Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Tennessee, Volume 9Tavel, Eastman & Howell, 1882 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 12
Page 238
... county . T. P. BATEMAN , J. PITTS & CUNNINGHAM for Duncan . CRUMLEY & HAMILTON for Starr . DEADERICK , C. J. , delivered the opinion of the court . This is an action of replevin to recover a cow . The writ was executed and the property ...
... county . T. P. BATEMAN , J. PITTS & CUNNINGHAM for Duncan . CRUMLEY & HAMILTON for Starr . DEADERICK , C. J. , delivered the opinion of the court . This is an action of replevin to recover a cow . The writ was executed and the property ...
Page 450
... Hamilton county , a counterpart , so - called , was issued in each case to be served on the complainants in Knox county . These last named warrants were not exact counterparts of the originals . They are issued only against White and ...
... Hamilton county , a counterpart , so - called , was issued in each case to be served on the complainants in Knox county . These last named warrants were not exact counterparts of the originals . They are issued only against White and ...
Page 467
... Co. SUPREME COURT PRACTICE . Depositions . Bill of exceptions . Depositions taken ... county . D. C. TREWHITT , J. TOMLINSON FORT for Neef & Whigham . A. J. ... Hamilton , by plaintiffs , to recover for work and labor done for defendants ...
... Co. SUPREME COURT PRACTICE . Depositions . Bill of exceptions . Depositions taken ... county . D. C. TREWHITT , J. TOMLINSON FORT for Neef & Whigham . A. J. ... Hamilton , by plaintiffs , to recover for work and labor done for defendants ...
Page 475
... HAMILTON . Appeal in error from the Circuit Court of Hamilton county . D. C. TREWHITT , J. KEY & . RICHMOND for ... Hamilton county . The sheriff returned the process " executed by serving the within on Charles F Railroad Co. v . Walker ...
... HAMILTON . Appeal in error from the Circuit Court of Hamilton county . D. C. TREWHITT , J. KEY & . RICHMOND for ... Hamilton county . The sheriff returned the process " executed by serving the within on Charles F Railroad Co. v . Walker ...
Page 476
... Hamilton county . " The defendant pleaded in abatement that it was a foreign corporation , created under the laws of ... county , Tennessee , and had no authority to accept service of process for defendant , and defendant had no office ...
... Hamilton county . " The defendant pleaded in abatement that it was a foreign corporation , created under the laws of ... county , Tennessee , and had no authority to accept service of process for defendant , and defendant had no office ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action administrator agent alleged amount Appeal in error assignment bank Baxt bill bond cause chancellor Chancery Court charge Chattanooga circuit court claim clerk Code complainant complainant's contract conveyance conveyed Cooper corporation counsel county court creditor damages debt debtor deceased declared decree deed of trust defendant DeLagerty delivered the opinion demurrer entitled equity estoppel execution facts favor fees filed fraud Greenlaw ground Hamilton county heirs Heis held insolvent intestate John John Baxter judge judgment jurisdiction jurors jury justice land liable lien Madison county McClung Memphis ment Mississippi Mills notes paid parties payment plainant plaintiff PLEADINGS possession proceedings proof provisions purchase money question Railroad Company recover rendered replevin Rogersville rule secure service of process Shelby Shelby county sheriff Sneed sold statute statute of limitations stockholders suit sureties term tion tract trial Turley vendor void
Popular passages
Page 479 - When a corporation, company, or individual has, for the transaction of any business, an office or agency in any county other than that in which the principal resides, service may be made on any agent or clerk employed in such office or agency, in all actions growing out of or connected with the business of that office or agency.
Page 615 - Provided, that the charge for transportation or conveyance shall not exceed thirty-five cents per hundred pounds, on heavy articles, and ten cents per cubic foot, on articles of measurement, for every hundred miles, and five cents a mile for every passenger : And, provided also, that the said company may, when they see fit, farm out their rights of transportation on the said road, or any of its branches, subject to the rates above mentioned.
Page 743 - Intentional fraud, in failing to comply substantially with the articles of incorporation, or in deceiving the public or individuals in relation to their means or their liabilities, shall subject those guilty thereof to fine and imprisonment or both, at the discretion of the court.
Page 363 - In all cases, as has been held, powers or trusts must be construed according to the intention of the parties, to be gathered from the whole instrument.
Page 100 - ... title; and the ultimate vendee, when evicted, is entitled to be subrogated to the rights of his immediate vendor against a remote vendor, to the extent necessary to indemnify him. Such a vendee, to use the language of the supreme court of North Carolina, sues a remote vendor on the covenant to redress his (the plaintiff's) own injuries, not the injuries of the immediate vendee of such remote vendor. Accordingly, that court held, in a case like the one before us, that the measure of damages was...
Page 580 - ... with the like right, title, power, and authority to sell, manage, dispose of, sue for, and recover or defend the same, as the bankrupt might...
Page 474 - The charge is also erroneous in instructing the jury that in estimating damages, they might take into consideration the loss of social relation of ' husband and wife, parent and child, etc., and the advice and protection of the deceased as wife and mother.
Page 52 - Memphis, and from that point to Shreveport by steamboat. While en route on the Mississippi River, and in the State of Mississippi, an accident occurred by which the wife and children were drowned. It appeared in proof that the different lines of road were separate and distinct, owned and controlled by different agents and officers, and that there was no contract or privity between them in regard to carrying passengers except the arrangement to sell through tickets. Under these circumstances, the...
Page 134 - We are of opinion that there is no error in the record for which the judgment should be reversed, and it is therefore affirmed.
Page 571 - ... which have been acted upon, or have been made to influence the conduct of others, or to derive some advantage to the party, and which cannot afterwards be denied without a breach of good faith.