Page images
PDF
EPUB

<

an entry of fome kind or other made, but it was expunged by order of parliament, January 7th, 1659. In Mercurius Politicus, which was published by authority at that time, there is an article, dated Westminster, April 20, in the following words: The lord general delivered in parliament divers reafons wherefore a prefent period fhould be put to the fitting of this parliament; and it was accordingly done; the fpeaker and the members all departing. The grounds of which proceedings will (its probable) be fhortly made pubWriters of Gazettes in all ages and countries. are pretty much the fame. -If the reader will turn (x) History to Mr. Hume, he may fee this ftory of the diffolution of Great of the parliament highly embellished (x). It may well Britain, vol. enough be thought a tranfaction of this nature muft ii. p. 44. have been variously cenfured. The common people, delighted with change, were far enough from being difpleafed; the Cavaliers and the other Royalifts with pleasure faw thofe men difplaced from that power they judged they had no right to affume; the Dutch were in hopes of obtaining peace on better terms than those fteady and refolute men ever would willingly have given them; whilft the true Republicans could not help crying out on Cromwell, who had interrupted the parliament in their career of glory. Mr. Whitlock's cenfure we have just seen. Another author thus exclaims against him. His falfenefs and ingratitude, fays he, appeared fuperlatively in turning out his mafters, who had not only advanced him, but made themselves more odious by their partial affection towards him, and in his doing it with the breach of a pofitive negative oath, taken once a year, when made a counfellor of ftate, befides the breach of all other engagements, voluntary imprecations, proteftations and oaths, taken frequently upon all occafions in dif'courfe and declarations; and yet further (when

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

(1) The

• he had turned them out, and left them void of pro- World's tection, and expofed them to the fury of the peop'e) miftake in in pursuing them with falfe reproachful declarations, Oliver ' enough to have flirred up the rude multitude to have deftroyed them, wherever they had met them (y).' Lond. 1668,

Y 2

Mr.

Cromwell,

p. 15. 410.

to justify it, as well as his apologists (xx). The grounds and reasons of this proceeding be

ing

Mr. Ludlow talks much in the fame ftrain. Cromwell's defence will be found in the following note.

[ocr errors]

(xx) Oliver attempted to justify it, as well as his apologifts.] On the twenty fecond of April, two days after the interruption or diffolution of the parliament, a declaration was published in the name of the lord-general and his council of officers, fhewing the grounds and reafons thereof. In this the neglect of the parliament, in fettling a due liberty in reference both to civil and fpiritual things, is lamented, and a defire of perpetuating themfelves in the fupream government afferted. For which purpofe,' fays the general and his officers, the corrupt party [the majority] long oppofed, and frequently declared themselves against having a new reprefentative and when they faw themselves neceffitated to take that bill into confideration, they refolved to make use of it to recruit the house with perfons of the fame fpirit and temper: and the better to effect this, divers petitions preparing from feveral ⚫ counties for the continuance of this parliament were encouraged, if not fet on foot by many of them.'. They go on to fay, That, having a meeting with about twenty members of parliament, they laid before them their judgment, that the fupream authority should be by the parliament devolved upon known persons, men fearing God, and of approved integrity, and the government of the commonwealth committed unto them for a time, as the most hopeful way to encourage and countenance all God's people, reform the law, and adminifter juftice impartially.' This, it feems, found no acceptance: but, instead thereof, it was offered, that the way was to continue ftill this prefent parliament, as being that from which we might reasonably expect all good things. And this being vehemently infifted upon, did much confirm us in our apprehenfions, that not any love to a repre6 fentative,

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

ing published, they were approved by the chief

[ocr errors]

fentative, but the making use thereof to recruit, and fo perpetuate themselves, was their aim. They being plainly dealt with about this, and told, that neither the nation, the honeft intereft, nor we ourselves, • would be deluded by fuch dealings, they did agree to • meet again the next day in the afternoon for mutual fatisfaction, it being confented to by the members prefent, that endeavours fhould be ufed, that nothing in the mean time fhould be done in parliament that might exclude or fruftrate the propofaís above mentioned. Notwithstanding this, the next morning the ⚫ parliament did make more hafte than ufual, in carrying on their faid act, being helped on therein by fome of the perfons engaged to us the night before; none of them which were then prefent endeavouring to oppofe the fame and being ready to put the main queftion for confummating the faid act, whereby our aforefaid propofals would have been rendered void, and the way of bringing them into a fair and full debate in parliament obftructed; for preventing whereof, and all the fad and evil confequences, which muft, upon the grounds aforefaid, have enfued, and whereby, at one blow, the intereft of all honeft men, and of this glorious caufe, had been in danger to be laid in the duft, and these nations embroiled in new troubles, at a time when our enemies abroad are watching all advantages against us, and fome of them actually engaged in a war with us: we have • been neceffitated, though with much reluctancy, to • put an end to this parliament; which yet we have done (we hope) out of an honeft heart, preferring this cause above our names, lives, families, or interefts, how dear foever; with clear intentions and real purposes of heart, to call to the government perfons of approved fidelity and honeft, believing, that as none wife will expect to gather grapes of thorns, fo good men will hope, that, if perfons fo qualified be • chofen,

[ocr errors]

Y 3

(2) Decla

ral, &c. London

Henry Hills

and Thomas Bewfter, printers to

the army. 410.1653.

chief officers in the fleet and army, and

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

the

chofen, the fruits of a juft and righteous reformation, fo long prayed and wished for, will, by the bleffing of God, be in due time obtained, to the reration of the freshing of all thofe good hearts who have been pantLord Gene-ing after thofe things (z).'ing after thofe things (z).'Mr. Maidfon, fteward of the household to Cromwell, a member of his parliaments, and well acquainted with his actions, speaking of his return to London from the victory at Worcester, adds, He had not long continued here, before it was ftrongly impreft upon him by thofe, to whom he had 6 no reason to be utterly incredulous, and ftrengthned by his own obfervation, that the perfons then called the parliament of the commonwealth of England, as from whom he had derived his authority, and by virtue whereof he had fought fo many holy men in Scotland into their graves, were not fuch as were spirited to carry the good intereft to an end, wherein he and < they had jeoparded all that was of concern to them in this world; and I wifh cordially, that there had not been too great a ground for thofe allegations. The • refult of them, after many debates betwixt the mem'bers then fitting, and the general, with fome who joined with him, was the diflolution of that parliament by a military force fince called by a fofter word, interruption (4)Thefe were the pleas in the defence of the diffolution by thofe who had accomplished it. Since this others have taken up the argument, and in behalf of Cromwell obferve, That the prefbyterian party being expelled the house, the small remainder was only a junto, which derived their authority from the power of the fword; their votes and acts were no farther laws than the fword constrained • obedience to them; they were only continued in their feats by Cromwell for a prefent convenience; and therefore as they were only countenanced and fupported by the power of the fword, which was then in the hands of Cromwell, they were to be looked upon as no 6 • other

(a) Thurloe, vol. i. p. 765.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

the general thereupon proceeded to nomi

[ocr errors]

nate

other than a party fet up by him, and owing their authority to him. So that when they began to extend that authority beyond its limits, and affumed to them⚫ felves a democratical power in oppofition to him from whom they derived their fubfiftence, they were rather rebels to Cromwell, than Cromwell to them; and as 'he fet them up in hopes that they might be ferviceable to him for the good of the nation, might pull them down again, when he faw them exceeding their commiffion. Now whether the defign for the bringing of which to país, Cromwell fixed them in their feats pro tempore, were good or bad, is not the question: but 'whether they who were no lawful authority, but only acted under the fafeguard of another unlawful authority, had power to make any act good or evil, as it fuited with their intereft, or oppofed their defigns. For if they had not, which is most probable, Cromwell is never a jot the more impious, the more perjured, the more villain, because they call him fo. For being a junto of his own erecting, upon fuch and 'fuch confiderations, he might without any fear of those reproaches, fend them a grazing when he found them deviating from thofe ends for which he had fuffered (¿) Modest them to keep their places (b).'——Mr. Repin is an Vindication advocate on the fame fide of the queftion. The re- Cromwell, publicans, fays he, were enraged against Cromwell, p. 49. and deemed him the most perfidious of men. This is not very strange, fince he had wrefted from that parliament the fovereign power, feized by thefe republicans without any lawful authority. But what was this parliament? It was an affembly of independents, anabaptifts, fanaticks, enthufiafts, and others of no religion, who under colour of establishing a free commonwealth, held the nation in fervitude; who, to 'confirm their own authority, had treated their fellow 'members with unheard of violence, and dared to embrue their hands in the blood of the late King,

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[blocks in formation]

of Oliver

« PreviousContinue »