutenant Colonel Francis Cunningham may have a desired.

Upon

Mills against

zance on it.

“ peal :"

« PreviousContinue »