Page images
PDF
EPUB

twelve or fourteen marks, being so great a cure; so that of his pension he is not able to buy books, nor give his neighbour drink, all the great gain goeth another way-A redress God grant!" The same collectors record similar complaints made in a popular publication of that day, called "The Supplication of the Beggars."

den; and by that of another person of still more elevated character, the ornament of his age and country! whose voice when not perverted by passions or interests of his own, was the voice of reason and philosophy itself! the great lord Bacon. The former expresses himself thus: "I doubt not but that every good man wishes that, at our dissolution, their land" Your pretence to put down the abbeys, and tithes, and churches, had been bestowed rather for the advancement of the church to a better maintenance of a labouring, deserving ministry, relief of the poor, and other such good uses (as have in them a character of the good wishes of those who first dedicated them to God), than conferred, with such a prodigal dispensation, on those who stood ready to devour what was sanctified." The latter thus: "It were to be wished, that impropriations were returned to the church as the most natural and proper endowments. In mine own opinion and sense, I must confess, (I speak it with all reverence), all the parliaments since the the 27th and 31st of Henry 8th, which gave away the impropriations, seem to me to stand, in a sort, obnoxious to God, in conscience to do somewhat for the church, and to bring the patrimony thereof back to a due competency." May I presume, with all humility, to impress these memorable words upon the recollection of the House! Till that is done, which, lord Bacon says, "ought in the conscience of parliament to be done," all legislative provisions, I fear, can be mere temporary palliatives, and no better.

The truth is, that king Henry 8th put the matter of the church establishment into such a state, that without some for cible interposition of parliament, it is become remediless in all time coming. The poverty-struck condition of the clergy, at that period, is recorded in a hundred striking instances, by Strype, by Kennet, by Wharton, and other collectors. The venerable Latimer, in a sermon preached before king Edward, says, "We of the clergy had too much, but that is taken away, and now we have too little; for my own part I have sufficient, God is my judge, I crave nothing of any man, but I know them that have too little; there lieth a great matter by these appropriations, great reformation is to be had in them; I know where there is a great market town with divers hamlets and inhabitants, where do rise yearly of their labour to the value of 501. and the vicar that serveth hath but

was to put away what was amiss: it was amiss, that a great part of their land was spent on a few superstitious monks, who gave not 40l. alms, when they should have given 2007.: it was amiss, that monks should have benefices, and preach once a year to them that paid their tithes of the parsonage: it was amiss, that scarcely among twenty they set one sufficient vicar to preach. But see now how that was amiss, is amended-marry as the devil amended his dame's leg; when he should have set it right, he broke it in pieces. The monks gave little alims, and set unable men in their benefices; but now where 20l. was given to the poor, in more than a hundred places, not one meal's meat is given; that's a fair amendment. Where they had always one or other vicar to preach, now no vicar at all, but the farmer is vicar and parson altogether, and only a castaway monk or friar, which can hardly say matins, is hired for twenty of thirty shillings, and meat and drink, yea, in some places, for meat and drink only. I know, and twenty thousand more men know, more than five thousand benefices thus well and gospelly served." The fact of the reduced condition of the clergy is admitted by the legislature itself, not only by the acts of shortly afterwards passing the statutes of Union of Benefices, and of Dilapidation (which for the first time found their way into our municipal code, from a necessity then first emerging in any pressing degree), but it is expressly recorded in the preamble of these statutes, lamenting "the decay of parsonage houses, and the insufficiency of single benefices for the maintenance of a minister."

[merged small][merged small][ocr errors]

have aided the operation of this charity; the two lowest classes have all received an actual augmentation from it; and a third class is now receiving the same be

I take it most thankfully; for the saying of St. Paul, that they who would grow rich fall into temptation-I fear it is not half so much as stark beggary: and if I knew any bishop that were covetous, Inefit; but by a paper from the secretary would surely admonish him; but I know none but all very beggars, except it be one, and yet I dare well say, he is not over rich!" The general condition of churchmen at that time affords a solution natural enough of that otherwise extraordinary fact, of their general and hasty relapse into the ancient superstition.

of that board, which I hold in my hand, it appears, that " if we compute the number of livings under 50l. per annum to be as above about 6,000, a moiety of which were actually under 30l. per annum; and if we reckon that they have been since improved by the governors, and by other means, upon an average two-thirds, which is a very liberal allowance indeed, it follows that there are now 6,000 livings in England and Wales, that do not exceed upon an average 85l. per annum, and that a very great proportion of them are, at this time, not 30l. per annum, and so progressively from 30l. to 40%. and from 401. and 50l." In a document with which I am favoured by Mr. Archdeacon Plymley of Salop, I am informed, "that of 186 churches in that archdeaconry, (which, as he justly observes, comprehends a part of five different counties, and has within it specimens of almost every natural and artificial situation), 109 only have any parson

Succeeding times have provided nothing like a sufficient remedy. On a complaint made to king Charles 1st by parliament against non-residents, he answered them, "He recommended to this House to make due provision, that every parish should allow a competent maintenance for an able minister;" and it was upon that occasion well observed in the House, "that scandalous livings made scandalous ministers." From that time nothing was done till the splendid benefaction of the first fruits and tenths made by queen Anne; on which occasion her majesty observed, "that she had taken into her princely consideration the mean and in-age house. Independent of this deficiency of sufficient maintenance belonging to the clergy in divers parts of this kingdom;" and the parliament in the preamble to the act, recites, "that a sufficient settled provision for the clergy, in many parts of this kingdom hath never yet been made." This fund has now been in operation for near a century, under the administration of a board composed of persons of high station, both in church and state. The number of livings returned, certified to this board and to the Exchequer, were not exceeding

[merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small]

fifty-nine parsonage houses, many of those in existence are totally unfit for the residepce of any clergyman's family; fortyseven churches have no glebe land. Where there is a house, or land to build one upon, the want of a sufficient residence would be an excuse if the livings could afford money to repair or to build: but twenty-seven churches, exclusive of those that are subordinate churches, and which for the most part have no independent income, have from 21. 5s. a year only to 50l. a year: no living would remain so low as 21. 5s. a year, if the patrons would accept of augmentation from queen Anne's bounty; but this is declined for fear of putting them under the bishop's jurisdiction. Of the livings, twenty-seven are under 50l.; thirty-three above 50%. but under 100.; twenty-three above 100/ but under 150l.; twenty-four above 150l. but under 2001. per annum: there are but nineteeen livings of the whole hundred and sixty-eight that are above 200l. per annum; and this in a country in which the ecclesiastical state is conceived to be much more respectable than in the average state of the kingdom.

In adverting to this subject, I just venture to remark, that in a publication of an hon. baronet, upon the revenues of the [21]

Debate in the Commons on the

[484

kingdom (whom I do not see in his which belong to the crown, amounting to place), it is stated, "that the revenue of near eleven hundred), either belong to this charity of queen Anne's bounty, at various lay corporations (for even colleges first amounted to about 14,000l. per annum; and on the 1st of January 1735, the possess near 6,000 of the whole number, are such), or to lay individuals, who alone governors of that charity possessed Now, sir, in this state of things, I desire besides from savings and private benefac- to ask, upon what ground I can be called tions, the sum of 152,500l. of old South Sea upon to give up half the living, the annuities, and 4,8577. of cash in the hands advowson of which I have purchased, of their treasurer; the state of that fund upon a price relative to its value, in order has of late years been carefully con- that that moiety may be transferred to cealed, but it probably yields at present improve another living, belonging to anofrom 40 to 50,000l. per annum. hon. baronet will, I am sure, thank me for moiety, and who has no other title to it, The ther patron, who has paid nothing for that using the present opportunity of correct but that he happens to possess the ading such a misapprehension. It is per- vowson of a smaller living? I see no fectly true, that such a sum existed in the ground, except such an one as would jusfunds in the year 1735; but it is equally tify the legislature, in taking away half of true, that this was a sum fully appropriated any other estate I had purchased, in order to a great number of livings, to which it to give it to my neighbour, because he was paying a money interest till proper pur- happened to have less. Let gentlemen chases of land could be found; and where- consider the effect of such speculations! ever there is a surplus of such interest, it In the next place, suppose that this was is made principal, and is applied in a accomplished in a way consistent with the similar manner. Its present income is, rights of property, what would follow? with very slight accidental variations, the Equalize all the clergy, and you in effect same as its original income, between degrade them all; for it is the grossest of 14,000l. and 15,000l. per annum. would be difficult, indeed to conceive any England is amply endowed. It is demoniIt all mistakes, that the parochial church of reason for an idle unproductive accumu-strated by a very exact inquirer upon lation of the money of this charity, to the these subjects, Mr. Cove, that if even all prejudice of its present numerous objects; the preferments, of every species, bethough, if any such practice could exist, longing to the church of England, were I certainly should not be much surprised moulded into one common mass, and at the careful concealment of it. of the hierarchy was dissolved (a matter thence distributed, if the venerable fabric not to be effected without a convulsion and laceration of the civil state of the country, of which no man can foretell the consequences), and its funds parcelled out amongst the parochial clergy, the maximum of an English benefice would be not more than 1677, a-year, an income by no means adequate, in the present state of the world, to the demands which society makes upon that profession in point of education, of attainments, of manners, of general appearance in life. As the revenues at present are distributed, the clergy, as a profession, find an easy and independent access to every gradation of society, and maintain a fair equality, as they ought to do, with the other liberal professions; and the elevation of the highest ranks give something of a dignity to the lowest : alter the mode of distribution, and you run the risk of producing a body of clergy, resembling only the lower orders of society, in their conversation, in their manners, and their habits; and it is

To the mischiefs arising from the extreme poverty of many parochial benefices, I have heard it suggested in this House as a cure, that there should be an equalization. Equality is in these days the grand panacea for all disorders. Unfortunately, besides twenty other objections, arising from the general interests of the civil and religious policy of the country, there are two objections that seem to dispose of it completely: one is, that it could not be effected without a most enormous plunder of the laity; and the other, that if done, it would not answer the purpose for which it is intended. In the first place advowsons, though originally perhaps mere trusts, are now become lay-fees. They are bought and sold, and are lay property, just as much as any other tenements or hereditaments. And they are not merely lay property in law, but a very large proportion of them is so in fact; for of the 11,600 livings in this kingdom, 2,500 may be in ecclesiastical patronage, the rest (exclusive of those

well, if they are not infected by a popular | fondness for some or other species of a gross, a factious, and a fanatical religion. An invidious parallel is sometimes stated, between the sister churches of England and Scotland, upon this matter, and particularly upon the opinion of Dr. Adam Smith, to the disadvantage of the former. With all respect to the talents of a very acute and accomplished person, I am disposed to stop a little short of an unlimited subscription to his opinions, on many subjects, and particularly upon the subject of the English church, and the English universities; both of which I have had means of knowing, in conse quence of causes from which I can claim no merit, in a mode of personal observation and experience, which that eminent person never possessed. Sir, when I consider the extraordinary men which the church of Scotland has produced, (quales viros Caledonia emiserit) if I may use the words of Tacitus respecting their ancestors,) I cannot help adverting to the circumstances, that their harvest of literature has been principally produced within the last thirty or forty years; within which time, I understand, a more liberal provision has, by the authority of the courts of justice, been made for their clergy. Sir, I presume that I state a fact that is generally admitted, that from the Revolution downwards till that time, the clergy of Scotland had not taken a distinguished share in the literary occupations of Europe, even in those of a the ological nature. They have amply paid up their arrears, and their country has, in part at least, paid up its arrears to them, of a due and honourable maintenance. The improvements of their incomes have been very considerable in late times. I know not whether bishop Burnet, who certainly had the means of knowing, is correct in saying, that in Charles 2nd's time, all benefices in Scotland were raised to 50%. sterling; but I have been given to understand, that the church of Scotland, particularly taking into consideration the cheapness of education and cheapness of living, may be deemed a better endowed church than the parochial church of England. Which distribution of the church revenues is preferable, is a question (if it can possibly be made a question in the actual state of things), which must be examined not simply by a view of the distributions themselves, but with reference so many important circumstances con

nected with the civil policy of the two parts of the island. This I may venture to say, as a general position, in spite of the bright exception of the church of Scotland, that the general effect of an equality and mediocrity of provision, is to produce an equality and mediocrity of talent; and I think I do not misrepresent in saying, that it has had some such effect upon the foreign protestant churches, when I refer what they have produced, to any comparison with the splendor of the literary fame of the church of England. One thing I am sorry to learn from the statisti. cal accounts of the worthy baronet, that the number of youths educated for the church in many parts of Scotland, is considerably falling off. It rather looks as if the profession, notwithstanding the kinder treatment it has lately received, has not yet obtained its fair share in the growing prosperity of that country.

Sir, I have to apologise for digressing to these topics; in returning, I must observe, that in the state of the church, I have described, universal residence is out of the question. How can the public demand, under pains and penalties, that there shall be a resident incumbent in each parish, when so large a proportion of the benefices in the kingdom do not pay more than what most of us in this House pay to our upper servants? There are, I suppose, three thousand livings not exceeding 50l. a year, and many below it. When I look at the real situation of the clergy, at the distresses and difficulties of a very large proportion of them, men must be made of sterner stuff than I happen to be composed of, who can say that this matter is to be put upon the footing of a rigid, universal, unbending obligation, to be applied with a mathematical apathy to all cases without the least consideration of men's families or their fortunes! Let us remember, that we are providing, not physical laws for the government of matter, but moral regulations for the conduct of a great number of men, placed in an infinite variety of situations, the effects of which must be taken into the account, and with a candid and humane consideration. Gentlemen say, and I am sure with the very best intentions, "give us clear, general rules; we desire to have nothing to do with any man's discretion." My answer is "Give me a subject that admits of clear general rules: this is not one of them." If the benefices of the kingdom were all equal, and the men who held

them were all single men, it would be easy to take the compasses out of one's pocket, and to mete out exactly the extent of indulgence, that might universally be granted to men, simply and uniformly situated; but you cannot apply a straight rule to a surface infinitely uneven and irregular. Here are above eleven thousand persons in conditions of great disparity, of different habits of life, of no small difference of education and attainments, of church incomes that bear no proportion to each other, and of family circumstances that are equally disproportionate. What is to be done? The rule, that would be no more than a just rule, applied to the opulent rector, would be a rule of severe oppression upon the poor man, with his benefice of 30%. a year, who is driven to eke out his family subsistence by a more beneficial employment of himself elsewhere. Will you construct your rule upon the scale of the value of benefices? To say nothing of the different value of money, in different parts of the island, the different state of men's families will still create a monstrous inequality; for no man will deny, that a single man, and a married man with ten children, living each upon the same income of 70l. a year are in a state of great inequality. All that can be done in such a subject is to call in a discretion, to operate on this infinite variety of circumstances. God forbid that I should mean an interested jobbing partiality! I mean a prudent and humane discretion, that is, to distribute itself honestly, and honourably, between the just rights of the public service on the one side, and the necessity of private convenience on the other as far as the infirmity of human judgment will allow. Another consideration calls with a loud voice for the existence and exercise of a discretion; I mean the consideration that must be had of that meritorious body of men, the curates. Establish a rigid rule of residence to be carried into a hasty effect, under the letter of a statute, and you turn these persons adrift, from situations where they have spent their lives innocently and usefully, to seek their bread where, on a supposition of universal residence, it is not to be found, perhaps, at an advanced time of life, and with families dependent upon them. These persons must be tenderly considered; if there is a curate who has long demeaned himself with propriety in a station, it would, in my opinion, be not more than a just exercise of discretion, to

bear with the absence of the incumbent, till that curate is removed, in some way consistent with the attention due to his interests; otherwise the reformation of incumbents will be the persecution of curates. A discretion therefore must be called in, at least till the charity and piety of parliament has put the lower parts of the church establishment on a more favourable footing: and the only question can be, where shall that discretion be placed? And of that question, I say, that it must be determined by the result of this question, where can it be most constitu tionally placed? that is with reference to the general frame of the church establishment, to the principles on which it is founded, and to the nature and character of the authorities that exist in it?

Upon all the different grounds I have stated, a necessity exists of revising the statute. What I have to offer I desire to propose as merely a provisional or interim bill; for I can never repeat too frequently, that till the situation of the lower clergy, is improved with respect to their incomes, their parsonage houses, and other circumstances, which I trust will soon become the subjects of parliamentary attention, nothing radical, nothing perma nent can be projected. But, so far as the present bill is concerned, I beg leave to state the principles on which, I conceive, with all deference, the legislature ought proceed to the consideration of such a subject. In the first place, not to recede from ancient foundations, not to attempt reformations, particularly in the present disordered state of the church finances, upon high, à priori, notions of a theoreti cal perfection, but to use and apply the existing means in the constitution, in order to obtain such a quantity of good effect as is really attainable; to keep to that which, considering the familiarity of ancient usage, the attachment of habit, and the uniformity of general system, promises to be practically the most commodious; to give confidence, and to allow discretion where the constitution has vested discretion, has required confidence; and to guard, by reasonable caution, against the perils of a blind confidence and an abused discretion, Secondly, not to look to a petty harassing system of regulations, that is to be dogging and hunting men in every hour of their lives, and at every turn of their steps, for no sufficient purpose of respectable utility, but to a substantial bona fide enforcement of

« PreviousContinue »