AN ESSAY ON MAN, In Four Epistles TO HENRY ST. JOHN, LORD BOLINGBROKE. THE DESIGN. HAVING proposed to write some pieces on human life and manners, such as (to use my lord Bacon's expression) 'come home to men's business and bosoms,' I thought it more satisfactory to begin with considering man in the abstract, his nature and his state: since, to prove any moral duty, to enforce any moral precept, or to examine the perfection or imperfection of any creature whatsoever, it is necessary, first, to know what condition and relation it is placed in, and what is the proper end and purpose of its being. The science of human nature is, like all other sciences, reduced to a few clear points: there are not many certain truths in this world. It is therefore in the anatomy of the mind as in that of the body; more good will accrue to mankind by attending to the large, open, and perceptible parts, than by studying too much such finer nerves and vessels, the conformations and uses of which will for ever escape our observation. The disputes are all upon these last; and I will venture to say, they have less sharpened the wits than the hearts of men against each other, and have diminished the practice more than advanced the theory of morality. If I could flatter myself that this Essay has any merit, it is in steering betwixt the extremes of doctrines, seemingly opposite, in passing over terms utterly unintelligible, and in forming a temperate, yet not inconsistent, and a short, yet not imperfect, system, of ethics. This I might have done in prose: but I chose verse, and even rhyme, for two reasons. The one will appear obvious; that principles, maxims, or precepts so written, both strike the reader more strongly at first, and are more easily retained by him afterwards: the other may seem odd, but it is true; I found I could express them more shortly this way than in prose itself; and nothing is more certain, than that much of the force, as well as the grace of arguments or instructions, depends on their conciseness. I was VOL. II B 2 unable to treat this part of my subject more in detail, without becoming dry and tedious; or more poetically, without sacrificing perspicuity to ornament, without wandering from the precision, or breaking the chain of reasoning: if any man can unite all these without diminution of any of them, I freely confess he will compass a thing above my capacity. What is now published, is only to be considered as a general map of man, marking out no more than the greater parts, their extent, their limits, and their connexion, but leaving the particular to be more fully delineated in the charts which are to follow. Conse quently, these Epistles in their progress (if I have health and lei. sure to make any progress) will be less dry and more susceptible of poetical ornament. I am here only opening the fountains, and clearing the passage To deduce the rivers, to follow them in their course, and to observe their effects, may be a task more agreeable. AN ESSAY ON MAN. ARGUMENT OF EPISTLE I. OF THE NATURE AND STATE OF MAN WITH RESPECT TO Of man in the abstract. I. That we can judge only with regard 1 12 gance, madness and pride of such a desire. ver. 250, X. The consequence of all the absolute submission due to Providence both as to our present and future state, ver. 281, to the end. EPISTLE I. AWAKE, my St. John! leave all meaner things 10 A wild, where weeds and flowers promiscuous shoot Or, gardens tempting with forbidden fruit. Together let us beat this ample field, Try what the open, what the covert yield: The latent tracts,the giddy heights, explore Of all who blindly creep, or sightless soar; Eye nature's walks, shoot folly as it flies, And catch the manners living as they rise; Laugh where we must, be candid where we can, But vindicate the ways of God to man. I. Say first, of God above, or man below, What can we reason, but from what we know? Of man, what see we but his station here, From which to reason, or to which refer? 20 Through worlds unnumber'd though the God be known, 'Tis ours to trace him only in our own. He who through vast immensity can pierce, May tell why heaven has made us as we are. Look'd through? or can a part contain the whole? 30 II. Presumptuous man! the reason wouldst thou find, Why form'd so weak, so little, and so blind? First, if thou canst, the harder reason guess, Of systems possible, if 'tis confess'd, In human works, though laboured on with pain, .C 40 50 |