Conceptual Spaces: The Geometry of ThoughtWithin cognitive science, two approaches currently dominate the problem of modeling representations. The symbolic approach views cognition as computation involving symbolic manipulation. Connectionism, a special case of associationism, models associations using artificial neuron networks. Peter Gärdenfors offers his theory of conceptual representations as a bridge between the symbolic and connectionist approaches. Symbolic representation is particularly weak at modeling concept learning, which is paramount for understanding many cognitive phenomena. Concept learning is closely tied to the notion of similarity, which is also poorly served by the symbolic approach. Gärdenfors's theory of conceptual spaces presents a framework for representing information on the conceptual level. A conceptual space is built up from geometrical structures based on a number of quality dimensions. The main applications of the theory are on the constructive side of cognitive science: as a constructive model the theory can be applied to the development of artificial systems capable of solving cognitive tasks. Gärdenfors also shows how conceptual spaces can serve as an explanatory framework for a number of empirical theories, in particular those concerning concept formation, induction, and semantics. His aim is to present a coherent research program that can be used as a basis for more detailed investigations. |
Contents
Dimensions | 1 |
12 Conceptual Spaces as a Framework for Representations | 4 |
13 Quality Dimensions | 6 |
14 Phenomenal and Scientific Interpretations of Dimensions | 8 |
Color Sound and Taste | 9 |
16 Some Mathematical Notions | 15 |
17 How Dimensions Are Identified | 21 |
18 Integral and Separable Dimensions | 24 |
47 Concept Dynamics and Nonmonotonic Reasoning | 131 |
48 Objects as Special Kinds of Concepts | 134 |
49 Four Geometrical Categorization Models | 136 |
410 The Shell Space | 142 |
411 Experiments | 145 |
Semantics | 151 |
52 Six Tenets of Cognitive Semantics | 159 |
53 Analyses of Some Aspects of Lexical Semantics | 167 |
19 On the Origins of Quality Dimensions | 26 |
110 Conclusion | 30 |
Symbolic Conceptual and Subconceptual Representations | 33 |
22 Symbolic Representations | 35 |
23 Subconceptual Representations | 40 |
24 Conceptual Representations | 43 |
25 Connections to Neuroscience | 48 |
26 Comparisons | 53 |
27 The Jungle of Representations | 56 |
Properties | 59 |
32 Properties in Intensional Semantics | 60 |
33 Criticism of the Traditional View of Properties | 62 |
34 Criteria for Natural Regions of Conceptual Spaces | 66 |
35 Natural Properties | 70 |
36 Reconsidering the Problems | 77 |
37 The Relativism of Conceptual Spaces | 80 |
38 Connections to Prototype Theory | 84 |
39 Voronoi Tessellations of a Space | 87 |
310 Higher Level Properties and Relations | 92 |
311 Conclusion | 99 |
Concepts | 101 |
42 Modeling Concepts | 102 |
43 The Role of Similarity in Concept Formation | 109 |
44 Combining Concepts | 114 |
45 Learning Concepts | 122 |
46 Nonmonotonic Aspects of Concepts | 126 |
54 An Analysis of Metaphors | 176 |
55 The Learnability Question | 187 |
56 Communicating Referents | 189 |
57 Can Meanings Be in the Head? | 196 |
The Semantic Program | 201 |
Induction | 203 |
62 The Symbolic Level | 205 |
63 The Conceptual Level | 211 |
64 The Role of Theoretical Concepts | 215 |
65 The Subconceptual Level | 219 |
66 Correlations between Domains | 225 |
What Is Induction? | 230 |
Computational Aspects | 233 |
72 Conceptual Spaces as Emergent Systems | 244 |
73 Smolenskys Treatment of Connectionism | 247 |
74 Not All Computation Is Done by Turing Machines | 249 |
75 A System for Object Recognition | 251 |
76 Conclusion | 253 |
In Chase of Space | 255 |
82 Connections among Levels | 257 |
The Need for a New Methodology | 259 |
Notes | 263 |
283 | |
Illustration Credits | 299 |
301 | |