 ... orders, the purchaser could only have recourse to the person who actually sold the horse, and the owner would not be liable on the warranty, because the servant was not acting within the scope of his employment...  The Law of Contracts - Page 60by Theophilus Parsons - 1866Full view - About this book
 | Great Britain. Court of King's Bench, Charles Durnford - Law reports, digests, etc - 1817 - 860 pages
...between the master and servant ; servant(rt): but if the owner of a horse were to send a stranger 1790. to a fair with express directions not to warrant the horse, and the latter acted contrary to the^rders, the purchaser could only agaiiat have recourse to the person who actually sold the horse,... | |
 | George Long - Sales - 1821 - 294 pages
...to be Cognizant of any private conversation between the master and servant ; but if the owner of a horse were to send a stranger to a fair, with express...be liable on the warranty, because the servant was not acting within the scope of his employment (n)." And in a subsequent case at Nisi Prius before Lord... | |
 | Vermont. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1824 - 506 pages
...be cognizant of any pi ivate conversation between the master and the servant ; but if the owner of a horse were to send a stranger to a fair, with express...directions not to warrant the horse, and the latter acted contrarv to the orders, the purchaser could only Imve recourse to the person who actually sold the... | |
 | Samuel Comyn - Contracts - 1824 - 680 pages
...express direction* not to warrant the horse, and the latter act contrary to the orders, the purchaser can only have recourse to the person who actually sold the horse, and the owner is not liable on the warranty, (f) In the absence of particular instructions, however, a general power... | |
 | Charles Petersdorff - Law - 1831 - 590 pages
...Il.irrison, 3 TR 757. But it the owner of a horse were to senda stranger lo :i fair with express direc lionf not to warrant the horse, and the latter acted contrary...recourse to the person who actually sold the horse, and ihe owner would not be liable on the warranty, because the servant was not acting within ihc scope... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1855 - 980 pages
...to be cognizant of any private conversation between the master and servant; but if the owner of the horse were to send a stranger to a fair with express...warrant the horse, and the latter acted contrary to the order, the purchaser could only have recourse to the person who actually sold the horse, and the owner... | |
 | South Carolina. Court of Appeals, William Randolph Hill - Law reports, digests, etc - 1834 - 498 pages
...supposed to be cognizant of any private conversation between the master and servant: but if the owner of a horse were to send a stranger to a fair with express...be liable on the warranty, because the servant was not acting in the scope of his employment." It does not appear that the plaintiff was the general agent... | |
 | Joseph Chitty - Contracts - 1834 - 850 pages
...supposed to be cognizant of any private conversation between the master and servant. But if the owner of a horse were to send a stranger to a fair, with express...be liable on the warranty, because the servant was not acting within the scope of his employment (I). So if a servant has been allowed by his master to... | |
 | Jacob D. Wheeler - Common law - 1836 - 644 pages
...the servant was acting within the general scope of his authority. Again he says, if the owner of a horse were to send a stranger to a fair, with express...purchaser could only have recourse to the person who sold the horse, and the owner would not be liable on the warranty ; because, the servant was not acting... | |
| |
