bled the most intelligent merchants of Gaul, from whom he procured the means of accomplishing his purpose; and many particulars of the habits of the people, of which he made a profitable use in his subsequent invasion. With the mere military art we have nothing to do in the present case, further than to observe, that some of the states or provinces existing here at that period deputed ambassadors to deprecate the vehemence of the tyrant; thus establishing a custom but seldom departed from since that time. "Cæsar's Commentaries" being unquestionably the source most to be depended upon in tracing the earliest habits of our ancestors, I cannot do better than have recourse to them for those illustrations which they afford; adding further information from contemporary writers. This Roman found a community of priests in England which have obtained the term of Druids ; but why, or whence, they had that term, cannot now be ascertained: neither is it by any means possible to discover how, or at what earlier period, they received the implicit submission paid them by their countrymen. Reasoning from analogy, we may venture to suppose the origin of this particular order of priesthood was derived from the superior abilities of some one person, who had his peculiar opinions, and the ability and powers of oratory necessary to make proselytes. Numerous instances might be given, from comparatively modern modern history, of adventurers who have founded sects, and given them their names. Leaving farther conjectures on this subject to those who feel disposed to entertain them, it is certain that Cæsar discovered the Druids engaged in the double employment of the Priest and the Civilian; and themselves governed by an arch-priest, or president, whose place was supplied after death by the next in merit, or by a majority of votes. The official, thus appointed, had many privileges: he was exempt from personal service in war, paid no tribute, and had an immunity of all things. It is remarkable that in this particular their office strongly resembled that of the Levites, the most antient order of priests upon record. All authors, antient and modern, seem agreed, that the original form of government of every people in the known world has been monarchical. That it was the custom of the first inhabitants of this island either to elect, or have hereditary or usurping Kings, Cæsar convinces us by the facts and particulars he relates of them. Those Kings were, however, very different from Kings of later date; for as their subjects were little better than savages, so the government became alternately weak and coercive, as circumstances dictated. Besides, the Druids possessed a plenitude of power, which often infringed upon that of the King, who was, probably, a mere cypher; except in the capacity of a general in chief of all military operations. 1 operations. And even in this case the Priesthood interfered with auguries, and inflicted punishments upon such of the troops as did not perform their duty. Whence it appears that, in reality, the Druids were the supreme council of each state; making the few laws which connected society, and, perhaps, partially enforcing them by means of the monarch. Disputes respecting property, whether landed or personal, which terms we are not to accept precisely in their present signification, were decided by the Druids and this brotherhood pronounced sentence upon the commission of all crimes. From which we may infer, that the excellence of the trial by jury was felt and appreciated in England, even before its inhabitants possessed the art of conveying their knowledge to their posterity by writing or sculpture. Excommunication, the last resort for contumacy at present, was inflicted on the incorrigible; but not, perhaps, exactly in the modern form; as, it appears, the person offending was only denied the liberty of attending their sacrifices; than which a greater punishment could not be devised in the opinion of the Briton: the contempt of his neighbours was a natural consequence, which, in itself, operated to deprive him of other rights. In some farther assertions respecting the Druids, the Commentator seems to have been misinformed; or, more probably, his work has been interpolated; interpolated; particularly those parts respecting the Greek characters used by the Druids. That they had some characters to express their ideas, there is no good reason to doubt; and they may have resembled the Grecian; but it is impossible. to conceive why they declined committing their history or morals to writing; when, in their public and private accounts, they made use of the letters in question. According to Cæsar, the Druids established schools, and taught the youth they assembled to recite verses from memory; a task which occupied them twenty years. Unfortunately, it may be pretty safely asserted, that not a trace of inscription can be exhibited at present, which is of genuine Druidical origin. Indeed, the rude stones attributed to their erection seem to evince more the greatness of their conceptions, than their abilities in executing them. : It was, doubtless, customary to pay the King some tribute for the support of his family and regal state. Before the invention of a medium of metal, or any other substance as money, cattle and the produce of the earth were presented to him but in what proportion, as to the means of individuals, we are totally unacquainted. Judging from the unsettled state of society, his limited power, and disability to reward in return to any extent, makes it at least problematical whether his revenue exceeded his absolute necessities, We are well aware that even Kings, circumscribed as Qurs ours must have been by the Druids, might sometimes gain the affection of the armed multitude by leading them to a successful predatory war, when whatever spoils were obtained were distributed to the Prince and that multitude as they chose to agree, independent and in defiance of the authority exercised in other respects by the Druids. And in this point of view we may discern the cause of the decline of their power; for, as the ability of the prince to distribute wealth increased, the people were willing to barter even their freedom for it. By these, and perhaps other unknown causes, we find that Caractacus had accumulated a variety of splendid articles, which were displayed with him at Rome, to increase the honour of his capture. But long before that period, money had been coined by the British princes; and, no doubt, with much profit to themselves. Such were the general forms of this species of Government; which, as it afterwards prevailed in Brittany, some writers suppose was adopted there from England, rather than from thence to England. We may infer from Cæsar, that the husband had the power of sacrificing his wife to his just or unjust resentments. The wife of a chief was subject on the decease of her consort, upon suspicion of violence, to a cruel examination, instituted by his relations; who tortured her servants for evidence, and, on a supposed confirma |