The Oxford Handbook of AestheticsJerrold Levinson The Oxford Handbooks series is a major new initiative in academic publishing. Each volume offers an authoritative and up-to-date survey of original research in a particular subject area. Specially commissioned essays from leading figures in the discipline give critical examinations of the progress and direction of debates. Oxford Handbooks provide scholars and graduate students with compelling new perspectives upon a wide range of subjects in the humanities and social sciences. The Oxford Handbook of Aesthetics brings the authority, liveliness, and multi-disciplinary scope of the Handbook series to the area where philosophy meets the arts. Jerrold Levinson has assembled a hugely impressive range of talent to contribute 48 brand-new essays, making this the most comprehensive guide available to the theory, application, history, and future of the field. This Handbook will be invaluable to academics and students across philosophy and all branches of the arts, both as the reference work of choice and as a stimulus to new research and creativity. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 83
Page 326
... distinction . However , some have argued that the distinction is in fact not useful . There has been a debate , initiated by Frank Sibley , about whether aesthetic concepts can be distinguished from non - aesthetic concepts ( Sibley ...
... distinction . However , some have argued that the distinction is in fact not useful . There has been a debate , initiated by Frank Sibley , about whether aesthetic concepts can be distinguished from non - aesthetic concepts ( Sibley ...
Page 333
... distinction between free and dependent beauty miss the crucial teleological dimension of the distinction . They think that depend- ent beauty is just a matter of subsuming a thing under a concept . But the crucial thing is subsuming ...
... distinction between free and dependent beauty miss the crucial teleological dimension of the distinction . They think that depend- ent beauty is just a matter of subsuming a thing under a concept . But the crucial thing is subsuming ...
Page 737
... distinction was grounded in merit or in taste , whether it could be a purely social distinction , and whether it coincided with the distinction between mass and avant - garde art ( Novitz 1989 ; Carroll 1992 : 5–38 ) . A second cluster ...
... distinction was grounded in merit or in taste , whether it could be a purely social distinction , and whether it coincided with the distinction between mass and avant - garde art ( Novitz 1989 ; Carroll 1992 : 5–38 ) . A second cluster ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
aesthetic appreciation aesthetic experience aesthetic judgements aesthetic properties aesthetic realism aesthetic theory aesthetic value Aesthetics and Art appears architecture argued Aristotle Art Criticism artforms Arthur Danto artistic artworks artworld audience Beardsley beauty British Journal Cambridge University Press Carroll character claim cognitive conception Cornell University Cornell University Press creative cultural dance Danto definition of art Dickie distinction emotion Essays evaluative example expression feminist aesthetics fiction film function Goodman Hegel Huichol human Hume humour idea imagine instance intention interpretation Ithaca Journal of Aesthetics Kant Kant's kind Kivy Levinson literary literature meaning metaphor Monroe Beardsley moral narrative natural environment Noël Carroll normative object Ontology Oxford University Press painting Pennsylvania State University perception performance Philosophy photographs pleasure poetry qualities question R. G. Collingwood relation relevant representation response Scruton sculpture sense style supervenience taste theory of art thetic things thought tion visual Walton Wollheim work's