Heptinstall to enter into a Recogce on it. Dickson against Dickson. Mac Callum against Grant. Budge & Co. et al. against vost, &c. of The Ld. Pro A Petition of John Mac Callum, Appellant in a Cause depending in this House, to which The Reverend James Grant is Respondent; praying, "That their Lordships will "be pleased to order him to be admitted to appear as "an Appellant in this Cause in formá pauperis; and to assign him for his Counsel "and for his Solicitor be presented to the House; and being offered to And it appearing that the Certificate was not signed by the Minister of the Parish in the usual Manner, in consequence of his being interested as a Respondent, but an Affidavit stating that Fact being annexed to the Petition, together with a satisfactory Certificate of the Poverty of the Appellant: Ordered, That the said Petition be received. Then the said Petition was presented and read. Ordered, That the Petitioner be at liberty to prosecute his said Appeal in formá pauperis in this House, as desired. Upon reading the Petition of The Lord Provost, Magistrates, and Town Council of the City of Edinburgh, Respondents in a Cause depending in this House, to which David Budge and Company, and others, are ApRespondents pellants; praying, "That their Lordships will be pleased "to permit their Case to be received:" Edinburgh, Petition to receive their Case, referred to Appeal Comee. Order in Council for Admission of Foreign Grain, delivered. Adjourn. It is Ordered, That the said Petition be referred to the Committee appointed to consider of the Causes in which Prints of the Appellants and Respondents Cases, now depending in this House in Matters of Appeals and Writs of Error, have not been delivered, pursuant to the Standing Orders of this House. The Earl of Liverpool (by His Majesty's Command) laid before the House, "Copy of His Majesty's Order in Council of 1st Sep"tember 1826, for the Admission into the Ports of the "United Kingdom of certain Sorts of Foreign Grain." And the Title thereof being read by the Clerk Ordered, That the said Paper do lie on the Table. Ordered, That the said Paper be printed. ; Dominus Cancellarius declaravit præsens Parliamentum continuandum esse usque ad et in diem Veneris, vicesimum quartum diem instantis Novembris, horâ undecimâ Aurora, Dominis sic decernentibus. Epus. Exon. Epus. Landaven. Ds. Clinton. PRAYERS. fuerunt: Comes Eldon, Cancellarius. Comes Harrowby, Comes Westmorland, C. P. S. Comes Shaftesbury. Comes Rosebery. Comes Oxford & Mortimer. Vicecom. Leinster. Vicecom. Melville. Archibald John Earl of Rosebery. Edward Earl of Oxford and Earl Mortimer. Augustus Frederick Viscount Leinster. The House being moved, "That a Day may be ap- Viscount pointed for hearing the Cause wherein Henry Augustus Dillon & "Viscount Dillon and Charles Butler are Appellants, and Butler "William Plasket and James Brett are Respondents:" It is Ordered, That this House will hear the said Cause, by Counsel at the Bar, on the first vacant Day for Causes after those already appointed. The AttyGen. of London, complaining of a Decree of the Court of (Banck's Exchequer, of the 30th of May 1826; and praying, "That Charity :) "the same may be reversed, and that such other Order may be made in the Premises, as to this House, in "their Lordships great Wisdom, shall seem meet; and "that His Majesty's Attorney General may be required "to answer the said Appeal :" Barnes to enter into a may It is Ordered, That His Majesty's Attorney General have a Copy of the said Appeal, and do put in his Answer thereunto, in Writing, on or before Friday the 8th Day of December next. The House being moved, "That James Barnes, Clerk " of the Mercers Company, may be permitted to enter Recogee on it. «into a Recognizance for the Wardens and Commonalty "of the Mystery of Mercers of the City of London, on "account of their Appeal depending in this House :" It is Ordered, That the said James Barnes may enter into a Recognizance for the said Appellants, as desired. Roscommon Claim, Claimant's Petition for ing. "The Second Report of the Commissioners of Irish "Education Inquiry." And also, "The Third Report of the Commissioners "of Irish Education Inquiry.' 66 And the Titles thereof being read by the Clerk ; Upon reading the Petition of Michael James Robert Dillon Esquire, claiming a Right to vote, as Earl of Roscommon and Baron of Kilkenny West, at the Elections of further Hear- Representative Peers for Ireland; setting forth, "That by their Lordships Order of the 28th Day of April last "it is set forth, That it appeared to the House, by the "Report of The Attorney General for Ireland, made in "pursuance of their Lordships Order of the 15th of "March last, that divers Matters had been suggested "to him as Evidence of the Right of the Claimant, "Francis Stephen Dillon, to the Dignity of Earl of Ros"common, which the House conceived ought to be made. "the Subject of further Inquiry, and that for that Pur"pose it would be fit that His Majesty's Attorney Gene"ral for Ireland should be Ordered to attend the House "in future in all Matters relating to this Claim; and "that in the mean time the said Attorney General was "Ordered to obtain such Evidence as he could procure respecting this Claim, to be produced to this House "and that Mr. Thomas Allan, who appeared to have been "Agent for the Claimant Francis Stephen Dillon, was to "be Ordered to attend the House on a Day to be ap"pointed, and to produce the Documents in his Hands. 66 66 66 ; relating to the Claim of the said Francis Stephen Dillon, "at the Bar of the House, in the then next Session of “Parliament, as by the said Order, to which Petitioner humbly refers, may appear, and which Order was duly "served on The Attorney General for Ireland, by leaving "a true Copy thereof at his Lodgings in Saint James's "Street, Westminster, on the Day after the same bears "Date, and was also served on Mr. Thomas Allan, the "Person named therein, on the same or following Day;" and therefore praying their Lordships "to appoint Mon"day the 4th Day of December next, for the Attendance 4 "of the said Thomas Allan, in order that he may produce "to their Lordships the Documents in his Hands relating "to the Claim of his late Client Francis Stephen Dillon; " and that His Majesty's Attorney General for Ireland "be likewise Ordered to attend, pursuant to their Lordships said Order of the 28th Day of April last;" and further praying their Lordships, "That Mr. Thomas Raymond Alsop, the Petitioner's Agent, be Ordered to "attend at their Lordships Bar, to be sworn, and give "Evidence of the Service and Writing of all Orders, Notices, and Letters entrusted to him, and directed by "the Petitioner to be served and written :" 66 200 to 209 The Order of the Day being read for taking into Con- Standing sideration the Standing Orders Nos. 200, 201, 202, 203, Orders Nos 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, and 209, relative to the Hearing inclusive, of Causes; and for the Lords to be summoned; suspended. The said Standing Orders were severally read by the Clerk. Ordered, That the said Standing Orders be suspended 'till the first Monday after the Recess at Christmas; and that the House do proceed to hear Causes on Wednesday next at Two o'clock. tions against: Upon reading the Petition of the Parishioners and In- Roman habitants of Wootton and its Vicinity, in the County of Catholic Kent, whose Names are thereunto subscribed; praying, Claims, Peti"That their Lordships will in their Wisdom take such (Wootton :) "Measures as shall effectually keep the Papists where they are, and uphold and defend unchanged the British "Protestant Constitution, as happily established at the "Reformation :" It is Ordered, That the said Petition do lie on the Table. Upon reading the Petition of the Inhabitants of the Clisthydon. Parish of Clisthydon, in the County of Devon, whose Names are thereunto subscribed; praying their Lordships, "not "to make such a radical and "portentous Change " "in the Constitution, as shall enable the Roman Catholics "to legislate, to judge, and to govern in our Protestant "Church :" It is Ordered, That the said Petition do lie on the Table. turned a Peer The House being informed, "That William Hodges, E. of Mount "from the Deputy Clerk of the Crown in Ireland, at- Cashell re"tended with the Writs and Returns for electing a Tem- for Ireland. poral Peer of Ireland in the room of Hugh Viscount "Carleton, deceased, with the Certificate of the Clerk of "the Crown in Ireland annexed to them;" He was called in; and being sworn and examined, "That he received the same acquainted their Lordships, " from the said Deputy Clerk of the Crown, and that they were now in the same Condition as when he received "them;" and then delivering the same at the Bar; He was directed to withdraw. Which Certificate was read, and is as follows; (viz1.) "In pursuance of an Act passed in the Fortieth Year "of the Reign of His late Majesty King George the Third, intitled, "An Act to regulate the Mode by " which the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and the Commons, to serve in the Parliament of the United King"dom on the Part of Ireland, shall be summoned and "returned to the said Parliament;" I do hereby certify, "that the several Writs hereunto annexed, for electing "a Temporal Peer of Ireland in the room of Hugh "Viscount Carleton, deceased, did issue from this Office "to the Peers therein severally named, and that the said "Peers did severally make the Returns thereto which "to the said Writs are respectively annexed; And I "further certify, that it appears from the said Writs "and Returns, that Stephen Earl of Mount Cashell has "been chosen by a Majority of Votes to be the Peer "to sit and vote on the Part of Ireland in the House "of Lords of the United Kingdom, in the room of the "said Hugh Viscount Carleton: All which I attest this "First Day of July One thousand eight hundred and "twenty-six. 66 66 It was moved, "That the Order made on Wednesday last, referring the Petition of Donald Cuthbertson, Respondent (by Revivor) in a Cause depending in this "House, to which John Dick is Appellant, praying Leave to lodge his Case, to the Committee appointed to con"sider of the Causes in which Prints of the Appellants " and Respondents Cases, now depending in this House "in Matters of Appeals and Writs of Error, have not ❝ been delivered, pursuant to the Standing Orders of this House, be now read." 66 The same was accordingly read by the Clerk. Ordered, That the said Order be discharged. Ordered, That the Petitioner be at liberty to lodge his Case To-morrow. Ordered, That the said Cause be heard, by Counsel at the Bar, on Wednesday next, at Two o'clock. Ordered, That the Cause wherein Jane Glegg, and others, are Appellants, and Richard Legh is Respondent, be heard, by Counsel at the Bar, on Thursday next, at Two o'Clock. Ordered, That the Cause wherein Henry Cherry is Appellant, and Richard Legh, and others, are Respondents, be heard, by Counsel at the Bar, on Thursday next, at Two o'Clock. 66 The House being moved, "That a Day may be appointed for hearing the Cause wherein the Bailiffs, Burgesses, and Commonalty of the Town or Borough of "Ludlow, and Edward Earl of Powis, are Appellants, and "Richard Greenhouse, and others, are Respondents, ex"parte, the Respondents not having delivered their printed "Case, pursuant to the Standing Orders of this House :" It is Ordered, That this House will hear the said Cause ex-parte, by Counsel at the Bar, on the first vacant Day for Causes after those already appointed, unless the Respondents deliver their printed Case in the mean time. Upon reading the Petition and Appeal of John Camp. bell Esquire, of Kilberry, John Campbell Esquire, of Stonefield, James Campbell Esquire, of Dunmore, Donald Mac Quilkan at Couldrynoch, Angus MacQuilkan at Couldrynoch, and Captain Colin Campbell of Ardpatrick, all Heritors of the Parish of Kilberry, and The Reverend John M'Farlane, the Moderator of the Presbytery of Kintyre, for himself, and in name and behalf of and as representing the said Presbytery, Defenders in the Action therein mentioned; complaining of Three Interlocutors of the Lord Ordinary in Scotland, of the 11th of March, the 14th of May, and 10th of July 1824; also of Five Interlocutors of the Lords of Session there, of the First Division, of the 1st of February (signed 2d February), Two of the 2nd of March and the 15th of November (signed 16th November) 1825, and the 28th of January 1826; and also of Two Interlocutors of the said Lord Ordinary (following upon 18th of February 1826; and praying, "That the same the said Judgment of the Court of Session) of the 2d and may be reversed, varied or altered, in so far as appealed from, or that the Appellants may have such Relief in "the Premises, as to this House, in their Lordships great "Wisdom, shall seem meet; and that Donald Brown and "David Martin Black may be required to answer the "said Appeal:" 66 66 It is Ordered, That the said Donald Brown and David Martin Black may have a Copy of the said Appeal, and do put in their Answer or respective Answers thereunto, in Writing, on or before Monday the 25th Day of December next; and Service of this Order upon the said Respondents, or upon any one of their known Agents in the Court of Session in Scotland, shall be deemed good Service. The House being moved, "That George Webster of Webster to "Old Palace Yard, Westminster, Gentleman, may be enter into a "permitted to enter into a Recognizance for John Camp. Recogre on it. "bell Esquire, and others, on account of their Appeal depending in this House, they living in Scotland :' 66 It is Ordered, That the said George Webster may enter into a Recognizance for the said Appellants, as desired. 66 Stair et al: Upon reading the Petition and Appeal of Mrs. Anne Robertsou Robertson, residing in Cupar, Executrix nominate of the against E. of late John Vans Agnew Esquire, of Sheuchan, complaining of an Interlocutor of the Lords of Session in Scotland, of the Second Division, of the 19th of May (signed 28d May) 1826, in so far as it finds that "the Defenders were bond fide Possessors of the several Subjects pur"chased by them down to the Period of the Judgment " of The House of Lords on 31st July 1822; and there"fore repel the Claim of the Pursuer, so far as concerns "the Rents thereof for Crop and Year 1822, and preceding "Years, and decern ;" and also of another Interlocutor of the said Lords of Session, of the 24th of June 1826, in so far as it does not find the Appellant entitled to Expences; and praying, "That the same may be reversed, varied or altered, so far as complained of, or that the Appellant may have such Relief in the Premises, as to this House, " in their Lordships great Wisdom, shall seem meet; and "that John William Henry now Earl of Stair, Patrick "Maitland, Sir David Hunter Blair Baronet, Forbes Hun"ter Blair, Ramsay Hannay, Alexander M‘Lean, and "Charles Stewart, as Trustees of William Hannay; Mrs. "Jane Johnston, Ramsay Hannay, Peter Johnston, and "Alexander Gordon, as Trustees of Johnston Hannay; "Alexander M'Neil, John M'Taggart, Captain M'Tag"gart, John M'Kessock, William M Kessock, James "M'Kessock, Andrew Douglas, John M'Dowall, William "M'Master, James M'Master, William Gifford, Mrs. "Janet Hannay, Spouse of James Gordon, and him for "his Interest; Mrs. Margaret Hannay, Spouse of The "Reverend James Hamilton, and him for his Interest; "John M'Kennel, Henry M'Kennel, Catherine M‘Kennel, Spouse of William Caldwell, and him for his Interest; "Mary Ann Shackleton M'Kennel, Spouse of Simpson, and him for his Interest; Ann Shackleton "M'Kennel, William M'Kennel, William Caldwell, and "Charles Moreland, Trustees of Patrick M'Kennel; " I S Adams, and Edward Boyd, as Trustees "of the deceased James M'Taggart; John Aitken, the " said Alexander M'Neel, John Wallace and Thomas Wal"lace, as Trustees or Executors of the deceased William "Wallace, may be required to answer the said Appeal.” It is Ordered, That the said Earl of Stair, and the several other Persons last named, may have a Copy of the said Appeal, and do put in their Answer or respective Answers thereunto, in Writing, on or before Monday the 25th Day of December next; and Service of this Order upon the said Respondents, or upon any one of their known Agents in the Court of Session in Scotland, shall be deemed good Service. Leitch et al. 66 It is Ordered, That the said Alexander Fraser may enter into a Recognizance for the said Appellant, as desired. Upon reading the Petition and Appeal of Mrs. Christian against Smith Leitch and Mary Leitch, Sisters of the late John Leitch & Lang: Esquire, Merchant in Glasgow, and of William Shortridge, Husband of the said Mrs. Mary Leitch, and Agnes Trokes, Spouse of Archibald Hamilton, Merchant in Glasgow, and her Husband for his Interest, and Mrs. Jean Trokes, Spouse of Peter M'Adam of Easterhouse, and her Husband for his Interest; complaining of an Interlocutor of the Lords of Session in Scotland, of the Second Division, of the 2d of June 1826; and praying, "That the same may be "reversed, varied or altered, or that the Appellants may "have such Relief in the Premises, as to this House, in "their Lordships great Wisdom, shall seem meet; and "that William Smith Esquire, Merchant in Glasgow, and "James Lang, Writer to the Signet, surviving accepting "Trustees of the deceased Andrew Leitch, late Captain "on the Half Pay of His Majesty's 60th Regiment of "Foot, may be required to answer the said Appeal :" Fraser to enter into a It is Ordered, That the said William Smith and James Lang may have a Copy of the said Appeal, and do put in their Answer or respective Answers thereunto, in Writing, on or before Monday the 25th Day of December next; and Service of this Order upon the said Respondents, or upon any one of their known Agents in the Court of Session in Scotland, shall be deemed good Service. The House being moved, "That Alexander Fraser of "Lincoln's Inn Fields, Gentleman, may be permitted to Recogee on it. << enter into a Recognizance for Mrs. Christian Leitch, and "others, on account of their Appeal depending in this "House, they residing in Scotland:" Murrays against Murray : Calender to enter into a It is Ordered, That the said Alexander Fraser may enter into a Recognizance for the said Appellants, as desired. Upon reading the Petition and Appeal of Donald Murray Esquire, residing at Bay, in the Island of Skye, the sole accepting and acting Trustee of the late John Murray Esquire of Grishernish, his Father, and of Angus Murray, Son of the said Donald Murray, with the Advice and Consent of the said Donald Murray, as his Administrator in Law; complaining of Three Interlocutors of the Lords of Session in Scotland, of the First Division, of the 21st of January, the 30th of May, and 14th of June 1826; and praying, "That the same may be " reversed, varied or altered, so far as complained of, or "that the Appellants may have such Relief in the Pre"mises, as to this House, in their Lordships great Wisdom, "shall seem meet; and that Angus Murray, Pursuer of "the Process of Reduction and Improbation therein "mentioned, may be required to answer the said Appeal :" 66 It is Ordered, That the said Angus Murray may have a Copy of the said Appeal, and do put in his Answer thereunto, in Writing, on or before Monday the 25th Day of December next; and Service of this Order upon the said Respondent, or upon any one of his known Agents in the Court of Session in Scotland, shall be deemed good Service. The House being moved, "That George Calender of "Parliament Street, Westminster, Gentleman, may be Recogee on it." permitted to enter into a Recognizance for Donald "Murray Esquire, and Angus Murray, on account of "their Appeal depending in this House, they residing in "Scotland:" It is Ordered, That the said George Calender may enter into a Recognizance for the said Appellants, as desired. Duffield et al. Upon reading the Petition and Appeal of Caroline against Duffield, Maria Duffield, Anna Duffield, Susan Eliza Duf Duffield et al: field, and Henry Duffield, Infants; complaining of Part of a Decretal Order of the Court of Chancery, of the 29th of April 1826; and praying, "That so much ΙΟ 66 "thereof as is thereby appealed from may be reversed, "and that it may be declared by their Lordships Judg"ment that the Appellants, and the Respondent George "Thomas Warren Hastings Duffield, are entitled to all "the intermediate Rents, Issues and Profits of the "Testator's Real Estates at Southwood Park and Haver"hill, devised, in manner therein mentioned, by his Will, "and to his Freehold Estates comprised in the Executory "Devise contained in his Codicil, during the Suspense " and until the vesting of the Executory Devises thereof respectively, subject only to the Application of a suf"ficient Part of the Rents and Profits of the said South"wood Park and Haverhill Estates, for the Maintenance "of the presumptive Devisee or Devisees thereof; or that "their Lordships may grant the Appellants such Relief "in the Premises, as to this House, in their Lordships great Wisdom, shall seem meet; and that Thomas Duffield Esquire, and Emily Frances his Wife, George "Thomas Warren Hastings Duffield, The Reverend "William Hicks Clerk, and Amelia Maria his Wife, "Francis Const, George Law, Abraham Henry Chambers, "Robert Greenhill Russell Esquire, and George Spencer "Smith, may be required to answer the said Appeal :” It is Ordered, That the said Thomas Duffield, and the several other Persons last named, may have a Copy of the said Appeal, and do put in their Answer or respective Answers thereunto, in Writing, on or before Monday the 11th Day of December next; and Service of this Order upon the said Respondents, or upon their Clerks in Court, or Solicitors in the said Court of Chancery, shall be deemed good Service. Hicks et al: Upon reading the Petition and Appeal of Thomas Duffield et Duffield Esquire, and Emily Frances his Wife, complaining Ux. against of Part of a Decretal Order of the Court of Chancery, of the 29th of April 1826, made in Three certain Causes; in the First of which, the said Thomas Duffield and Emily Frances his Wife were Plaintiffs, and Amelia Maria Elwes Widow, Francis Const, George Law, Abraham Henry Chambers Esquire, The Reverend William Hicks Clerk, and George Thomas Warren Hastings Duffield, Caroline Duffield, Maria Duffield, Anna Duffield, and Susan Eliza Duffield, Infants, were Defendants, by original and amended Bill; in the Second, the said Thomas Duffield and Emily Frances his Wife were Plaintiffs, and Robert Greenhill Russell Esquire, George Spencer Smith, the said William Hicks and Amelia Maria his Wife, late Amelia Maria Elwes Widow, were Defendants by Supplemental Bill; and in the last the said Thomas Duffield and Emily Frances his Wife were Plaintiffs, and Henry Duffield, an Infant, was Defendant, by Second Supplemental Bill; and praying, "That so much of the said "Decretal Order as is thereby appealed from may be " reversed, and that it may be declared by their Lordships Judgment, that the Appellants, in Right of the Appellant Emily Frances Duffield, as Heir at Law and Customary Heir of the Testator George Elwes, are "entitled to all the intermediate Rents, Issues, and Profits "of the said Testator's Real Estates at Southwood Park "and Haverhill, devised in manner therein mentioned, by "his Will, and to his Freehold Estates comprised in the Executory Devise contained in his Codicil, during the Suspense, and until the vesting of the Executory Devises "thereof respectively, subject only to the Application of "a sufficient Part of the Rents and Profits of the said "Southwood Park and Haverhill Estates, for the Main"tenance of the presumptive Devisee or Devisees thereof; "or that their Lordships may grant the Appellants such "Relief in the Premises, as to this House, in their Lordships great Wisdom, shall seem meet; and that the said "William Hicks and Amelia Maria his Wife, Francis "Const, George Law, Abraham Henry Chambers, George "Thomas Warren Hastings Duffield, Caroline Duffield, "Maria Duffield, Anna Duffield, Susan Eliza Duffield, Henry Duffield, Robert Greenhill Russell, and George "Spencer Smith, may be required to answer the said Appeal:" Upon reading the Petition of William Plasket and James Brett, Respondents in a Cause depending in this House, to which Henry Augustus Viscount Dillon, and Charles It is Ordered, That the said Petition be referred to the Case, referred Committee appointed to consider of the Causes in which Prints of the Appellants and Respondents Cases, now depending in this House in Matters of Appeals and Writs It is Ordered, That the said Petition be referred to the Committee appointed to consider of the Causes in which Prints of the Appellants and Respondents Cases, now depending in this House in Matters of Appeals and Writs of Error, have not been delivered, pursuant to the Standing Orders of this House. Upon reading the Petition of Mrs. Anne Robertson, of against Grier- the City of Edinburgh, Disponee and Executrix and son, Petition Personal Representative of John Vans Agnew Esquire, late Appellant in a Cause depending in this House, to which Thomas Grierson is Respondent; setting forth, "That the Appeal which was brought into this House, "and prosecuted by the said late John Vans Agnew, as "Tenant in Tail of the Estates of Sheuchan and Barn- "barroch, hath become abated by his Death: That by "the Demise of the said John Vans Agnew unmarried, "the Succession to his Entailed Estates hath devolved 66 upon his next immediate Brother Patrick Vans Agnew Esquire, a Lieutenant Colonel in the Service of The "East India Company on the Madras Establishment, "but now on his Return to this Country: That the "Succession to the Personal Property of the said John "Vans Agnew hath devolved upon the Petitioner as his "general Disponee and sole Executrix; but inasmuch as "the Object sought by the Respondent in the Court below, of a personal Decree against the said late Appellant, as Tenant for Life of the Entailed Estates "of his Family, as well as for Performance of certain "alleged personal and conditional Obligations of his respective Capacities of Heir at Law, and of Entail, "and of Personal Representative: That on the 19th Day "ment, it becomes necessary for her to renew her Appli- "cation to their Lordships;" and therefore praying, "That their Lordships will be pleased to order that the "said Appeal may stand revived in the Petitioner's Name, "in so far only as she is interested as the Personal "Representative of the said John Vans Agnew, and that "the Petitioner may have the same Benefit of the said further praying, "That their Lordships will be pleased "to order that the said Appeal may also stand revived "in the Name of the said Patrick Vans Agnew, as Heir "at Law and of Entail of his said late Brother John "Vans Agnew; and that Service of their Lordships Order "on the known Counsel and Agent of the said Patrick "Vans Agnew in the Court of Session in Scotland, or "either of them, may be deemed good Service:" It is Ordered, That the said Petition be referred to the Committee appointed to consider of the Causes in which Prints of the Appellants and Respondents Cases, now depending in this House in Matters of Appeals and The House being informed, "That Sir William Fettes Lawsons "Lawson, had not put in their Answer to the said And thereupon an Affidavit of John Brown of the City of Edinburgh, Writer, of the due Service of the said Ordered, That there be laid before this House, “An Price of "Account of the Price of Wheat per Quarter, as exhi- Wheat, "bited in the Register kept in the Audit Books of Eton College, from the Year 1646 to Michaelmas 1826; Ordered. reducing the Quarter of Nine Bushels, in which it was kept from 1646 to Michaelmas 1793, to the Winchester |