Scepticism, Knowledge, and Forms of Reasoning
"The problem of philosophical scepticism is not so much what to say about the view itself (there being a consensus that it should be rejected), but rather what to say about the arguments that purport to yield it. And since these arguments involve claims and principles concerning notions like knowledge and possibility, it is difficult to see how to explore the arguments without exploring these notions too."—from the IntroductionHow do we address philosophical arguments whose conclusions contradict our commonsense knowledge? For example: a logically impeccable argument that concludes that you cannot know that you are at this very moment reading a description of a book of philosophy. That is the problem of philosophical scepticism. Scepticism, Knowledge, and Forms of Reasoning is an attempt to resolve how best to respond to such vexing arguments, a matter on which there is no consensus among contemporary philosophers. Rather than denying the premises of such arguments or simply declaring them invalid, John Koethe delves into what such arguments reveal about the nature of reasoning itself. He suggests that there is nothing straightforwardly wrong with sceptical arguments, and that in recognizing this while at the same time honoring our commonsense convictions about knowledge, we confront profound questions about the very nature of reasoning.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Sceptical Arguments and
Knowledge and Possibility
The Status of the Sceptics Premises
accept account of knowledge algebra argued assertibility-conditions assertion assessment attitudes belief Boolean brain Chapter claim to know claims to knowledge common sense concept of knowledge conclusion conforms consequences consider context Contextualist deductive reasoning deny DeRose DeRose's Descartes dreaming dreaming-type arguments endorse epistemic concepts epistemic possibility epistemic practices epistemological realism establish explains fact forms of reasoning formulated G. E. Moore guments Heyting algebra idea impersonal notion individual propositional knowledge inductive instance interior operation interpretation intuitions involving John Koethe kind knowl knowledge and possibility knowledge by deduction knowledge claims knowledge's being available known legitimate logical modus ponens Moore Moore's paradox moral luck not-p philosophical scepticism problem proposal propositional knowledge question refutation reject relevant community response to scepticism role rule of inference sceptic's premise sceptical arguments sceptical hypothesis seems simply someone suggest teeth tion topological transmission principle truth truth-conditions University Press valid Wittgenstein Wright