Making a Medical Living: Doctors and Patients in the English Market for Medicine, 1720-1911

Front Cover
Cambridge University Press, Jun 6, 2002 - Medical - 372 pages
How did doctors make a living? Making a Medical Living explores the neglected socio-economic history of medical practice, beginning with the first voluntary hospital in 1720 and ending with national health insurance in 1911. It looks at private practice and how this was supplemented by public appointments. In this innovative study, Anne Digby makes use of new archival sources of information to produce a compelling picture of ordinary rather than elite doctors, and of the dynamics of provincial rather than metropolitan practice. From the mid-eighteenth century doctors travelled to see ordinary patients, developed specialisms and expanded institutions. Despite limitations in treatment, doctors raised demand for their services as illuminating case studies of women, children, the poor and the affluent show. But doctors did not limit their own numbers, and were largely unsuccessful in restricting competition from other practitioners, with the significant exception of women. Consequently, many GPs struggled to make a living by seeing numerous patients at low fees. Doctors' entrepreneurial activity thus helped shape English medicine into a distinctive pattern of general and specialist practice, and of public and private health care.
 

Contents

Medical practitioners
11
The context of practice
39
Medical encounters
69
The economic dimensions of practice
105
The creation of a surgical general practice
107
The GP and the goal of prosperity
135
Physicians
170
Patients and doctors
197
Office altruism and poor patients
224
Expanding practice with women and child patients
254
Synthesis
297
Reflections
299
Select bibliography
317
Index of medical names
338
General index
341
Copyright

Medicalisation and affluent patients
199

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page xv - Fortunately, the Institute for Research in the Social Sciences at the University of North Carolina has embarked on a large study of many of these content and methodological problems.

Bibliographic information