zance on it.

Attornies, may have a Copy of the faid Appeal, and do stion of Bakers of Perth, on account of their Appeal
put in their Answer or respective Answers thereunto, in “ depending in this House, they living in Scotland :"
Writing, on or before Thursday the 22d Day of Febru,

It is ORDERED, That the said James Chalmer may
ary next; and Service of this Order upon the said Re-
spondents, or upon any of their Counsel or Agents in

enter into a Recognizance for the faid Appellants, as

desired.
the Court of Session in Scotland, shall be deemed good
Service.

Upon reading the Petition and Appeal of the Right E. Traquair
Campbell to
The House being moved, “ That James Campbell of Honourable Charles Earl of Traquair, and of the Ho-exal

againft enter into “ Duke Street, Westminster, Gentleman, may be per- nators of the College of Justice, and Mr. John Anstru,

nourable Charles Hay Mudie of Newton, one of the Se- al.: Recogni

“ mitted to enter into a Recognizance for Mary Re- ther, Advocate, Trustees of the said Earl, complaining
6 becca De la Fontaine Widow, formerly Lashley, on of an Interlocutor of the Lord Ordinary in Scotland, of

account of her Appeal depending in this House, she the 14th of June 1806; and also of Three Interlocutors
“ residing in the Country :"

of the Lords of Session there, of the 23d of May 1806, It is ORDERED, That the said James Campbell may the 18th of May 1808, and the 31st of January 1809; enter into a Recognizance for the said Appellant, as

and praying,

“That the same may be reversed, varied, desired.

or altered, or that the Appellants may have such other

" Relief in the Premises as to this House, in their LordKer against Upon reading the Petition and Appeal of George Ker, ships great Wisdom, shall seem meet; and that Walter E. Moira et

some time Paymaster of the late Regiment of Aberdeen “ Burrows, Robert Cowie, Thomas Afton the younger, , al. :

shire Fencible Infantry, now residing in Aberdeen, com " and John Strother Ancrum, all Merchants in London,
plaining of Two Interlocutors of the Lord Ordinary in

“ and William Walker of Edinburgh, their Attorney,
Scotland, of the 24th of November 1807, and the 5th of may be required to answer the faid Appeal :"
July 1808 ; also of Two Interlocutors of the Lords of
Session there (First Chamber), of the 13th and 30th of the several other Persons last named, may have a Copy

It is ORDERED, That the said Walter Burrows, and
June 1809; and also of an Interlocutor of the Lords of of the faid Appeal, and do put in their' Answer or re-
Session (First Division), of the 14th of December 1809; spective Answers thereunto, in Writing, on or before
and praying,
* or altered, or that the Appellant may have such other Thursday the 22d Day of February next; and Service of
• Relief in the Premises as to this House, in their Lord of their known Counsel or Agents in the Court of Şes-

this Order upon the said Respondents, or upon any one
fhips great Wisdom, shall seem meet ; and that the fion in Scotland, shall be deemed good Service.

Right Honourable Francis Earl of Moira and others, w the Trustees of Colonel Archibald Macneil, may be “ required to answer the said Appeal :"

The House being moved, “ That James Chalmer of Chalmer to « Abingdon Street, Westminster, Gentleman, may be

enter into Re.

perIt is ORDERED, That the said Francis Earl of Moira « mitted to enter into a Recognizance for the Right on it.

cognizance
and others may have a copy of the faid Appeal, and “ Honourable Charles Earl of Traquair and others, on
do put in their Answer or respective Anfwers thereunto, “ Account of their Appeal depending in this House,
in Writing, on or before Thursday the 22d Day of they living in Scotland :">
February next; and Service of this Order upon the said

It is ORDERED, That the said James Chalmer may
Respondents, or upon any of their Counsel or Agents
in the Court of Session in Scotland, shall be deemed

enter into a Recognizance for the faid Appellant, as

desired. good Service. Campbell to The House being moved, “ That James Campbell of

Upon reading the Petition and Appeal of Adam Grieve against Recogni

" Duke Street, Westminster, Gentleman, may be per- Grieve, eldest Son and Heir of Line of the deceased Grieve and
“ mitted to enter into a Recognizance for George Ker, William Grieve, original Leslee of the Lands of Bar. Cunningham.
“ on account of his Appeal depending in this House, laugh, and others, presently residing in Edinburgh, com-
“ he residing in Scotland :”

plaining of Two Interlocutors of the Lords of Session

in Scotland, the First dated the 18th and signed the 25th It is ORDERED, That the said James Campbell may of February 1806, and the Second dated the roth and enter into a Recognizance for the said Appellant, as signed the 11th of March 1807; and praying, “ That desired.

“ the same may be reversed, altered, or varied, in fo

“ far as complained of, or that the Appellant may have
Bakers of Upon reading the Petition and Appeal of the Incor “ fuch other Relief in the Premises as to this House, in
Perth against. poration of Bakers of Perth, complaining of Two In “ their Lordships great Wisdom, shall seem meet; and
Gloag et al. :

terlocutors of the Lord Ordinary in Scotland, of the 30th " that William Grieve and Lieutenant Colonel Francis
of May and 17th of June 1807, and of Two Interlocu “ Cunningham may be required to answer the said
tors of the Lords of Session there, of the 19th of May “ Appeal:”
and 5th of July 1808; and praying, “ That the same

It is ORDERED, That the said William Grieve and
may be reversed, varied, or amended, or that the

Appellants may have such other Relief in the Pre. Lieutenant Colonel Francis Cunningham may have a “ mises as to this House, in their Lordships great Wif.. Copy of the said Appeal, and do put in their Answer or dom, shall seem meet; and that John Gloag and James respective Answers thereunto, in Writing, on or before “ Stewart and others, Members of the Societies in Perth Thursday the 22d Day of February next; and Service “ calling themselves The Perth Wheaten Bread Society, of this Order upon the said Respondents, or upon any " and The New Perth Wheaten Bread Society, may be

one of their respective Counsel or Agents in the Court required to answer the said Appeal :"

of Session in Scotland, shall be deemed good Service. It is ORDERED, That the said George Gloag and James Upon reading the Petition of Adam Grieve, eldest Appellant's

Petition to Stewart and others may have a Copy of the faid Appeal, Son and Heir of Line of the deceased William Grieve,

to profecute and do put in their Answer or respective Answers there- original Lefsee of the Lands of Barlaugh, and others, re- Appeal in unto, in Writing, on or before Thursday the 22d Day siding in Edinburgh, Appellant in a Cause depending in formâ pauof February next; and Service of this Order upon the this House, to which William Grieve and Lieutenant Co- peris. said Respondents, or upon any of their known Counsel lonel Francis Cunningham are Respondents ; setting or Agents in the Court of Seffion in Scotland, shall be forth, " That the Petitioner is very poor (as by the Afdeemed good Service.

66 fidavit and Certificate annexed appears), and conceiv

ing himself aggrieved by certain Interlocutors of the Chalmer to The House being moved, “ That James Chalmer of - Court of Seffion in Scotland; and it appearing to Two enter into Re- « Abingdon Street, Westminster, Gentleman, may be per

“ Counsel there that he hath good and probable Cause cognizance on « mitted to enter into a Recognizance for the Incorpora. is to appeal therefrom (as by another Certificate, also

enter into

zance on it.

o annexed,

“ annexed, appears), he hath appealed therefrom to It is ORDERED, That this House will hear the said
“ their Lordships, but by reason of his Poverty is un- Cause, by Counsel at the Bar, on the first vacant Day for
“ able to prosecute the faid Appeal, unless he shall be Causes after those already appointed.
“ be admitted to do so in forma Pauperis ; and there-
“ fore praying their Lordships will be pleased to order The House being moved, " That a Day may be ap- Richan
“ him to be admitted to prosecute his faid Appeal in pointed for hearing the Caufe, wherein "Captain Wil: against
formå Pauperis :

“ liam Richan is Appellant, and Thomas Gordon is Re. Gordon.

spondent :"
It is ORDERED, That the Petitioner be at Liberty to
prosecute his faid Appeal in formà Pauperis in this House,

It is Ordered, That this House will hear the said
as desired.

Cause, by Counsel at the Bar, on the first vacant Day for

Causes after those already appointed.
Gordon's et Upon reading the Petition of Robert Gordon Esquire
Ux. Petition and Elizabeth Ånne his Wife, praying Leave to bring in

Upon reading the Petition and Appeal of the Honour- Fraser against referred to Judges. a Bill for the Purposes in the said Petition mentioned : able Colonel Archibald Fraser of Lovat, complaining of Chisholm et

Four Interlocutors of the Lords of Session in Scotland, al.
It is Ordered, That the Consideration of the said (First Division) the First dated the 15th, and signed the
Petition be, and is hereby referred to Mr. Justice Heath 17th of November, the 18th of November, and 9th of Dea
and Mr. Baron Graham, who are forthwith to fummon cember 1808, and the 23d of June 1809; and praying,
all Parties concerned in the Bill; and, after hearing

“ That the same may be reversed, varied, or altered, or
them, are to report to the House the State of the Case, « that the Appellant may have such other Relief in the
with their Opinion thereupon, under their Hands; and

« Premises, as to this House, in their Lordships great whether all Parties, who may be concerned in the Con

Wisdom, shall seem meet; and that William Chisholm sequences of the Bill, have signed the Petition ; and also,

« of Chisholm, Alexander Mackenzie of Ord, and John that the Judges, having perused the Bill, do sign the

“ Rose of Ardnagrash, may be required to answer the same.

“ faid Appeal :" Boddington's Upon reading the Petition of Thomas Boddington of It is ORDERED, That the said William Chisholm, Alexa Petition referred to

Hillmorton, in the County of Warwick, Gentleman, ander Mackenzie, and John Rose, may have a Copy of
Judges.

praying Leave to bring in a Bill for the Purposes in the the said Appeal, and do put in their Answer or respective
said Petition mentioned :

Answers thereunto, in Writing, on or before Thursday
It is Ordered, That the Consideration of the said Order upon the said Respondents, or upon any of their

the 22d Day of February next ; and Service of this
Petition be, and is hereby referred to the Lord Chief Counsel or Agents in the Court of Session in Scotland,
Justice of the Court of Common Pleas and Mr. Justice thall be deemed good Service.
Bayley, who are forthwith to summon all Parties con-
cerned in the Bill; and, after hearing them, are to report The Houfe being moved, " That a Day may be ap- Jaffray and
to the House the State of the Case, with their Opinion

“ pointed for hearing the Cross Appeal, wherein Wil. Co. against thereupon, under their Hands; and whether all Parties, who be concerned in the Consequences of the Bill,

“ liam Jaffray and Company, Merchants, are Appel. Scott et al. may have signed the Petition ; and also, that the Judges, « Respondents :"

“ lants, and James Scott and Company and others are having perused the Bill, do sign the same.

It is ORDERED, That this House will hear the said Dame J.Mild. Upon reading the Petition of Dame Jane Saint John Cross Appeal, by Counsel at the Bar, at the same Time may and

Sir, Mildmay of Dogmersfield Park, in the County of South with the original Appeal, wherein James Scott and ComH. Mildmay's

ampton, Widow; and Sir Henry Saint John Carew Saint pany and others are Appellants, and William Jaffray and Petition re

John Mildmay of Shawford House, in the said County of Company, Merchants, are Respondents. Judges. Southampton, Baronet ; praying Leave to bring in a Bill for the purposes in the said Petition mentioned :

The House being moved, “ That a Day may

be

ap. Higgins It is ORDERED, That the Consideration of the said “ pointed for hearing the Cause, wherein John Alexander against Sir

T. Living“ Higgins, Writer to the Signet, is Appellant, and Sir Petition be, and is hereby referred to the Lord Chief Ba

ftone et al. ron of the Court of Exchequer and Mr. Baron Wood,

“ Thomas Livingstone and others are Respondents, ex

parte, the Respondents not having put in their Answer
who are forthwith to summon all parties concerned in
the Bill ; and, after hearing them, are to report to the

“ thereto, though peremptorily ordered so to do:”
House the State of the Case, with their Opinion there. It is ORDERED, That this House will hear the said
upon, under their Hands; and whether all Parties, who Cause, ex parte, by Counsel at the Bar, on the first va-
may be concerned in the Consequences of the Bill, have cant Day for Causes after those already appointed, unless
figned the Petition ; and also, that the Judges, having the Respondents put in their Answer thereto in the mean
perused the Bill, do sign the fame.

Time. E.Caflillis The House being moved, “ That a Day may be ap.

A Petition of the Honourable Henry Wellesley, praying Wellesley for against Patero “ pointed for hearing the Cause, wherein Archibald Earl Leave to bring in a Bill to dissolve his Marriage with a Divorce

Bill : “ of Caffillis is Appellant, and Doctor James Paterson Lady . Charlotte Welleficy his now Wife, and to en“ is Respondent :'

able him to marry again, and for other Purposes therein It is Ordered, That this House will hear the said mentioned, being offered to be presented to the House; Cause, by Counsel at the Bar, on the first vacant Day

The House was informed, “ That John Spinks was for Causes after those already appointed.

« attending."

He was ordered to be called in.
Erskine et al.' The House being moved, “ That a Day may be ap-
against Blane. “ pointed for hearing the Cause, wherein the Honourable

And being called in accordingly, and sworn at the
“ Henry Erskine and others are Appellants, and Andrew
“ Blane Esquire is Refpondent :"

Delivered a Copy of the Proceedings for a Divorce
It is ORDERED, That this House will hear the said

a Mensâ et Thoro, and the Definitive Sentence in the
Caufe, by Counsel at the Bar, on the first vacant Day « Wellesley against Wellesley,” which he said he had ex-

Consiltory Court of the Bishop of London, intituled, for Causes after those already appointed.

amined with the Original; and that the same was a true Ogilvy and The House being moved, “ That a Day may be ap

Copy. Sir D. Wed. « pointed for hearing the Cause, wherein David Ogilvy

And then he withdrew. derburn

« and Sir David Wedderburn Baronet are Appellants, againīt Ogilvy

ORDERED, That the said Proceedings and Sentence et al. “ and IValter Ogilvy and others are Respondents :" do lie on the Table.

ferred to

fon.

Bar;

Bill pre

Then the said Petition was presented, and read. And in the last;

Binns againt

Guppy. Ordered, That Leave be given to bring in a Bili, Jonas Binns is Plaintiff;

and according to the Prayer of the said Petition.

Samuel Guppy Defendant. Accordingly, The Lord Walfingham presented to the sented : House a Bill, intituled, “ An Act to diffolve the Mar Upon reading the Petition of the Prisoners confined Chester “ riage of the Right Honourable Henry Wellesley with for Debt in His Majesty Gaol the Castle of Chester, in Debtors

Petitions. “ the Right Honourable Lady Charlotte Wellesley his now

and for the County of Chester :
« Wife, and to enable him to marry again, and for And also, Upon reading the Petition of the Prisoners
“ other Purposes therein mentioned."

confined for Debt in His Majesty's Northgate Gaol, in

the City of Chester, severally complaining of their DisThe said Bill was read the First Time.

tress, and praying Relief : ORDERED, That the said Bill be read a Second Time on Friday the 9th Day of February next; and that It is Ordered, That the said Petitions do lie on the Notice thereof be affixed on the Doors of this House; Table. and the Lords summoned ; and that the said Henry Wellesley may be heard by his Counsel at the Second Read Ordered, That the Lord Bishop of Bristol be and Bp. Bristol to ing to make out the Truth of the Allegations of the Bill; he is hereby desired to preach before this House, in the preach on

30th Inftant. and that the said Lady Charlotte Wellesley may have a Abbey Church, Westminster, on Tuesday the 30th Day Copy of the Bill; and that Notice be given her of the of this Instant January. said Second Reading; and that she be at Liberty to be heard by her Counsel what she may have to offer against

The Lord Steward reported, “ That the Lords with King's An“ White Staves had (according to Order) presented to

swer

to Ad. the said Bill, at the same Time.

dress.

“ His Majesty the Address of this House of Tuesday last; Wellesley to ORDERED, That the Right Honourable Henry Wel

“ to which His Majesty was pleased to give the following attend.

“ most Gracious Answer:"
lesley do attend this House on Friday the gth Day of
February next, in order to his being examined upon the “ My Lords,
Second Reading of the Bill, intituled, “ An Act to dif “ I thank you for your very loyal and dutiful Ada
“ solve the Marriage of the Right Honourable Henry • dress.
“ Wellesley with the Right Honourable Charlotte Wellesley “ I receive the greatest Satisfaction from the Assurances
“ his now. Wife, and to enable him to marry again, and

you have given Me of your Determination to support
" for other Purposes therein mentioned,” if the House shall “ Me in every Measure which may be necessary for guard-
think fit, whether there has or has not been any Collusion, “ ing the Security of my Dominions, and for defeating
directly or indirectly, on his Part, relative to any A&t of “ the Designs which the inveterate Hostility of the
Adultery that may have been committed by his Wife, “ Enemy continues to direct against the Prosperity of
or whether there be any Collusion, direAly or indirectly, “ this Country."
between him and his Wife, or any other Person or Per.

ORDERED, That the said Address, together with His

or '
Proceedings or Sentence of Divorce had

in the Eccleli. "Majesty's most Gracious Answer thereto, be forthwith
astical Court at his Suit, or touching any Action at Law printed and published.
which may have been brought by him against any Person

The Order of the Day being read for the Lords to be Campaign in
for Criminal Conversation with his the said Henry W'elo
summoned ;

Portugal and lesley's Wife; and also, whether at the Time of the

Spain, MoAdultery of which he complains, his Wife was, by Deed It was moved, “ That an humble Address be presented tions for Ador otherwise by his Consent, living separate and apart “ to His Majesty, That He will be graciously pleased to

dresses for from him, and released by him, as far as in him lies, “ direct, that there be laid before this House, Copies

Papers rea

specting, from her conjugal Duty, or whether she was at the Time “ of all Instructions given to Lord Viscount Wellington, negatived. of such Adultery cohabiting with him, and under the “ for the Conduct of the Campaign in Portugal and Protection and Authority of him as her Husband.

Spain."

Which being objected to ;
Writs of The House being informed, “ That Mr. Alexander
Error de-
“ Macdougall attended, with a Writ of Error from the

After Debate,
livered:
“ Court of Exchequer in Scotland;"

The Question was put thereupon ?
He was called in; and, being sworn and examined,

It was resolved in the Negative.
acquainted their Lordships, “ That he received the said
“ Writ of Error, sealed up, from the Lord Chief Baron

Then it was moved, “ That an humble Address be
" of the Court of Exchequer; and that it is now in the

“ presented to His Majesty, That He will be graciously " fame Condition it was when he received it;" and then

“ pleased to direct, that there be laid before this House, delivered the same at the Bar.

“ Copies of the Dispatches from Lord Wellington, dated

“ Placentia, July the 15th, 1809, and Talavera Le He was directed to withdraw.

“ Regna, July the 24th, 1809." In which Writ of Error,

Which being objected to; Grier et al.

John Grier, George Johnston, and John Porteous, againft Mit. are Plaintiffs,

The Question was put thereupon ?
chell :
and

It was resolved in the Negative.
John Mitchell is Defendant.

Then it was moved, " That an humble Address be
The Lord Ellenborough, Lord Chief Justice of the pleased to dire&t, that there be laid before this House,

“ presented to His Majesty, That He will be graciously
Court of King's Bench, in the usual Manner, delivered

“ Copies of all Dispatches from Lord Viscount Wellington, in at the Table Three Writs of Error;

“ dated Talavera, August ist, 1809." In the First of which,

Which being objected to; Batten

Luke Batten is Plaintiff,
against
and

The Question was put thereupon ?
Johnson :
William Jobnfon Defendant :

It was resolved in the Negative.
In the Second,

Then it was moved, “ That an humble Address be
Batten
Luke Batten is Plaintiff,

“ presented to His Majesty, That He will be graciously
against Camp-
and

“ pleased to direct, that there be laid before this House, bell and

Matthew Campbell and William Johnson are Copies of all Correspondence between His Majesty's
Johnson.
Defendants.

“ Minister in Spain, and Lord Viscount Wellington, on
Vol. XLVII.

6 the

" the Subject of providing Quarters and Provisions for Then an Amendment was proposed to be made to the
" the Army under his Command."

faid Motion, by leaving out (“ Minutes ”) and inserting
Which being objected to ;

p"Sentence.")

The Question was put, “ Whether (“ Minutes ")
The Question was put thereupon ?

es shall stand Part of the Motion ?"
It was resolved in the Negative.

It was resolved in the Negative.
Then it was moved, " That an humble Address be

Then the Question was put, “ Whether (“Sen-
" presented to His Majesty, That He will be graciously

“ tence") shall be there inserted ?"
« pleased to direct, that there be laid before this House,

It was resolved in the Affirmative.
“ Copies of all Correspondence between Lord Viscount
Wellington and the Spanish Government, concerning

Then the said Motion, as amended, was agreed to.
« Provisions for his Army when advancing into Spain.

ORDERED, That an humble Address be presented to
Which being objected to ;

His Majesty, to request, « That His Majesty will be gra

“ ciously pleased to order, that there be laid before this The Question was put thereupon?

6 House, “ The Sentence of the Court Martial held It was resolved in the Negative.

upon Lord Gambier, in consequence of the InformaThen it was moved, “ That an humble Addrefs be

- That an humble Addrefs be « tion given to this House in the last Session of Parlia-
" presented to His Majesty, That He will be graciously “ment, That the Commiffioners for executing the Of-
“ pleased to direct, that there be laid before this Houfe, « fice of Lord High Admiral having judged in expe-
“ Copy of a Letter from Lord Wellington to Malhal 6 dient that the Lord Gambier, Admiral of the Blue
“ Beresford, 57th July."

Squadron of His Majesty's Fleet, should be tried by a
Which being objected to ;

“ Court Martial, to be held at Portsmouth on Monday

6 the 19th Day of June 1809, for enquiring into his The Question was put thereupon?

“ Conduct as Commander in Chief of the Channel Fleet It was resolved in the Negative.

employed in Basque Roads between the 17th Day of

“ March and the 29th Day of April 1809."
Then it was moved, “ That an humble Address be

presented to His Majefty, That He will be graciously ORDERED, That the said Address be presented to His
“ pleased to direct, that there be laid before this House, Majesty by the Lords with White Staves.
“ Copy of a Letter from Lord Wellington to General
O'Donaghue, to send Troops to Puesta da Barcos.” ORDERED, That all the Lords be summoned to attend Lords fum.

moned.
the Service of the House To-morrow.
Which being objected to ;

ORDERED, That all the Lords be fummoned to attend
The Question was put thereupon?

the Service of the House on Monday next.
It was resolved in the Negative.
Then it was moved, “ That an humble Address be the Service of the House on Thursday next.

ORDERED, That all the Lords be fummoned to attend
presented to His Majesty, That He will be graciously
“ pleased to direct, that there be laid before this House,

Dominus Cancelarius declaravit" præfens Parliamen- Adjours,
• Copy of General O'Donoghue's Letter, announcing tửm continuándúin "elle ufque åd et in diem Veneris,
.General Cuesta's Intention of leaving Talavera."

vicefimum fextum diem instantis Januarii, horà unde-
Which being objected to ;

cima Auroræ, Dominis fic decernentibus.
The Question was put thereupon ?
It was refolved in the Negative.

IE Veneris, 26° Januarii 1810.
Then it was moved, “ That an humble Address be
« presented to His Majesty, 'That He will be graciously Domini tam Spirituales quam Temporales præsentes
“ pleased to direct, that there be laid before this House,

fuerunt :
“ Copies of Two Letters from Lord Wellington, 21st
August from Truxillo.”

Archiep. Cantuar. Dux CUMBERLAND. Ds. Wellesley, Unus
Dux CAMBRIDGE.

Primariorum Secre.
Which being objected to ;
Epus. Wigorn.

tariorum.
Epus. Exon.

Ds. Eldon, Cancel
The Question was put thereupon ?

Epus. Sarum.

larius.

Ds. De Clifford. It was resolved in the Negative.

Epus. Norvičen.

Ds. St. John of Bletfor.

Comes Camden,
Then it was moved, “ That an humble Address be Epus. Hereford.

Præfes.

Ds. Sinclair.
presented to His Majesty, That He will be graciously Epus. Brisol

.
pleased to direct, that there be laid before this House, Epus. Roffen. Comes Weftmorland,

Ds. Napier.

Ds. Dutton.
« Copy of a Letter from Lord Wellington to the Spanish Epus. Kilmoren. C. P. S.
“ Government, complaining of Want of Provisions, re- Epus. Clogberen.

Dux Somerset. Ds. Ponsonby
" ferred to in the Letter aforesaid.”

Dux Beaufort. Ds. Scarsdale.
Which being objected to;

Dux Bedford.

Ds. Holland.
Dux Rutland.

Ds. Brownlow.
The Question was put thereupon ?

Ds. Rivers.
It was resolved in the Negative.

March. Lansdowne.
March. Stafford.
March. Bath.

Ds. Walsinghan. Sentence of It was moved, “ That an humble Address be pre

Ds. Eliot. Court Mar. “ sented to His Majesty to request, That His Majesty

Comes Aylesford, Se- ' Ds. Boringdon. tial on Ld. “ will be graciously pleased to order, that there be lạid

nescallus. Gambier,

Ds. Montagu. “ before this House, the Minutes of the Court Martial Address for “ held upon Lord Gambier, in consequence of the In

Comes Pembroke &

Ds. Heathfield. “ formation given to this House in the last Session of

Montgomery.

Ds. Kenyon.

Ds. Verulam. “ Parliament, That the Commissioners for executing

Comes Suffolk &

Ds. Grenville. " the Office of Lord High Admiral having judged it ex

Berkshire. “ pedient that the Lord Gambier, Admiral of the Blue

Comes Bridgewater.

Ds. Douglas of Loch

leven. “ Squadron of His Majesty's Fleet, should be tried by a

Comes Northampton. “ Court Martial, to be held at Portsmouth on Monday

Comes Lindsey.

Ds. Upper Offory. " the 19th Day of June 1809, for enquiring into his

Comes Winchilfea &

Ds. Mulgrave. “ Conduct as Commander in Chief of the Channel Fleet

Nottingham.

Ds. Tarborough. “ employed in Basque Roads, between the 17th Day

Comes Sandwich.

.. Ds. Bayning.

Ds. Bolton. “ of March and the 29th Day of April 1809."

DIE

Ds. Clifton.

Ds. Hay.

Ds. Foley.

Comes Elex.

Comes Abingdon.

Ds. Wodehouse. to put in any Answer to this Appeal; the Petitioner
Comes Albemarle. Ds. Lilford.

" therefore prayed their Lordships further Order on the
Comes Jersey
Ds. Carysfort.

• Respondent to put in his Answer to the said Appeal, and
Comes Horne.

Ds. St. Helens. “ their Lordships were thereupon pleased to order the said
Comes Strathmore. Ds. Redesdale. os Respondent to put in his answer to the faid Appeal on
Comes Aberdeen. Ds. Arden.

or before the 23d Day of February last; that the Re-
Comes Glasgow.
Ds. Sheffield.

“ fpondent has not as yet put in any Answer to this Ap-
Comes Macclesfield. Ds. Erskine.

“ peal; and therefore praying their Lordships further
Comes Pomfret.

Ds. Lauderdale. « Order for the Respondent to put in his Answer to
Comes Brooke & Ds. Ponsonby of Imo. “ this Appeal within such limited Time as to their Lord.
Warwick.
killy.

" ships fhall seem meet :"
Comes Harcourt. Ds. Gambier:

It is ORDERED, That the said Respondent do put in
Comes Ilchester.

his Answer thereunto, in Writing, on or before Friday
Comes Radnor.

the 23d Day of February next.
Comes Spencer.
Comes Bathurst.

Upon reading the Petition and Appeal of Charles Selk. Selkrig
Comes Hillsborough.
Comes Grosvenor.
rig, Accountant in Edinburgh, Trustee for the Creditors againšt Davis

et al: of Adam and Thomas Fairholmes, late Merchant in Comes Mount Edge

Edinburgh, complaining of Three Interlocutors of the
cumbe.

Lords of Session in Scotland, the First dated the 20th,
Comes Digby

and signed the 21st of November 1804"; the Second
Comes Liverpool.

dated the 20th, and signed the 22d of November 1805; Comes Long ford.

and the Third dated the 3d, and signed the 7th of June Comes Rosslyn.

1808 ; and also of an Interlocutor of the Lord Ordinary Comes Chichester.

there, of the 30th of May 1809; and praying, " That Comes Limerick.

“ the same may be reversed, varied, or altered, in so far Comes Clancarty.

as complained of, or that the Appellant may have Comes Powis.

“ such other Relief in the Premises, as to this House, in Comes Roffe.

“ their Lordships great Wisdom, shall seem meet; and Comes Grey.

" that Messieurs William Davies and John Stevenson Salt, Comes Harrowby.

“ and the Carron Company, may be required to answer Viscount Falmouth.

" the said Appeal :"
Viscount Wentworth.

It is ORDERED, That the said Messieurs William Dar
Viscount Sydney

vies and John Stevenson Salt, and the Carron Company,
Viscount Mountjoy.

may have a copy of the said Appeal, and do put in their
Viscount Sidmouth.

Answer or respective Answers thereunto, in Writing, on
Viscount Lake.

or before Friday the 23d Day of February next; and

Service of this Order upon the said Respondents, or
PRAYERS.

upon any one of their known Counsel or Agents in the Bakers of

The Answer of John Gloag, James Stewart, and others, Court of Session in Scotland, shall be deemed good Service.
Perth againft to the Appeal of the Incorporation of Bakers of Perth,
Gloag et al.
was this Day brought in.

The House being moved, “That James Campbell, of Campbell to “ Duke Street, Westminster, Gentleman, may be per

enter into Thomson As was also the Answer of Peter Clark and others to

Recogni

" mitted to enter into a Recognizance for Charles Selkagainst Clark the Appeal of James Thomson, Merchant in Glasgow.

zance on it. “ rig, Accountant in Edinburgh, on account of his

“ Appeal depending in this House, he living in Scotland: "' Bp. Kilmore This Day George Lord Bishop of Kilmore took the takes the

Oaths, and made and subscribed the Oath of Abjuration, It is Ordered, That the said James Campbell may Oaths. pursuant to the Statutes.

enter into a Recognizance for the faid Appellant, as

desired. Haynes Upon reading the Petition of JohnWhitebead, Matthew against

Howard, and John Haddock, Defendants in a Writ of The House being moved, " That a Day may be ap- Thomson Whitehead et al; Error depending in this House, wherein Thomas Haynes pointed for hearing the Cause, wherein James Thom. againft Clark

is Plaintiff ; setting forth, “ That the Plaintiff in Error son, Merchant in Glasgow, is Appellant, and Peter et al.
,,“ hath not assigned Errors within the Time limited by « Clark and others are Respondents :"
}" their Lordships Standing Order ; and therefore pray-

It is ORDERED, That this House will hear the said
“ing their Lordships, That the said Writ of Error may cause, by Counsel at the Bar, on the first vacant Day for
4, be non-prosd, with such Costs as to their Lordships Causes after those already appointed.

" shall seem meet :" Writ of It is ORDERED, That the Petitioners do forth with

The House being moved, “ That a Day may be ap- Constable and Error non. enter a Non-pros on the said Writ of Error, as desired; “ pointed for hearing the Cause, wherein Archibald Co. against profs'd with

and that the Record be remitted to the Court of King's « Constable and Company are Appellants, and Mrs. Wright et al. Colts.

Bench, to the end Execution may be had upon the Judg. Wright Widow and others are Respondents :"
ment given by that Court, as if no such Writ of Error

It is ORDERED, That this House will hear the said
had been brought into this House; and further, that the
Plaintiff in Error do pay, or cause to be paid to the De Cause, by Counsel at the Bar, on the first vacant Day
fendants in Error, the Sum of Forty Pounds for their for Causes after those already appointed.
Costs, by reason of the Delay of the Execution of the
said Judgment.

The House being moved, “ That a Day may be ap- Moore et al,

“ pointed for hearing the Cause, wherein Benjamin against Steel, Lyell against Upon reading the Petition of George Lyell of Kinneff, “ Moore and others are Appellants, and Elizabeth Steel Gilchrift.

Appellant in a Cause depending in this House, to which “ is Respondent :"
Ebenezer Gilchrist, Manager of the British Linen Com It is ORDERED, That this House will hear the said
pany, is Respondent ; setting forth, " That the Petitioner Cause, by Counsel at the Bar, on the first vacant Day for

presented his Petition' to their Lordships on the 26th Causes after those already appointed.
“ Day of January last, setting forth, That he had ex-
“ hibited his Appeal to their Lordships on the 27th Day

The House being moved, “ That a Day may be ap- Bakers of
“ of January 1808, and that their Lordships Order “ pointed for hearing the Cause, wherein the Incorpora. Perth against
" thereon had been duly served on the Respondent's “ tion of Bakers of Perth aré Appellants, and John Gloag et al.
“ Agent in Scotland, but that the Respondent had not “ Gloag, James Stewart, and others, are Respondents :"

et al.