Morality and Rational ChoicePublic controversies - such as those about the distribution of goods between rich and poor, trade and population policies, allocation of medical resources, and the tradeoff between environment al protection and economic efficiency - often hinge on fundamental views about how we ought to make decisions tImt affect each other, that is, what principles we ought to follow. Efforts to find an acceptable public philosophy, a set of such principles on which people might agree, have foundered because of dis agreement among philosophers and others who are concerned with such issues. One view, which I shall develop and defend here, holds that decisions that affect others should be made according to an overall evaluation of the consequences of each option. This consequentialist view is opposed by a variety of alternatives, but many of the alternatives have in COlllmon a basis in moral intuition. To take a simple example, consequentialism holds that, other things equal, if we have decided that it is better to let a terminally ill patient die than to prolong her agony by keeping her alive, then we ought to kill her. |
Contents
Introduction 1160 | 1 |
Morality and decision making | 15 |
The nature of goals | 31 |
Expected utility theory | 49 |
Decisions for others | 75 |
Selfother conflict | 87 |
Acts and omissions | 99 |
vi | 121 |
Decision analysis and public policy | 139 |
Equity in social policy and liability | 151 |
The risk analysis debate | 167 |
Social decisions | 179 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
achieve our goals act-omission distinction acts altruism ambiguity effect argue argument assume assumption avocados axioms Baron behavior Case-by-case cause choice compensation conflict conjoint measurement consequences consequentialist consider contingent cooperativeness cooperation decision analysis decision maker decision theory depend desire economic Elster endorse equal equity error euthanasia evaluation example expected utility expected-utility theory follow future goals Gamble goal achievement goals concerning Hare harm idea ideals implies incentive injurer interpersonal comparison intuitive rules irrelevant judgment justified marginal utility methods normative omission bias omissions optimal option Other-other decisions outcomes person possible prefer prescriptive probability problem psychological punishment question Raiffa rational reason relevant risk self-interest Shavell situation social dilemmas someone sort standards strict liability subgoals subjects Subset Thaler things tort law total utility trolley problem University Press utilitarianism utility function utility theory vaccine victim violates vote