Page images
PDF
EPUB

et al:

L. Ailja.

[ocr errors]

Gainsburgh Hodie 2° vice lecta est Billa, intituled, “ An Act for more The House being moved, “ That James Chalmer of Chalmer to
Paving Bill.

enter into a effectually improving the Streets, Lanes, and public Abingdon Street, Westminster, may be permitted to

Recognizance
Passages in the Town of Gainsburgh, in the County of “ enter into a Recognizance for Jehn Geddes, on ac- on it.
Lincoln; and for laying a Duty on Coals brought to count of his Appeal depending in this House, he re-
" the said Town to be fold."

fiding in Scotland :"
ORDERED, That the said Bill be cominitted to the It is ORDERED, That the said James Chalmer may
Consideration of the Lords following:

enter into a Recognizance for the said Appellant, as

desired.
Ld. Privy Seal. L. Bp. Carlisle.

L. Clifton.
L. Bp. Chester.
E. Sandwich.

L. Walsingham.
L. Auckland.

Upon reading the Petition and Appeal of the Reve. Carmichael
E. Buckinghan-

L. Hood of Cather. rend John Carmichael, Presentee to the Parish of Kinloch against Scott

L. Hood of Cather- in the County of Perth; complaining of Three Interlo.
Jhire.

ington.
E. Clancarty.

cutors of the Lords of Council and Session in Scotland,

L. Bolton.
E. Charleville.

L. Redesdale.

as Commissioners of Teinds, of the 10th of June 1807,

the 2d of March 1808, and 8th of February 1809; and
L. Arden.
L. Sheffield.

praying, “ That the fame may be reversed, varied, or
“ amended, or that the Appellant may have such other

“ Relief in the Premises, as to this House, in their
Their Lordships, or any Five of them, to meet on “Lordships great Wisdom, shall seem meet; and that

Wednesday next, at Ten o'Clock in the Forenoon, " James Scott and others, may be required to answer
in the Prince's Lodgings, near the House of “ the said Appeal :"
Peers; and to adjourn as they please.

It is ORDERED, That the said James Scott and others
Rotherham Hodie 2* vice lecta eft Billa, intituled, " An Ad for may have a Copy of the faid Appeal, and do put in their

Answer or respective Answers thereunto, in Writing, on
Road Bill. “ making and maintaining a Road from Rotberham to
Swinton, in the West Riding of the County of York.” Service of this Order upon any of the Counsel or Agents

or before Monday the 27th Day of March next; and
ORDERED, That the said Bill be committed to the of the said Respondents, in the Court of Session in
Consideration of the Lords Committees afore-named: Scotland, shall be deemed good Service.
Their Lordships, or any Five of them, to meet on

The House being moved,
the same Day, at the same Place; and to adjourn

“ That John Richardsone Richardsone as they please. “ of Fluyder Street, IVestminster, Gentleman, may be to enter into

Recogni“ permitted to enter into a Recognizance for the Reve

zance on it.

“ rend John Carmichael, on account of his Appeal Hursley, &c.

Hodie 2* vice lecta est Billa, intituled, “ An Act for Enclosure enclosing Lands in the Parishof Hursley, and the Manor

depending in this House, he living in Scotland :" Bill. " of Murdon, in the County of Southampton.

It is Ordered, That the said John Richardsone may

enter into a Recognizance for the said Appellant, as
ORDERED, That the faid Bill be committed to the

desired.
Consideration of the Lord Committees afore-named :
Their Lordships, or any Five of them, to meet on

Upon reading the Petition and Appeal of Patrick Warner
the fame Day, at the same Place; and to adjourn terlocutors of the Lord Ordinary in Scotland, of the 17th
Warner Esquire, of Ardeer ; complaining of Three In- againft Cura

ninghame :
as they pleale.

of January, the 3d of February, and the roth of March
Moens, for a Upon reading the Petition of Adrian Moens, praying 1797 ; also of Four Interlocutors of the Lords of Session
Naturaliza-
Leave to bring in a Bill for his Naturalization :

there, of the 24th of January 1798, the gth and 12th of
tion Bill :
It is ORDERED, That Leare be given to bring in a February, and the 23d of November 1802 ; and also of

an Interlocutor of the said I.ords of the 7th, and signed Bill, according to the Prayer of the said Petition.

the 14th of February 1809; and praying, “ That the Bill fre

Accordingly, The Lord Walsingham presented to the “ fame may be reversed, varied, or amended, or that the fented. House, a Bill, intituled, “ An Act for naturalizing Adrian Appellant may have such other Relief in the Premises, “ Moens.

“ as to this House, in their Lordships great Wisdom, The said Bill was read the First Time.

“ shall seem meet; and that Robert Reid Cunninghame,

" of Auchenharrie, may be required to answer the said Geddes Upon reading the Petition and Appeal of John Geddes

of Appeal:
against of the Verreville Glass Works near Glasgow; com-
Hardies :
plaining of Two Interlocutors of the Lord Ordinary in

It is Ordered, That the said Robert Reid Cunninghame
Scotland, of the 12th and 21st of May 1807; also of may have a copy of the said Appeal, and do put in his
Two Interlocutors of the Lords of Session there, of Answer thereunto, in Writing, on or before Monday the
the 25th of June 1807, and it of February 1809, 27th Day of March next; and Service of this Order
adhering to the said Interlocutors of the Lord Or. upon the said Respondent, or upon any of his known
dinary; and also of an Interlocutor of the said Lords of Counsel or Agents in the Court of Session in Scotland,
Session of the 18th of February 1809, decerning for shall be deemed good Service.
Expences; and praying, “ That the same may be re-
“ versed, varied, or altered, or that the Appellant may

The House being moved, " That John Richardsone Richardsons “ have such other Relief in the Premises, as to this

" of Fluyder Street, Westminster, Gentleman, may be to enter into “ House, in their Lordships great Wisdom, fhall seem “ permitted to enter into a Recognizance for Patrick Recogni

zance on it. so meet; and that Henry and Gavin Hardie, Children

6 IVarner Esquire, on account of his Appeal depending " of the deceased Elizabeth Bengo otherwise Hardie,

“ in this Houle, he living in Scotland, or being on Service
“ Wife of James Hardie junior, Merchant in Glasgow,

66 Abroad :"
“ and James Hardie junior, for his own Interest, and as It is ORDERED, That the said John Richardsone may
“ Administrator in Law for his Children, may be re. may enter into a Recognizance for the said Appellant, as
quired to answer the said Appeal :"

desired.
It is ORDERED, That the said Henry and Gavin Hardie,
and the several other Persons last named, may have a

The House being moved, “ That a Day may be ap- Grant et al.
Copy of the said Appeal, and do put in their Answer or

pointed for hearing the Cause, wherein Amelia Charlotte against Grant respective Answers thereunto, in Writing, on or before

Grant and others are Appellants, and Letitia Grant
Monday the 27th Day of March next; and Service of

" and others are Respondents :'
this Order upon the laid Respondents, or upon One of It is ORDERED, That this House will hear the said
their Procurators or Agents in the Court of Session in Cause, by Counsel at the Bar, on the first vacant Day
Scotland, shall be deemed good Service.

for Causés after those already appointed.

et al.

up.”

DIE

Barnewall

meet.

Sir. W. Eliott The House being moved, “ That a Day may be

ap “ tively imported or exported on account of His Maagainst

pointed for hearing the Cause, wherein Sir William “ jesty's Government :" Oliver.

Eliott Baronet is Appellant, and Andrew Oliver is And Also, “ A like Account of Exports and Imports
Respondent:”

“ from and to Spain and Portugal, from the ist of May
It is ORDERED, That this House will hear the faid

“ 1807 to a Period in the said Year corresponding with Cause, by Counsel at the Bar, on the first vacant Day

“ that for which the preceding Account thall be made for Causes, after those already appointed.

And then he withdrew. Scott and Upon reading the Petition of Robert Pierce Gillies,

And the Titles thereof, being read by the Clerk; another

now of Balmakenan, the Son and Heir of Thomas Gillies
against
Gillies.

deceased, and of Colin Gillies Esquire, his Curator or ORDERED, That the said Accounts do lie on the
Guardian, Respondents in a Cause depending in this Table.
House, to which Lieutenant Colonel Hercules Scott and
another are Appellants ; setting forth, “ That the above

ORDERED, That the said Accounts be printed.
“ Appeal, in as far as the Petitioner's Fatherhomas
Gillies was a Party, is abated by his Death; the

Dominus Cancellarius declaravit præsens Parliamen- Adjourn. “ Petitioners therefore pray, That their Lordships will

tum continuandum efle usque ad et in diem Martis, vi-
" be pleased to order that the said Appeal may stand cesimum octavum diem initantis Februarii, horà unde-
“ revived in the Name of the Petitioner the faid cimâ Auroræ, Dominis fic decernentibus.
Robert Pierce Gillies, and of his Curator or Guardian
" the said Colin Gillies, as in the Place and Stead of the
“ faid Thomas Gillies ; and that the Petitioners may have
" the same Benefit of the Answer, and the other Pro-

I E Martis, 28° Februarii 1809.
“ ceedings had on the said Appeal, as the said Thomas
Gillies might have had if in Life :"

Domini tam Spirituales quam Temporales præsentes
It is ORDERED, That the said Appeal do stand re-

fuerunt :
vived in the Name of the Petitioner the said Robert
Pierce Gillies, and of his Curator or Guardian the said Epus. Cicestrien. Dux CUMBERLAND. Ds. Walsingham.

Dux CAMBRIDGE. Ds. Aucklund.
Colin Gillies, as in the Place and Stead of the said Thomas Epus. Fernen, 6.

Dux GLOUCESTER.
Gillies ; and that the Petitioners may have the same

Ds. Hood of Cather.
Benest of the Answer, and the other Proceedings had on

Ds. Eldon, Cancella

ington.

Ds. Redc.dale. the said Appeal, as the said Thomas Gillies might have

rius. had if living, as desired.

Ds. Sheffield.
Comes Stanhope. Ds. Erskine.

Comes Buckingham-
Upon reading the Petition of Mathew Barnewall of the
Peerage, City of Dublin,Esquire, claiming the Titles, Dignities, and

hire. Committee to Honours of Viscount Barnewall of Kingsland, and Baron

Comes Glandore.
of Turvey, in the County of Dublin in Ireland ; setting

Viscount Sydney.
forth, “That the Petitioner delivered in his printed Cafe
ko in relation to his faid Claim, according to their Lord PRAYERS.

ships Standing Order, early in the last Session of Parlia-
" ment: That by their Lordships Order of the 6th Day of The Answer of Henry Raeburn and William Scott Mon Scales and

April 1808 it was ordered, That the Lords Com- crieff to the Appeal of Aiolphus and Andrew Scales, and Brunton “ mittees for Privileges [hould meet to consider the said Robert Brun!on, was this Day brought in : “ Claim on Tuesday the 3d Day of May then next, As was also, The Answer of Alexander Hume Esquire La. Scatorth " and that Notice thereof should be given to His Ma

against jesty's Attorney General : That due Notice of such to the Appeal of Francis Lord Seaforth.

Hume. “ Meeting of the Committee was given to His Majesty's Attorney General , in pursuance of their Lordships Borough of Warwick, in the County of Warwick, Widow; Perico no re

Upon reading the Petition of Elizabeth Laudor of the Laudor's 56 Order, and a copy of the Petitioner's Cafe, including Walter Savage Laudor of Lanthony Abbey, in the County Judges.

a Copy of the Report of His Majesty's Attorney and of Monmouth, Esquire; the Reverend Charles Savage
“ Solicitor Generals for Ireland thereon, were also de- Laudor, Rector of Colton, in the County of Stafford,
« livered to him : That the Petitioner, by his Counsel, Clerk; Henry Ayres Laudor of the Borough of Warwick
“ and also His Majesty's said Attorney General, attended aforesaid, Gentleman ; and the Reverend Robert Ayre
« the House on the said 3d Day of May last ; but from Laudor, Master of Arts, Fellow of Worcester College,
“ the Urgency of more important Matters the Lords Oxford, Clerk; praying Leave to bring in a Bill for the
« Committees for Privileges did not meet on that Day, Purposes in the said Petition mentioned :
« and the Consideration of the Petitioner's Claim was
“ necessarily postponed ; and therefore praying, That

It is ORDERED, That the Consideration of the said
“ their Lordships will be pleased to order, That the Lords Petition be, and is hereby referred to Mr. Baron Thom-
" Committees for Privileges may meet to consider of the son and Mr. Justice Chambre, who are forth with to sum.
“ Petitioner's faid Claim on Tuesday the 21st Day of mon all Parties concerned in the Bill; and, after hearing
Marcb next, or such other Day as their Lordships them, are to report to the House the State of the Cafe,
“ shall be pleased to appoint:"

with their Opinion thereupon, under their Hands; and

whether all Parties, who may be concerned in the Con. It is Ordered, That the Committee for Privileges do sequences of the Bill

, have signed the Petition; and also, meet to consider the said Claim on Thursday the 23d Day that the Judges, having perused the Bill, do sign the of March next; and that Notice thereof be given to His

same. Majesty's Attorney General. Imports and The House being informed, “That Mr. Irving, Inspec- Augustus Berkeley Craven ; praying Leave to bring in Petition re

Upon reading the Petition of the Honourable Henry Craven's Exports be6 tor General of Imports and Exports, attended;"

a Bill for the Purposes in the said Petition mentioned: tween Great

Judges. Britain and He was called in, and delivered at the Bar, pursuant

It is Ordered, That the Confideration of the frid Spain and

to an Order of Friday the 17th Instant ; Portugal,

Petition be, and is hereby referred to the Lord Chief Accounts of “ An Account of the real Value of all Imports into Justice of the Court of Conmon Pleas, and Mr. Justice delivered. " and Exports from Great Britain from and to Spain Bayley, who are forthwith to summon all Parties con

► and Portugal respectively, from the 1st of May 18c8 cerned in the Bill ; and, after hearing them, are to report

to the latelt Period to which the same can be made to the House the State of the Case, with their Opinion
up; distinguishing such Part of the same as was respec. thereupon, under their Hands; and whether all Farties,
VOL. XLVII.

R

who

Raebure and

[ocr errors][merged small]

ferred to

who may be concerned in the Consequences of the Bill, Lawrence, who are forthwith to summon all parties con-
have signed the Petition; and also, that the Judges, hay- cerned in the Bill ; and, after hearing them, are to report
ing perused the Bill, do sign the same.

to the House the State of the Case, with their Opinion

thereupon, under their Hands; and whether all Parties, Busby's et al.

Upon reading the Petition of Edward Sclater Busby who may be concerned in the Consequences of the Bill, Petition re. Esquire, James Salter Esquire and Elizabeth his wife, have signed the Petition ; and also, that the Judges, ferred to

and Edward Augustus Butcher Esquire and Margaret having perused the Bill, do sign the fame. Judges.

his Wife ; praying Leave to bring in a Bill for the Pur-
poses in the said Petition mentioned :

Upon reading the Petition of Katherine Partridge-of Partridges
It is ORDERED, That the Consideration of the said Cromer, in the County of Norfolk, Widow, and Relia Petition re-
Petition be, and is hereby referred to the Lord Chief of Henry Partridge, late of the Middle Temple, London, Surdest
Baron of the Court of Exchequer, and Mr. Baron Wood, Esquire, deceased, on the Part of herself, Henry Samuel
who are forthwith to fummon áll Parties concerned in Partridge of Barwick Hall, in the County of Norfolk,
the Bill; and, after hearing them, are to report to the House Esquire, the eldest Son and Heir at Law of the faid
the State of the Case, with their Opinion thereupon, under Henry

Partridge by the said Katherine, formerly his

Wife

of their Hands; and whether all Parties, who may be con

cerned in the Consequences of the Bill, have signed the the said Henry Samuel Partridge, and for and on the Be: Petition ; and also, that the Judges,

having perused the half of Louisa Katherine Partridge, Henry Champion Par.

tridge, and Charlotte Anne Partridge, the only Children Bill do sign the same.

of the said Henry Samuel Partridge, all of whom are Malling Upon reading the Petition of Peregrine Malangberd Mery Frances the wife of the said Henry Samuel Par

Infants under the Age of Twenty-one Years; and of
tion referred Esquire and Elizabeth Mary Ann his Wife," Thomas
to Judges.
Massingberd Esquire, the Reverend Charles Bozules tridge, Robert Partridge of the City of Norwich, Esquire,

Brother of the said Henry Partridge, on the Behalf of
Massingberd, Elizabeth Massingberd Widow, and Emily
Mässignberd Spinster ; praying
Leave to bring in a Bili, himself and of Robert Partridge his only Son, an Infant

under the Age of Twenty-one Years; the Reverend
for the Purposes in the said Petition mentioned :

John Partridge of Cranwick, in the said County of Nor-
It is ORDERED, That the Consideration of the said folk, another Brother of the said Henry Partridge, Ka-
Petition be, and is hereby referred to Mr. Justice Heath, therine Partridge, and Robert Partridge, as Testamentary
and Mr.Baron Graham, who are forthwith to summon Guardians under the Will of the said Henry Partridge,
all Parties concerned in the Bill; and, after hearing them, of John Anthony Partridge an Infant under the Age
are to report to the House the State of the Case, with of Twenty-one Years, the only other Son of the said
their Opinion thereupon, under their Hands; and whe- Ilenry Partridge; praying Leave to bring in a Bill, for
ther all Parties, who may be concernced in the Conse- the Purposes in the said Petition mentioned :
quences of the Bill, have signed the Petition ; and also,

It is ORDERED, That the Consideration of the said
that the Judges, having perused the Bill, do sign the
same.

Petition be, and is hereby referred to the Lord Chief

Baron of the Court of Exchequer, and Mr. Justice Hutton's Upon reading the Petition of John Hutton of Marske

, cerned' in the Bill ; and, after hearing them, are to report

Bayley, who are forthwith to summon all Parties con.
Petition re in the County of York, Esquire, Matthew Hutton Esquire, to the House the State of the Cafe, with their Opinion
Judges.

and Timothy Hutton of Clifton, in the County of York,
Esquire; praying Leave to bring in a Bill for the Purposes thereupon, under their liands; and whether all Parties,
in the said Petition mentioned :

may

be concerned in the Consequences of the Bill,

have signed the Petition ; and also, that theJudges, having
"It is Ordered, That the Consideration of the said perused the Bill, do sign the same.
Petition be, and is hereby referred to Mr. Justice Grose
and Mr. Justice Chambre, who are forthwith to summon Upon reading the Petition of John Wharton Esquire, Wharton's
all Parties concerned in the Bill; and, after hearing them, and Susan Mary Ann his Wife, James Wharton Esquire, et al. Petition
are to report to the House
the State of the Cafe, with William Wharton Clerk, Robert Wharton Myddleton referred to

Judges
their Opinion thereupon, under their Hands; and whe- Esquire, Richard Wharton Esquire, Thomas Brand Clerk,
ther all Parties, who may be concerned in the Confe- and Deborah his Wife, Margaret Wharton Spinster, and
quences of the Bill, have signed the Petition ; and also Elizabeth Wharton Spinster,

and
that the Judges, having perused the Bill, do sign the Anthony Salvin Esquire, on Behalf of Ann Salvir his
same.

Infant Daughter ; praying Leave to bring in a Bill, for

the Purposes in the said Petition mentioned : Farrers et al. Upon reading the Petition of Farrer Grove Spurgeon It is Ordered, That the Confideration of the said Petition re Farrer of Cold Brayfield, in the County of Buckingham, Petition be, and is hereby referred to Mr. Justice Heath,

Esquire, and John Grove Spurgeon of Lowestoffe, in the and Mr. Baron Wood, who are forthwith to summon all
Judges.

County of Suffolk, Clerk, and Ann his Wife; praying Parties concerned in the Bill; and, after hearing them, are
Leave to bring in a Bill for the Purposes in the said Peti. to report to the House the State of the Case, with their
tion mentioned :

Opinion thereupon, under their Hands; and whether all
It is ORDERED, That the Consideration of the said Parties who may be concerned in the Consequences of
Petition be, and is hereby referred to Mr. Baron Thomson the Bill, have signed the Petition; and also, that the
and Mr. Justice Le Blanc, who are forth with to summon Judges, having perused the Bill, do sign the same.
all Parties concerned in the Bill; and, after hearing them,
are to report to the House the State of the Case, with Upon reading the Petition of the Right Honourable E. Guilford's
their Opinion thereupon, under their Hinds; and whe. Francis Earl of Guildford, and the Honourable Fre- and North's
ther all Parties, who may be concerned in the Conse- derick North of Conduit Street in the Parish of Saint ferred to
quences of the Bill, have signed the Petition ; and also, George, Hanover Square; praying Leave to bring in a Judges.
that the Judges, having perused the Bill, do sign the Bill for the Purposes in the said Petition mentioned :
same.

It is ORDERED, That the Consideration of the said
Moreley's

Petition be, and is hereby referred to Mr. Justice Grose
Upon reading the Petition of John Moseley of Wer and Mr. Baron Graham, who are forthwith to fummon
Petition re. Tofts, in the County of Norfolk, Esquire, on Behalf of all parties concerned in the Bill; and, after hearing them,
ferred to himself and his Infant Sons John Galwey Moseley and
Judges.
William Richard Moseley ; praying Leave to bring in a

are to report to the House the State of the Cale, with
Bill, for the Purposes in the said Petition mentioned :

their Opinion thereupon, under their Hands; and whe

ther all Persons, who may be concerned in the Conse.
It is ORDERED, That the Consideration of the faid quences of the Bill, having signed the Petition; and also,
Petition be, and is hereby referred to the Lord Chief that the Judges, having perused the Bill, do sign the
Justice of the Court of Common Pleas, and Mr. Justice fame.

ferred to

on

Dame

Upon reading the Petition of Dame Jane St. John " and Henry Raeburn and William Scott Moncrieff are J. Millmay's Mildmay, Widow of Sir Henry Paulet St. John Mildmay, Respondents :" et al. Petition

Behalf of herself and her Infant Children, Sir Henry referred to St. John Carew St. John Mildmay, John Clerk Esquire Cause, by Counsel at the Bar, on the first vacant Day

It it ORDERED, That this House will hear the faid
Judges.

and Ann his Wife, George William Ricketts Esquire and for Causes after those already appointed.
Letitia Wife; praying Leave bring a Bill, for
the Purposes in the said Petition mentioned :

The House being moved, " That a Day may be ap. Ld. Seaforth
It is Ordered, That the Consideration of the said. “ pointed for hearing the Cause wherein Francis Lord against

.
Petition be, and is hereby referred to Mr. Baron Thomson Seaforth is Appellant; and Alexander Hume Esquire
and Mr. Justice Chantbre, who are forthwith to summon “ is Respondent :"
all Parties concerned in the Bill; and, after hearing thein,

It is ORDERED, That this House will hear the said
are to report to the House the State of the Cale, with
their Opinion thereupon, under their Hands ; and whe. Cause, by Counsel at the Bar, on the first vacant Day
ther all Parties, who may be concerned in the Conse for Causes after those already appointed.
quences of the Bill, have signed the Petition ; and also,

Hodie 2* vice lečia eft Billa, intituled, “ An Ad Militia Enlistthat the Judges, having perused the Bill, do sign the

to allow a certain Proportion of the Militia in Ire- ment (Ire. fame.

land voluntarily to enlift into His Majesty's Regular land) Liil.

Forces.”
Shirrefs et al. Upon reading the Petition and Appeal of the Re-
againii the
verend Doctor James Shirrefs, one of the Ministers of

ORDERED, That the said Bill be committed to a
Magistrates
of Aberdeen: Aberdeen, Patron of the Incorporated Trades of the Committee of the whole House.
Burgh of Aberdeen, and others, for themselves, Con-

ORDERED, That the House be put into a Committee
veener, Deacons, and representing their respective In-

upon the said Bill To-morrow. corporated Trades ; complaining of Two Interlocutors of the Lord Ordinary in Scotland, of the 4th of July Hodie 2* vice lecta eft Billa, intituled, “ An Ad for Ashbourne 1807, and the rith of March 1808; and also of Three

enlarging the Term and Powers of Two Acts of His Roads Bill. Interlocutors of the Lords of Session there, of the 23d

present Majesty, for repairing the Road from Ash-
and signed the 24th of December 1808, and the ist

« bourne to Sudbury, and from Sudbury to Yoxall Bridge,
aid noth of February 1809; and praying, “ That the “ and from Hatton Moor to Tutbury, in the Counties
“ fame may be reversed, varied, or altered, or that of Derby and Stafford, and for making Two new
“ the Appellants may have such other Relief in the “ Branches of Road to communicate therewith.'
“ Premises, as to this House, in their Lordships great
“ Wisdom, shall seem meet; and that the Magistrates

ORDERED, That the said Bill be committed to the
" and Town Council of the City of Aberdeen may be consideration of the Lords following :
required to answer the said Appeal :”

D.CUMBERLAND. L. Bp. Chichester. L. Walsingham.
It is Ordered, That the said Magistrates and Town E, Stanhope.

L. Hood of Cather.
Council of the City of Aberdeen may have a Copy of E. Buckingham.

ington.

L. Redesdale.
the said Appeal, and do put in their Answer or refpec shire.
tive Answers thereunto, in Writing, on or before Tuesday E. Glandore.

L. Sheffield.

L. Erskine.
the 28th Day of March next; and Service of this
Order upon the said Respondents, or upon any One of
their Procurators or Agents in the Court of Session in Their Lordships, or any Five of them, to meet on
Scotland, shall be deemed good Service.

Thursday next, at Ten o'Clock in the Forenoon,

in the Prince's Lodgings, near the House of Longlands to The House being moved, “ That Thomas Longlands Peers; and to adjourn as they please. enter into Re. “ of Queen Street Westminster, Gentleman, may be percognizance “ mitted to enter into a Recognizance for the Re

Upon reading the Petition of Mary Pemberton, Pembertoa et on it. “ verend Doctor James Shirrefs and others, on account

Thomas Pemberton, Edwin Pemberton, and Benjamin al. against “ of their Appeal depending in this House, they residing Stokes, Executrix and Executors of Samuel Pemberton

Willington, 66 in Scotland :"

deceased, Plaintiffs in a Writ of Error depending in in Error.

this House, wherein Charles Oakes and Thomas Wil'It is Ordered, That the said Thomas Longlands lington are Defendants ; setting forth, “ That the said may enter into a Recognizance for the said Appellants « Samuel Pemberton, and one George Stokes of Old Swinas desired.

ford, in the County of Worcester, Iron Master, did, by

“ Indenture bearing Date on or about the 4th Day of Ewing against The House being moved, “ That a Day may be " January 1802, agree with William Harding, Charles Tipping et

appointed for hearing the Cause, wherein William Oakes, and Thomas Willington, all of Tamworth, in the al. :

Ewing is Appellant, and Thomas Tipping and others Counties of Stafford and Warwick, Bankers and Co.
are Respondents ex parte, the Respondents not having partners, to become Securities for Benjamin Stokes of

put in their Answer thereto, though peremptorily or “ Birmingham, in the County of Warwick, Merchant,
66 dered so to do :"

to the Amount of Twenty thousand Pounds, for PrinIt is ORDERED, That this House will hear the said

“ cipal Money and Interest, lent or to be lent by the faid Cause ex parte, by Counsel at the Bar, on the first va

William Harding, Charles Oakes, and Thomas Willingcant Day for Causes after those already appointed, unless

ton, or the Survivors or Survivor of them, or the

- Executors or Administrators of such Survivor, before
the Respondents put in their Answer thereto, in the
mean Time.

“ the 19th Day of February 1807, to the said Benjamin
Stokes; that the said William Harding died on or about

" the 26th Day of March 1802 ; that on the Death of Sir G. Bro ORDERED, That Charles Pearson do attend this House,

" the said William Harding, Thomas Paget, Joseph Paget, grave's

in order to his being examined as a Witness upon the Divorce Bill.

Thomas Bankhart, and Martha Harding became Part-
Second Reading of the Bill, intituled, “ An Aa to

ners with the said Charles Oakes and Thomas Willington;
“ diffolve the Marriage of Sir George Berney Brograve " that the said Benjamin Stokes kept an open Banking
“ Baronet, with Emma Louisa Brograve his now Wife,

“ Account with the said William Harding, Charles Oakes, “ and to enable him to marry again, and for other Pur

“ and Thomas Willington, up to the Death of the said “ poses therein mentioned.'

William Harding, and continued to keep such open

Banking Account with the said Thomas Paget, Joseph
Scales and The House being moved, “ That a Day may be ap Paget, Thomas Bankhart, Martha Harding, Charles
Brunton
againft Rae-

“ pointed for hearing the Cause, wherein Adolphus and Oakes, and Thomas Willington, from the Death of the burn and

Andrew Scales and Robert Brunton are Appellants, “ faid William Harding to the Month of February 1806; Moncrieff.

u that

V. Sydney.

Oakes and

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

" that in the Month of February 1806, the faid Benjamin ceedings in this Cause: That the Petitioners being deStokes became insolvent, and the said Charles Oakes “ sirous of facilitating the Proceedings in this Cause, so “ and Thomas Willington called on the Petitioners and as that the real Merits might be brought to Iflue, the “ George Stokes to pay the Balance of the said Benjamin “ Petitioners caused another Writ of Error to be issued, Stokes's Banking Account, under the said Deed of the “ for the Purpose of removing the Record of this Cause “ 4th of January 1802, which the said Charles Oakes out of ihe Court of the Exchequer of Pleas to this “ and Thomas Willington represented as amounting to “ House, and accordingly, the Writ of Error on which " the Sum of £19,186. 135. 4d., and threatened, that “ the Record in this Cause has been removed to this “ in case the said Sum of £19,186. 135. 4d. was not “ House, was issued and delivered to the Agent of the “ either immediately paid, or secured to be paid, they “ faid Defendants : That, on or about the ist Day of “ would proceed against the Petitioners and the said “ June 1808, a Motion was made in the said Exchequer - George Stokes at Law; that the Petitioners being very " of Pleas, for the Petitioners to transcribe the said “ much pressed by the said Charles Oakes and Thomas “ Record, but at the same Time the faid Motion was Willington, either to pay the said Sum of £ 19,186. “ made, the said Defendants in Error had not entered the

135. 4d. or to give a Bond for the same, agreed to “ Proceedings on Record, but the Petitioners caused execute a Bond for the Purpose of securing the same, “ the faid Record to be transcribed immediately after

provided the said Bond should not render them liable “ the Proceedings had been entered on the Rolls of s for any Money which they were not liable to pay “ the faid Court of Exchequer of Pleas; that the said 66 under the said Deed of the 4th of January 1852; to “ Defendants in Error did not serve the Order of this “ which the said Charles Cakes and Thomas IVillington “ House, for the Petitioners to aflign Errors before their “confented, and agreed and proposed that an Indorse “Lordships till Eleven o'Clock of the Forenoon of the “ 'ment should be made on the said Bond to that Effect; “ Fourth of July last, and on the fame Day petitioned “ that a Bond, bearing Date the 27th Day of l'ebruary " their Lordships to non-pros the Petitioners Writ of “ 1806, was accordingly prepared, from the Petitioners " Error, with which Petition of the said Defendants their “ and the faid George Stokes, to the said Charles Oakes “ Lordships did not think fit to comply, and on the “ and Thomas Willington, as the surviving Partners of the Meeting of this House permitted the Petitioners to “ said Wiliam Harding, for £40,000, upon which said assign Errors before their Lordships : That the said “ Bond an Indorsement was made, purporting that the “ Defendants in Error applied again to their Lordships " said Bond was given as a collateral Security for the on the 2311 Day of Januay last, to non-pros the “ said Sum of £19,186. 135. 4d. for which the said - Petitioners Writ of Error, when their Loadships were Charles Oakes and Thomas Willington held the said Deed pleased to order the said Errors to be argued before “ of the 4th Day of January 1802: That in Trinity Term “ their Lordships on the 26th of the said Month of fa. “ 1806, the said Charles Oakes and Thomas Willington nuary last: That the Petitioners Proceedings have not “ commenced an Action against the Petitioners on the " in any Part of them been instituted for the Purpose of " said Bond, and laid their Venue in Warwickshire, “ Delay, nor have produced such Delay, but merely for " and obtained a final Judgment in the faid Action “ the Purpose of obtaining Justice in the Premises; and " against the Petitioners therein, in the Michaelmas Term “ forasmuch as the Proceedings of the Petitioners are, as “ following; that the said Charles Oakes and Thomas “ they most humbly submit, regular, and according to Willington never informed the Petitioners that the faid “ the usual Practice of Writs of Error brought into “ Sum of £19,186. 135. 4d. was not a Debt due from “ this House, under the like Circumstances, they most " the said Benjamin Stokes to the said Charles Oakes and “ humbly pray, That the said Writ of Error may be sufThomas Willington, as surviving Partners of the said “ tained by their Lordships, and the former Judgments William Harding, or that the same was a Debt due to “ in this Cause, be reversed :" “ the said Thomas Paget, Joseph Paget, Thomas Bankhart,

It is ORDERED, That the said Petition do lie on the Martha Harding, and I homas Willington, which is the

Table. “ Fact, nor was the Petitioners any ways informed of “ the said Thomas Paget, Joseph Paget, Thomas Bankhart, The House being informed, “ That Mr. Johnson, from London “ and Martha Harding having any Interest therein, till

“the London Dock Company attended;" he was called Dock Com, “ long after they were precluded from pleading in the in, and delivered at the Bar, pursuant to the Directions of pany's Ac“ said Action, unless by Leave of the Court in which an Act of Parliament;

count, &c. “ the same Action was brought ; that the Petitioners

delivered.

“ Report of the Directors of the London Dack Com“ afterwards discovered that Fact, and also discovered

or pany :" " that the said Bond covered the Sum of £4,917.15. uid. “ for which the Petitioners would not have been liable

And also, “ An Account of the Receipts and Difa

“ bursements of the London Dock Company, from the “ to the faid William Harding, Charles Oakes, and Thomas Willington, if the said William Harding had been still

30th of November 1807, to the 30th of November

C 18.8." “ living, and no Person interested in the faid Account

And then he withdrew. “ except the said William Harding, Charles Oakes, and Thomas Willington; that the said George Stokes has given And the Titles thereof, being read by the Clerk; “ to the Petitioners Notice that he will not contribute “ his Proportion of the said Bond, if the Petitioners pay

ORDERED, That the said Report and Account do lie

on the Table. “ the same, without being compelled fo to do by Law: « That when the Petitioners suffered themselves to be “ non-fuited in their Writ of Error in the Exchequer Reading of the Bill, intituled, " "An A&t to dissolve the grave's Hi

The Order of the Day being read for the Second Sir G. Bro6 Chamber, they were ignorant of the said Bond covering any Sum of Money, for which they could not in

“ Marriage of Sir George Berney Brograve Baronet, with vorce Bill “ any Event be liable, to any Person whatsoever, and

Emma Louisa Brograve his now Wife, and to enable 6 the Petitioners had not then discovered the Error in

“ him to marry again, and for other Purposes therein “ the Record in this Cause: That the Petitioners first the same; and for the Lords to be fummoned :

“ mentioned ;” and for hearing Counsel for and against “ brought their Writ of Error, for the Purpose of re“ moving the Record of this Cause into this Honourable ORDERED, That the said Order be discharged. " House, in the Month of November 1806, which was

ORDERED, That the said Bill be read a second Time “ duly notified to the said Defendants in Error on or “ about the 18th Day of said November 1806, but the

on Thursday next; and that Counsel be heard for and " said Defendants in Error never returned the said Writ against the same ; and that the Lords te fummoned. " of Error to be filed, and in the Month of May 1808

The Lord Walfingham reported from the Lords Com- Derwent « applied to the Agent of the Petitioners to cause a mittees, to whoin the Bill

, intituled, “ An Act for amend. Fishery Bill. “ fresh Writ of Error to be issued, in order that they “ might move the Court of Exchequer of Pleas, for

« ing an Act of the Forty-fourth Year of His present “ the Petitioners to transcribe the Record of the Pro

Majesty, for regulating certain Fisheries in the County

“ of Cumberland, and other places therein "nientioned, 5

“ fo

« PreviousContinue »