must, unquestionably, pay the damages, to a farthing; but though such malicious servant might also be indicted, so as to subject himself to death, or other punishment by to be an exception to every other human act? Why is a man to be answerable criminaliter, for the crime of his servant, in this instance, it is shocking to humanity, and insulting to common sense. How is this vindicated? vindicated From the supposed necessity of the case. An indictment for a libel is, therefore, considered to be an anomaly - in the law. that is, [CHARGED BY THE INDICTMENT. the publication of the libel - WITH THE INTENTION 3. CONTENTIOUS AFFIRMATION. This might also be called the Forensic style; being that used in the most vehement debates, and by lawyers, in their most powerful pleadings. It expresses the extreme of earnestness in contending for victory, or in striving to gain a cause; and calls for a corresponding degree of mental and bodily energy. Its tone is that of the compound stress; i. e. a stress first at the beginning and then at the end of a syllable. The middle part of the slide is less forcible than the commencement, and instead of a vanishing termination, a sudden force is given at the end. Hence the terminal consonants of syllables and words are very strongly enunciated, and the articulation is forcibly distinct. The gestures are numerous, and made with great strength and heartiness. The extracts on pp. 56, 262, and 275, are from powerful pleadings of great lawyers, and require this style. The following extract is from a speech of the most powerful of the French orators. Its object is to prevail on the legislature to adopt, without examination, an extreme measure intended to rescue France from national bankruptcy. It will be perceived that the overpowering vehemence of this style and the next one, causes the groups to be long; and not only multiplies emphatic words, but sometimes makes more than one emphatic inflexion necessary in a phrase. Has not the Minister of Finance drawn a most ALARMING PICTURE Has he not told you of our present situation? |