Page images
PDF
EPUB

SECTION II. .

Trait of benevolence includes, again, good-will towards man in his religious capacity-Quakers said to have no spirit of persecution, nor to talk with bitterness with respect to other religious sects-this trait probable-because, nothing in their doctrine that narrows love-their sufferings on the other hand-and their law against detraction-and their aversion to making religion a subject of common talk-all in favour of this trait.

THE Word Benevolence, when mentioned as a trait in the character of the Quakers, includes also good-will to man in his religious capacity.

It has often been observed of the Quakers, that they show no spirit of persecution, and that you seldom hear them talk with bitterness with respect to other religious Societies. On the first part of this trait it may be observed, that the Quakers have never had any great power of exercising dominion over others in matters of religion. In America, where they have had the greatest, they have conducted themselves well. William Penn

secured

1

secured to every colonist the full rights of men as to religious opinion and worship. If the spirit of persecution is ever to be traced to the Quakers, it must be found in their writings on the subject of Religion. In one or two of the productions of their first authors, who were obliged to support their opinions by controversy, there is certainly an appearance of an improper warmth of temper; but it is remarkable that, since those times, scarcely a book has appeared, written by a Quaker, against the religion of another. Satisfied with their own religious belief, they seem to have wished only to be allowed to enjoy it in peace. For when they have appeared as polemical writers, it has been principally in defence of themselves.

On the second part of the trait I may remark, that it is possible, in the case of tithes, where their temper has been tried by expensive distraints and hard imprisonments, that they may utter a harsh expression against a system which they believe to be antichristian, and which they consider also as repugnant to equity, inasmuch as it compels them to pay labourers who perform no work in their own harvest. But this feeling is

only

only temporary, and is seldom extended beyond the object that produces it. They have never, to my knowledge, spoken with bitterness against Churchmen on this account. Nor have I ever heard them, in such a season of suffering, pass the slightest reflection upon their faith.

That this trait of benevolence to man in his religious capacity is probably true, I shall endeavour to show according to the method I have proposed.

There is nothing, in the first place, in the religious doctrines of the Quakers which can produce a narrowness of mind in religion, or a contempt for the creeds of others. I have certainly in the course of my life known some bigots in religion; though, like the Quakers, I censure no man for his faith. I have known some who have considered Baptism and the Sacrament of the Supper as such essentials in Christianity, as to deny that those who scrupled to admit them were Christians. I have known others pronouncing an anathema against persons, because they did not believe the Atonement in their own way. I have known others, again, who have descended into the greatest

depths

depths of Election and Reprobation, instead of feeling an awful thankfulness for their own condition as the elect, and the most tender and affectionate concern for those whom they considered to be the reprobate, indulging a kind of spiritual pride on their own account, which has ended in a contempt for others. Thus the doctrines of Christianity, wonderful to relate, have been made to narrow the love of Christians! The Quaker-religion, on the other hand, knows no such feelings as these. It considers the Spirit of God as visiting all men in their day, and as capable of redeeming all, and

this without any exception of persons; and

that the difference of creeds, invented by the human understanding, will make no difference in the eternal happiness of man. Thus, it does not narrow the sphere of salvation; it does not circumscribe it either by numerical or personal limits. There does not appear, therefore, to be in the doctrines of the Quaker-religion any thing that should narrow their love to their fellow-creatures, or any thing that should generate a spirit of rancour or contempt towards others, on account of the religion they profess.

There

There are, on the contrary, circumstances which have a tendency to produce an opposite effect.

I see, in the first place, no reason why the general spirit of benevolence to man in his temporal capacity, which runs through the whole Society, should not be admitted as having some power in checking a bitter spirit towards him in his religious character.

I see, again, that the sufferings which the Quakers so often undergo on account of their religious opinions, ought to have an influence with them in making them tender towards others on the same subject. Virgil, who was a great master of the human mind, makes the Queen of Carthage say to Æneas,

"Haud ignara mali, miseris succurrere disco;"

or, "Not unacquainted with misfortunes myself, I learn to succour the unfortunate." ---So one would hope, that the Quakers, of all other people, ought to know how wrong it is to be angry with another for his religion.

With respect to that part of the trait which relates to speaking acrimoniously of other sects, there are particular circumstances in the customs and discipline of the Quakers which seem likely to prevent it.

VOL. III.

N

It

« PreviousContinue »